AP Takes Swipe at NED Pipeline over Export Issue, MDN Responds

| | | | | | |
Once again the AP attempts to make a case against Kinder Morgan's Northeast Energy Direct (NED) pipeline project that would stretch from Pennsylvania through New York (following the Constitution Pipeline's route) and into Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and back into Massachusetts near Boston. NED is a huge $6 billion project that will provide jobs for thousands (while it's constructed) and abundant, cheap Marcellus Shale gas for New Englanders, saving them on the order of $1 billion per year on utility bills for decades to come. But irrational hatred of fossil fuels continues to rein in liberal New England, where many oppose the project (see Deerfield, MA Hoping Kinder Morgan Sues Them over Pipeline “Ban”). The AP has taken up the "most of the gas flowing through the pipeline will get exported" argument, in an effort to stop the pipeline (so much for unbiased "reporting"). Exported where and how? Via one of five planned LNG export facilities in Canada, four of them in Nova Scotia. Just one little problem there AP, it looks very doubtful that any of those plants will actually get built (see Moody’s: “Vast Majority” of LNG Export Projects Will be Canceled). That kind of takes the wind out of the "it'll all get exported" argument, eh? But let's assume at least one of those LNG export plants does get built...

To view this content, log into your member account. (Not a member? Join Today!)