Ohio DMA Decision Explained at December Seminar in Columbus

| | | |
Gavel-falling.jpgMDN has highlighted the importance of the Ohio Supreme Court's decision with regard to the Ohio Dormant Mineral Act (DMA). In September the OH Supreme Court ruled in three DMA cases, saying all of the other cases come under those three (see Important: OH Supreme Court Finally Rules on Dormant Mineral Act). Following that ruling, we brought you insights on what it means from international law firm Jones Day (see One More Look at Important OH Supreme Court DMA Decision). We later ran a copy of an analysis done by attorney David Wigham, who said, "[T]he landscape regarding title and ownership to mineral interests in Ohio has significantly changed" (see Expert Says OH DMA Decision “Significantly Changed” Mineral Rights). An MDN subscriber from a major Ohio driller reached out to editor Jim Willis to ask for help in promoting an event being hosted by the Energy & Mineral Law Foundation for lawyers on the topic of the recent DMA decision. We are happy to do so given the importance of the decision and its profound effect on both drillers and landowners in the Buckeye State. Here's the lowdown on the Ohio Dormant Mineral Act Special Institute, Dec. 12 in Columbus, OH...

To view this content, log into your member account. (Not a member? Join Today!)