PA’s Uneven Tax Treatment of Marcellus Industry vs. Amazon HQ2
What if a private company wanted to locate in a state, bringing with it 243,000 direct and spin-off jobs with an average salary of $93,000? And what if that company invested billions of dollars in the state economy? No doubt the state (and local municipalities) would offer up plenty of incentives to ensure they get the business. Pittsburgh and Philadelphia (and the State of Pennsylvania) are doing just that--offering up all sorts of incentives to attract Amazon to build its HQ2 project in the Keystone State--a project that promises a huge investment and thousands of employees. However, Amazon's HQ2 will not employ 243,000 people and inject billions--not anywhere close. But there is an industry that is ALREADY doing exactly what we've outlined in the opening sentence. The Marcellus Shale industry has created 243,000 direct and indirect jobs (with an average salary of $93K per year) and has already pumped billions of dollars into the economy. And yet the State of PA and places like Pittsburgh and Philly are, in many ways, fighting against the industry! They don't offer tax breaks, instead they offer new tax increases! What's going on here? Why does PA treat Jeff Bezos and Amazon one way, and the Marcellus industry another? Why does PA pick "winners" and "losers" economically? That's the important topic of a column we recently spotted by Lowman Henry, chairman and CEO of the Lincoln Institute...
To view this content, log into your member account. (Not a member? Join Today!)