What if NatGas (Not Solar & Wind) is the Real Future of Energy?

We've been saying the following until we're blue (flame) in the face (pun intended): Natural gas is not a *bridge* to the future of energy, natural gas is THE DESTINATION. We have enough gas supplies for at least 100 years, likely much longer. Natgas is low emissions. It's not harming Mom Earth. What's not to love about extracting and BURNING natural gas? It seems others are now embracing this view. An editorial in the Wall Street Journal asks the question, if Warren Buffett is willing to invest $10 billion to help Occidental Petroleum buy Anadarko Petroleum, what does old Warren know that we don't? Here's the better question: What if renewables don't pan out after all? What if renewables can't supply all of our energy needs? Is that what old Warren is thinking?

---

To view this content, log into your member account. (Not a member? Join Today!)