Making the Case for ESG and So-Called Net Zero Emissions in Shale
We’ve made no bones about the fact we’re dubious of most so-called ESG (environmental, social, governance) initiatives by any company, including shale oil and gas drillers. But there are many in our industry who have (seemingly overnight) embraced ESG with open arms. One of them is the chairman of the board for DJ Basin producer Civitas/managing partner at the Kimmeridge Energy Management, Ben Dell. Dell presents a vision of the shale energy future like this: There are 10-15 shale drillers nationwide, and every one of them is operating with net zero carbon emissions. What may sound like nirvana to Dell sounds like dystopia to us.
Read More “Making the Case for ESG and So-Called Net Zero Emissions in Shale”
Last week MDN told you that EQT Corporation, the largest natural gas driller in the U.S., had released its 2020 ESG report and announced the company would be “net carbon zero” by 2025 or sooner (see 
In April, CNX Resources Corp. announced instead of just blowing smoke about ESG (environmental, social, governance) with pretty slide shows and hoopla, they would donate $30 million to local, underserved communities and populations in the tri-state region (see 
With all of this blather about ESG (environmental, social, governance) and net zero and so-called “renewable” natural gas (RNG), has anyone stepped back to ask the question, Will utility companies (and their ratepayers) actually pay more for green gas? Reuters has asked the question and it seems that right now, the answer is a resounding NO!
Yesterday EQT, the largest natural gas producer in the U.S., released its annual Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Report, outlining the company’s 2020 operational data and initiatives aimed at improving the way EQT produces “environmentally responsible,” reliable, and low-cost energy. Additionally, EQT announced targets to achieve net zero Scope 1 and 2 so-called greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in its production operations by or before 2025–less than four years away.
One of the driving forces behind the whole ESG (environmental, social, governance) push that aims to force oil and gas companies to foreswear using the very product they extract from the ground is what we called pimple-faced Millennial investors. Kids who grew up watching Captain Planet cartoons–and believing what they watched. A form of mind-control and brainwashing. A sharp investment expert has analyzed investing for ESG and proves it’s a sham. It’s a fraud. It’s the “Great Wall Street Money Heist”…
As we have pointed out more than a few times, one of the biggest problems we have with so-called ESG (environment, social, governance) programs lauded by the oil and gas industry, including those in the Marcellus/Utica, is the lack of an objective standard. Anyone can define ESG any way they want. In fact, last week we published an article in which the president at LNG Europe Institute for Methane Fuels (based in Austria) said, “ESG is an utter waste of space and money to provide a bunch of expensive consultants with ‘good for nothing’ jobs and also to provide cover for managers of mainly public companies” (see 
Cheniere Energy Inc., the biggest LNG exporter in the U.S., is using its bigness to lean on natural gas drillers (in the upstream) and pipeline companies (in the midstream) to “clean up the natural gas supply chain.” How? To force drillers and pipelines to get their operations to so-called net zero carbon emissions sooner rather than later. Given the fact Cheniere buys up 7-8% of ALL natural gas supplies in the country on any given day, they can and are throwing their weight around to force others to do what they want. The LNG tail is wagging the natural gas dog.
If you’ve been reading MDN over the past few months, no doubt you’ve detected our skepticism over the sudden rise of ESG (environmental, social, governance) programs that are now all the rage with oil and gas companies, including Marcellus/Utica companies. As we previously stated, “We’re approaching the point where we’ll puke if we hear much more about ESG. The problem, from our perspective, is that the term itself is nebulous. Anyone can define ESG any way they want. What does ESG really mean?” So when we spotted an article titled “How to tell a real oil and gas ESG program from a fake,” we just had to read it.
S&P Global Market Intelligence has been publishing a multipart series exploring the natural gas industry’s role and prospects in the so-called energy transition happening across the world. A mania has taken hold forcing all companies to cut so-called greenhouse gas emissions–including companies in the energy industry. (Don’t forget what they produce are hydrocarbons, so they have to cut their own use of very thing they produce.) What is the role of natural gas in a “low carbon” world? How can upstream (drilling) companies adapt and stay in business? S&P says natural gas’ “low carbon challenge” is to stay cheap and get “cleaner.” What do they mean?
Range Resources has joined the bandwagon of Marcellus/Utica drillers paying homage to ESG (environmental, social, governance) concerns by pimple-faced Millennial investors who demand all companies, even oil and gas companies, bow down to the global warming gods. Range announced its board of directors has formed an ESG and Safety Committee, and that the company has enrolled in the same program several other M-U drillers have joined called Project Canary.
So-called ESG (environmental, social, governance) programs are popping up everywhere–kind of like spring dandelions. Especially programs aimed at the E (environmental) part of that acronym. EQT Corporation, the country’s largest natural gas producer (focused 100% on the Marcellus/Utica) has recently gotten the ESG religion. EQT has joined (by our count) no less than four ESG programs this year. The latest is a program sponsored by LNG export king Cheniere Energy, aimed at monitoring and cutting down on methane emissions at drill sites. Two other M-U drillers are joining the Cheniere effort too.
Terms are often thrown around that remain somewhat amorphous and undefined in our minds. Especially in a complex industry like oil and gas. What do certain terms really mean? Today we define what a “clean frac”–otherwise known as a “green completion”–actually means, and why it’s so appealing to pimple-faced, woke millennials who place a premium on ESG (environmental, social, and governance) investing.
Just yesterday MDN told you that Chesapeake Energy had enrolled in the same program EQT Corporation previously enrolled in to certify its natural gas as “responsibly sourced” (see