OH Court Rules Landmen Need to be Licensed Real Estate Brokers

We know this is an important story, and we know that some (many?) MDN readers will be interested. But this is one of those rare cases where we just can't get our heads around the scope and importance of the story--and who it really affects. We had thought that landmen in Ohio (agents who deal with landowners and mineral rights owners, getting them to sign leases or easements) did not have to be licensed real estate agents in order to do their job. However, a court case just decided in Ohio’s Seventh District Court of Appeals seems to say that at least some landmen DO need to be licensed real estate agents, in order to get paid a commission on deals they've brokered. We don't think the decision requiring a real estate license applies to all landmen in Ohio (although we're open to correction on that point). Below we have information about the Dundics v. Eric Petroleum Corp. case, along with previous info from 2014 that indicates the reverse--that Ohio landmen DO NOT need to be licensed real estate brokers. Does the Dundics case supersede previous rulings? Is the Dundics case dealing with an obscure situation that doesn't apply to all landmen? We simply don't know...

---

To view this content, log into your member account. (Not a member? Join Today!)