<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Work Ahead in New York Before Drilling Begins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marcellusdrilling.com/2009/10/more-work-ahead-in-new-york-before-drilling-begins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marcellusdrilling.com/2009/10/more-work-ahead-in-new-york-before-drilling-begins/</link>
	<description>Landowner News &#38; Resources - Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:52:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://marcellusdrilling.com/2009/10/more-work-ahead-in-new-york-before-drilling-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcellusdrilling.com/?p=275#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment--all views happily accepted on MDN. I choose my language very carefully. I use the word shill because it is transparently obvious that Mr. Wilbur is not representing both sides nor even attempting to cover the pro-drilling point of view. I use eco-nuts because the organizations that oppose drilling are adamant and complete in their desire--no drilling whatsoever under any circumstances ever. Their viewpoint is childish and a fantasy and I am pointing that out. It is &quot;nuts&quot;.

On the other hand, perhaps you have a point in that good and honest people may have concerns and oppose drilling--my quarrel is not with them. I am happy to discuss and debate the pros and cons with reasonable people. The people I lambaste with my language are, in my opinion, not reasonable and never will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment&#8211;all views happily accepted on MDN. I choose my language very carefully. I use the word shill because it is transparently obvious that Mr. Wilbur is not representing both sides nor even attempting to cover the pro-drilling point of view. I use eco-nuts because the organizations that oppose drilling are adamant and complete in their desire&#8211;no drilling whatsoever under any circumstances ever. Their viewpoint is childish and a fantasy and I am pointing that out. It is &#8220;nuts&#8221;.</p>
<p>On the other hand, perhaps you have a point in that good and honest people may have concerns and oppose drilling&#8211;my quarrel is not with them. I am happy to discuss and debate the pros and cons with reasonable people. The people I lambaste with my language are, in my opinion, not reasonable and never will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metroart</title>
		<link>http://marcellusdrilling.com/2009/10/more-work-ahead-in-new-york-before-drilling-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>metroart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marcellusdrilling.com/?p=275#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I think your characterization of gas drilling opponents as &quot;shills&quot; and &quot;eco-nuts&quot; is a disgrace. How do you expect to be taken seriously if you use such</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your characterization of gas drilling opponents as &#8220;shills&#8221; and &#8220;eco-nuts&#8221; is a disgrace. How do you expect to be taken seriously if you use such</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
