Range Resources Corp

  • | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Top 10 Drillers in SWPA, by Number of Permits Issued

    Every now and again it’s fun to take a look at a “Top 10” list. Here’s one for you. How about a Top 10 List for drillers in southwestern PA, in Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Clarion, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lawrence, Washington, and Westmoreland counties. This Top 10 list ranks drillers by how many shale well permits they’ve been granted. The list is extracted from a Top 40 list prepared by the (must read) Pittsburgh Business Times. Can you guess which 10 drillers are in the Top 10? How about the Top 1? It may come as no surprise that Range Resources, the very first company to drill a Marcellus Shale well (in 2004), has received the most permits to drill in SWPA. Here’s the full Top 10 list, with some interesting extra details…
    Read More “Top 10 Drillers in SWPA, by Number of Permits Issued”

  • | | | | | |

    Range/DEP Lycoming Well Settlement: From $8.9M Fine to $0

    Yesterday MDN brought you the news that Range Resources and the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) have officially “settled” something we thought was already settled–alleged methane migration from a well Range drilled in 2011 (see Range & PA DEP Settle re Alleged Methane Leak at Lycoming Well). In June 2015, then-Secretary of the DEP, John Quigley, slapped Range with an $8.9 million fine–the largest such fine ever levied by the DEP (see PA DEP Slaps Range with Record $8.9M Fine for Methane Migration). The DEP said a Range well, drilled in 2011 in Lycoming County, PA, leaked methane since at least 2013 via an improperly cemented well casing, and the methane “contaminated the groundwater-fed wells of private water supplies, and a nearby stream.” Range and the landowner where the well is drilled said methane was in groundwater supplies long before Range drilled the well. Range fought the action tooth and nail, appealing the determination and fine to the PA Environmental Hearing Board. In May 2016, the DEP quietly dropped the fine and the case against Range (see PA DEP Drops $8.9M Fine Against Range Res. re Methane Migration). We thought that was THE END. But it wasn’t. On Monday of this week, both Range and the DEP filed paperwork with the Environmental Hearing Board (a special court set up to hear appeals of DEP decisions) requesting the matter now officially be closed and “settled.” We now have a copy of the settlement itself–and it shows the DEP will not extra one penny from Range over what they previously said should cost $8.9 million. Interesting. Antis like THE Delaware Riverkeeper, Maya van Rossum, are “dumbfounded” at the settlement. Below is a copy of the settlement paperwork and select anti reaction to it…
    Read More “Range/DEP Lycoming Well Settlement: From $8.9M Fine to $0”

  • | | | | | |

    Range & PA DEP Settle re Alleged Methane Leak at Lycoming Well

    Range Resources and the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) have officially “settled” something we thought was already settled–alleged methane migration from a well Range drilled in 2011. In June 2015, then-Secretary of the DEP, John Quigley, slapped Range with an $8.9 million fine–the largest such fine ever levied by the DEP (see PA DEP Slaps Range with Record $8.9M Fine for Methane Migration). Range’s enviro crime? Methane migration from a well in Lycoming County, PA. The DEP says the Range well, drilled in 2011, leaked methane since at least 2013 via an improperly cemented well casing, and the methane “contaminated the groundwater-fed wells of private water supplies, and a nearby stream.” Range and the landowner where the well is drilled say methane was in groundwater supplies long before Range drilled the well. Range fought the action tooth and nail, appealing the determination and fine to the PA Environmental Hearing Board (see PA DEP’s $8.9M Methane Migration Fine Appealed by Range Resources). In May 2016, the DEP quietly dropped the fine and the case against Range (see PA DEP Drops $8.9M Fine Against Range Res. re Methane Migration). We assumed that was the end of the matter. But alas, no. We now, finally, have an end. Both Range and the DEP filed paperwork with the Environmental Hearing Board (a special court set up to hear appeals of DEP decisions) requesting the matter now officially be closed and “settled.” The paperwork (copy below) does not say what the terms of the settlement are. Both Range and the DEP are being mum about the terms…
    Read More “Range & PA DEP Settle re Alleged Methane Leak at Lycoming Well”

  • | | | |

    Findlay Twp Signs Deal w/Range to Drill Under Town Park, $3K/Acre

    Findlay Township (Allegheny County, PA, west of Pittsburgh) has just signed a deal with Range Resources to allow drilling under (not on) the towns 61-acre Clinton Park. Terms of the deal: Findlay gets a $3,000 per acre signing bonus and when the gas begins to flow, an 18% royalty. That means Findlay will get a nice, fat check for $183,000 in the next 90 days. The lease has been a long time in coming. Town supervisors worked on a deal five years ago, but then drilling slowed down and the deal was “put on the shelf.” Range will actually drill under the property from the Seibel Farm, which sits just over the border in Beaver County. The board of supervisors voted unanimously to approve the deal…
    Read More “Findlay Twp Signs Deal w/Range to Drill Under Town Park, $3K/Acre”

  • |

    Range Resources 2Q17 – Hints at Selling NE PA Marcellus

    Range Resources, the very first driller to sink a Marcellus (back in 2004), released its second quarter 2017 results and held a conference call yesterday to discuss it. Range had a great 2Q17, with record production of close to 2 billion cubic feet per day (up 37% from 2Q16). Range’s Marcellus/Utica gas production was up 9% year over year. Range continues to drill impressive wells. One pad with seven wells drilled in the wet gas Marcellus area saw initial production (IP) rates averaging 29.1 million cubic feet equivalent per day (MMcfe/d), while a set of four wells on another pad in the Marcellus dry gas area say IP rates of 30.0 MMcfe/d. By the end of 2017, Range plans to have drilled and turned in line (TIL) 113 new wells in the Marcellus/Utica, and 56 new wells in the Louisiana Haynesville Shale. Yes, Range continues to ramp up its Haynesville program after buying Memorial Resource for $3.3 billion last year, spending money in Louisiana rather in Pennsylvania–which is a warning to the severance taxers in PA that companies can and will leave the state. On yesterday’s conference call Range CEO Jeff Ventura was asked a question about his views on Marcellus/Utica companies merging, like EQT/Rice. He responded: “If you think about it at a very high level, fewer companies I think in the Basin drilling is probably a positive thing. It’s probably a more pace development, a more prudent and more rational development. So I think that’s a good thing for the macro.” Range CFO Roger Manny hinted that Range may be looking to unload their considerable acreage position in northeastern PA when he responded this way to a question about more asset sales: “So we still have assets in the Mid-Continent that would be deemed non-core. One can make the case that the stuff we have in Northeast Pennsylvania, although it’s high quality, is away from that core blocky stacked pay position we have in the Southwest. So there’s other assets we have that we could sell.” Sounds like Range intends to concentrate on SWPA and LA moving forward…
    Read More “Range Resources 2Q17 – Hints at Selling NE PA Marcellus”

  • | | | |

    Update on “Evolving Giant” Utica Shale – from Range Resources

    In early April of this year the 2017 AAPG (American Association of Petroleum Geologists) Annual Convention & Exhibition was held in Houston, TX. During one of the sessions, William Zagorski and Taylor McClain delivered a talk called “Discovery of the Utica Shale: Update on an Evolving Giant.” The interesting thing is that Zagorski and McClain work for Range Resources–the first driller in the Marcellus, not the Utica. We don’t have a transcript of that talk, but we do have an abstract and the slide deck used during the talk (below). The slide deck is fascinating. It begins with a history of the Utica. Did you know that the earliest Utica discoveries were in Ontario, Canada? And that the earliest drilling done in the play here in the U.S. was done in Upstate New York–near the Watertown area? No, we didn’t realize that either. In fact, a large swath of the Utica Shale layer underlies New York State–what a pity we can’t explore it because of a corrupt dictator by the name of Andrew Cuomo. At any rate, below is the slide deck, with slides outlining where the “wet gas” and “dry gas” zones are in the Utica. And exploring how Ohio became synonymous with the term Utica Shale…
    Read More “Update on “Evolving Giant” Utica Shale – from Range Resources”

  • | | |

    Utica Super Lateral Wells Now Catching on in Other Plays

    Click for larger version

    What is a “super lateral” as opposed to a “long lateral” when it comes to shale drilling? And who is drilling these really long wells? That’s the topic of a recent post by energy expert Richard Zeits on the Seeking Alpha investors website. We’ll give you our definition. But first, some brief background. When you read about a “lateral” in shale wells, it refers to the part of the well that is horizontal. When drilling a new well, you first (of course) drill vertically–more or less straight up and down. But at a certain depth, when you hit the shale layer you are targeting, you gradually turn the hole so that it becomes horizontal, running through the rock layer (see the illustration). The horizontal part is the lateral. In the early days of Marcellus (and Utica) shale wells, laterals were perhaps a maximum of 2,000 feet in length. Today? The longest on-shore lateral in the world (all three of them, actually) are located in Ohio–drilled by Eclipse Resources. Eclipse’s wells–first the Purple Hayes, then the Great Scott and most recently the Outlaw–are considered “super laterals” because they exceed 15,000 feet. In the case of the Outlaw C 11H well in Guernsey County, OH, the lateral is a staggering 19,500 feet long (see Eclipse Breaks Record Again – New Longest Shale Well in World!). If we use the metric that a “super lateral” is 15,000 feet or longer, there is one Marcellus well that qualifies (see Range Resources Drills Longest Marcellus Well Ever – in Washington Co.). While Mr. Zeits doesn’t use the exact metric of 15,000 feet, he does talk about super laterals, and predicts they will soon become common. He notes some new news for us: Chesapeake Energy has drilled an Eagle Ford oil well with a 17,000 foot lateral. Zeits says we should expect to see this in other plays too. We found his musings over super laterals, and the economics behind them, interesting…
    Read More “Utica Super Lateral Wells Now Catching on in Other Plays”

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Top 10 Natural Gas Producers in the U.S., Post-EQT/Rice Merger

    As we were reading about yesterday’s big news of EQT buying Rice Energy, we came across a couple of lists (same list, different sources) listing the top 10 natural gas-producing companies in the United States. The list was reworked to show that the combination of EQT and Rice will create the #1 largest natural gas-producing company in the country. An astonishing feat. But what caught our eye in looking over the “top 10” list was just how many of the companies in that list have operations in the Marcellus/Utica. At one time or another, all 10 of the top 10 owned leases and/or drilled in the Marcellus/Utica. By our count, 8 of the top 10 still do. You already know that EQT/Rice will become the #1 producer. But who is #2, and #3? And what about the rest of the list? We have it for you below…
    Read More “Top 10 Natural Gas Producers in the U.S., Post-EQT/Rice Merger”

  • | | |

    Range Resources Drills Longest Marcellus Well Ever – in Washington Co.

    Somerset Township, Washington, PA

    While it’s not as long as the longest Utica well in the world drilled by Eclipse Resources (19,500 feet long, see today’s lead story), Range Resources is tooting its own horn about drilling the longest Marcellus well–a huge 15,000 feet long horizontally. Range is the company that drilled the very first horizontal Marcellus Shale well, back in 2004. In those early days, the average length of the horizontal portion of the well (called the lateral) was around 2,500 feet long (half a mile). Today, the average lateral length is closing in on 3 miles! Recently Range was drilling a series of Marcellus wells in Somerset Township (Washington County), PA. When the lateral length hit 15,000, Range knew it was a new company record. As they began checking, they found it was also a Marcellus record–in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio. The Range wells in Somerset are the (so far) longest Marcellus Shale wells ever drilled…
    Read More “Range Resources Drills Longest Marcellus Well Ever – in Washington Co.”

  • | | | | |

    Platts: M-U Drillers Need to Double Rigs to Fill Pipelines in ’17

    Platts senior energy analyst Luke Jackson yesterday posted a Platts Snapshot titled, “New Northeast US Gas Pipelines Will be Hard to Fill.” Provocative title. It’s a video. Below is a transcript of the video. In it, Jackson says according to their analysis that drillers in southwestern PA and eastern OH and the northern panhandle of WV will struggle, but eventually succeed, in producing enough natural gas to fill new pipelines coming online this year. But they won’t be able to fulfill their obligations until perhaps December 2017. That is, Antero, Range Resources and Ascent Resources will need to rapidly ramp up drilling–or risk paying for pipeline capacity they’re not using. However, it was Jackson’s comment about pipelines coming online in 2018 and 2019 that really caught our attention. He says in the video: “This new capacity will be nearly impossible to fill, barring a massive ramp in drilling activity, which, per our forecast, is not expected to occur.” So Platts says Marcellus/Utica drillers will not be able to produce enough natural gas to fill all of the new pipelines that will be online by 2019. If we assume the price of natgas goes higher over the next few years (not an unreasonable assumption), what this means is that new drilling is going to ramp up like crazy in the next few years. Buckle up! Here’s the transcript…
    Read More “Platts: M-U Drillers Need to Double Rigs to Fill Pipelines in ’17”

  • | | | | | |

    PA Supreme Court Rejects Range Resources Well Contamination Case

    For years we’ve followed the story of Range Resources and their (former) wastewater impoundments in Washington County, PA. The PA Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) fined Range a whopping $4.15 million for violations in September 2014 (see PA DEP Fines Range Resources $4.15M for Wastewater Impoundments). Some of the nearby neighbors claimed that Range’s leaky impoundments (a quarter of a mile away) contaminated their water wells. One of those landowners was Loren Kiskadden, who sued Range in civil court. The problem is, the DEP determined that the nearby Yeager impoundment had not contaminated Kiskadden’s well, which led to allegations that the DEP had bungled the investigation (see Did DEP Mishandle Range Wastewater Impoundment Investigation?). Kiskadden had to press on, because if the DEP doesn’t reverse its finding, he has no civil case against Range. Press on he did (see Hearing on Range Yeager Impoundment/Water Contamination Continues). The matter was heard by the DEP’s Environmental Hearing Board (EHB). The EHB found that Kiskadden didn’t have a case–his well was not contaminated by Range’s impoundment. So Kiskadden and his lawyers asked for a re-hearing. The result of that re-hearing came in December 2015 and, we thought, finally closed the door, once and for all (see DEP Final Determination: Range Didn’t Pollute Kiskadden Water Well). But no, that was not the end. Kiskadden appealed again, and in October 2016 a Commonwealth Court appeals panel affirmed the EHB’s 2015 dismissal of Kiskadden’s appeal of the DEP 2011 ruling that Range’s Yeager site operations did not contaminate Kiskadden’s well water. Case closed, right? Nope. Kiskadden had one card left to play and he did it–filing an appeal with the PA Supreme Court (see Landowner Appeals Range Well Contamination Case to PA Supreme Crt). Earlier this week, the Supreme Court sent back the appeal marked “case denied.” The fat lady has now sung…
    Read More “PA Supreme Court Rejects Range Resources Well Contamination Case”

  • |

    Range Resources 1Q17: Production Soars 40%, 1st Profit in 2 Yrs

    Range Resources, one of the most prolific producers in southwestern Pennsylvania, reported its first quarter of profit in two years. Range swung from a loss of $94 million in 1Q16 to a profit of $170 million in 1Q17. After two years of cutting its capital expenditure spending, Range is once again increasing capex. This year, Range plans to spend $1.15 billion, with 65% allocated to the Marcellus Shale in PA, and the rest to the Terryville Field in LA. Production soared for the company by 40% year over year, to a new record high of 1.93 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) per day. Below we have the full Range 1Q17 update, along with the latest PowerPoint slide deck. We’ve also extracted out some interesting comments from the quarterly earnings call, which highlight Range’s program of drilling longer laterals in the Marcellus…
    Read More “Range Resources 1Q17: Production Soars 40%, 1st Profit in 2 Yrs”

  • |

    Range Resources’ PR Chief Matt Pitzarella Jumps Ship to Law Firm

    Matt Pitzarella

    Here’s a bit of personnel news that caught us by surprise. Back in January Matt Pitzarella, director of corporate communications and public affairs for Range Resources, announced he was leaving Range. Matt has been a fixture in the Marcellus universe since we started writing the MDN website in 2009. Range, as you may or may not know, was the first driller to sink a Marcellus horizontal/fracked well–back in 2004. The company remains one of the largest and most active drillers in the PA Marcellus. Over the years Matt, working from the company’s Southpointe office, has been the face of the company. MDN editor Jim Willis bumped into Matt a few times over the years at various industry conferences–although Jim doubts Matt remembers. Still, it’s kind of sad to lose one of the most visible faces of the industry. So what’s next for Matt? That’s the new news. Matt has just been hired by Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Pittsburgh’s third largest law firm, to be the firm’s director of the Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Section. No, Matt is not a lawyer. This is new territory for both Matt and Buchanan…
    Read More “Range Resources’ PR Chief Matt Pitzarella Jumps Ship to Law Firm”

  • |

    Range Resources – Lost $521M in 2016; 1/3 of 2017 Budget for LA

    Range Resources released its 2016 update on Wednesday and held an earnings call yesterday to discuss it. In what should be a big red warning flag for Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, Range CEO Jeff Ventura said, “2016 was a significant year for Range, as we completed the acquisition of Memorial Resource Development in September, providing Range operational and geographic diversity with wells that rival our prolific Marcellus wells.” The Memorial purchase provides Range with 220,000 acres on which to drill–in Louisiana (see Range Resources Buys Louisiana Driller in Deal Worth $4.4B). No, Range isn’t leaving the Marcellus–yet. But if Wolf persists with an idiotic plan to enact the highest severance tax in the country, Range now has options–and they won’t hesitate to use those options. In 2016, Range reported natural gas production of 375.81 billion cubic feet (Bcf), which works out to 1.03 Bcf/d. That’s up 3.6% versus 362.69 Bcf, or 994 MMcf/d, in 2015. For 2017, Range will split its drilling budget. The company is spending $1.15 billion on drilling this year: two-thirds will be spent in the Marcellus and one-third (disappointingly) will be spent in Louisiana. Pay attention Gov. Wolf–already we’re seeing a shift! As for top line numbers, Range lost $521 million in 2016, vs. losing $714 million in 2015. Losses in 4Q16 were down a lot from the previous year: Range lost $161 million in 4Q16 vs. losing $322 million in 4Q15. Below is the Range update, along with a portion of the earnings call (interesting comments by Range’s COO Ray Walker), the latest PowerPoint slide deck and Range’s SEC 10-K report…
    Read More “Range Resources – Lost $521M in 2016; 1/3 of 2017 Budget for LA”

  • | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Top 20 Marcellus Drillers in Southwest Pennsylvania

    The sharp folks over at the Pittsburgh Business Times have been looking through data from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and have compiled a list of 20 drillers who have at least a dozen shale wells in the southwest PA region. And they ranked them from lowest to highest. We’ve grabbed the list below. The interesting thing for MDN is that there is one name in the list not familiar to us, and we’ve been watching this space since 2009. Always fun to learn something new. Here’s the list of southwest PA’s “Top 20” Marcellus drillers…
    Read More “Top 20 Marcellus Drillers in Southwest Pennsylvania”

  • | | | | | | |

    PA Case Highlights Risk in Using Non-Lawyer to Negotiate Lease

    In August 2013 an extensive investigative article about a then-director for the Pennsylvania Game Commission, William A. Capouillez, appeared in the Philadelphia Inquirer (see PA Director of Game Commission Double-Dipping with Gas Leases?). The article spotlighted a potential conflict of interest between Capouillez’s day job and his moonlighting side job as an agent for property owners who lease their land for oil and gas development. The issue? He was signing private deals with the same companies that often work with his state agency. The State Ethics Commission did a lengthy investigation and three years later, the Commission levied a $75,000 fine, which Capouillez agreed to pay (see Former PA Game Commissioner Fined $75K for Lease Moonlighting). Although he paid the fine, Capouillez remained defiant and said the fine is a tiny fraction of the original fine sought–an indication of his vindication. There is new litigation involving Capouillez. One of the leases he negotiated was on behalf of the Laurel Hill Game and Forestry Club with Range Resources. The way Capouillez constructed his leases was that he would get a cut, a percentage, of any lease signing bonus and ongoing royalty payments, in return for the leases he brokered. Range never drilled on Laurel Hill’s property, but they did start to push dirt around a few hours before the lease expired as a way of holding the acreage (some would call their action a less-than-honorable practice). Laurel Hill sued Range and the lawsuit was later settled by drafting up a new lease with new terms. The new lease/terms were not brokered by Capouillez and he was cut out of the deal–so Capouillez sued both Laurel Hill and Range. The moral of the story, according to lawyers writing about the case, is to never use non-lawyers to represent you in lease negotiations…
    Read More “PA Case Highlights Risk in Using Non-Lawyer to Negotiate Lease”