Proposed NatGas Gross Receipts Tax Targets PA Low-Income Earners
MDN has previously reported on efforts in Pennsylvania to substitute a so-called “gross receipts tax” (GRT) on natural gas for a severance tax as a way to raise millions of dollars for Democrats’ voracious appetite to spend money (see Ploy to Rename PA Severance Tax as “Gross Receipts” Tax and More on PA’s Potential Gross Receipts Tax on NatGas). A GRT taxes the use of natural gas, instead of the production. LibDems would have you believe Big Oil companies and Big Utility companies will bear the brunt of such a tax. Not so. As the Commonwealth Foundation lays out in a recent post, the brunt of such a tax would be borne by low-income families who heat their homes with natural gas. People who heat with natural gas will end up paying the tax because taxes are always paid by consumers and not corporations (the costs are ALWAYS passed on). Here’s a look at how the little guy will get screwed once again if the Dems in PA get their way…
Read More “Proposed NatGas Gross Receipts Tax Targets PA Low-Income Earners”

Pennsylvania legislators went home for the long Fourth of July holiday weekend without a final budget in place. The clock is ticking. The spending part of the budget–some $31.5 billion (a massive amount) has been agreed to by both the Republican-controlled legislature and Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf. However, the budget needs to find another $1.5 billion to fund it–the shortfall in the current plan. Wolf wants “sustainable revenue”–by which he means permanent tax increases on something. Wolf’s preference is to slap a Marcellus Shale-killing severance tax on the natural gas industry. That’s a non-starter for the Republican-controlled legislature–people who actually know how economics work. It does appear the two sides are close to getting the budget passed. This week should tell the tale of how the state plans to raise enough money to bridge the shortfall…
Last Friday MDN told you about the latest plan to tax Pennsylvania natural gas–something called a gross receipts tax (see
Last year Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf thought he could win in a game of “chicken” with Republican majorities in both the PA House and Senate. Wolf tried to ram down their throats a number of tax increases–including a raise in the personal income tax, sales tax, cigarette tax, severance tax–just about any tax you can think of. Wolf lost. The budget was a disaster because he wouldn’t negotiate, wouldn’t compromise, wouldn’t do anything. He was banking on a liberal media to come to his support. In the end, even the media abandoned him as a hardheaded putz. This year Wolf is singing a different tune. He’s not demanding higher taxes and enormously bloated spending increases across the board. However, Wolf is still obstinately insisting on a Marcellus Shale severance tax–even though the industry is on the ropes and in survival mode. Just when we thought he was wising up…
Yesterday the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), the agency charged with keeping tabs on impact fee revenue from shale drillers, announced that impact fee revenue (PA’s version of a severance tax) is going down by $36 million from fees levied in the previous year–to $188 million. That’s the lowest yearly impact fee revenue in the past five years–since the beginning of impact fees in PA. As an aside, we find it interesting that last year when impact revenue was the highest it’s been in five years, the PUC had to be forced to release the numbers, with Republicans leaking the numbers first to force the PUC to give it up (see 
New research just published by Indiana University confirms what those with common sense already knew: If at least some of the fees paid by drillers go into the local township’s coffers instead of the county or state–people in that community are more accepting and favorable to drilling. IU questioned 453 PA residents in June 2014 (takes a long time to publish research) asking a variety of questions. The research shows that the public has more trust that revenues will be spent better by their local municipal government than by the county or state. Don’t you just love it when common sense breaks out? Of course PA’s far-left/liberal governor, Tom Wolf, is tone deaf when it comes to taxing the Marcellus industry. He wants to grab all the money he can and give it to teachers unions. PA has an impact fee which keeps 60% of fees raised local–a plan that works. Wolf wants to add a severance tax on top of the impact fee, which would create the nation’s highest severance tax rate (see
Pittsburgh, PA has two major newspapers–the Post-Gazette and the Tribune-Review. We’re talking general interest newspapers. There’s also the Pittsburgh Business Times, a great paper but niche and focused on business only. Of the two general interest newspapers, the Post-Gazette is obviously owned and operated by liberal Democrats. They tilt somewhere left of Vlad Putin on the editorial page. The Tribune-Review, however, is a balanced paper and not beholden to the Democrat machine in PA the way their rival is. There’s no better way to illustrate that then the Post-Gazette’s love and adoration of current Dem Gov. Tom Wolf and his proposed punitive taxes the Marcellus Shale industry. The Post-Gazette LOVES Wolf’s idea for a severance tax and berates the gas industry for not “doing its part.” The Tribune-Review, on the other hand, takes a more balanced approach. In a recent editorial, the Tribune-Review points out Wolf’s latest severance tax proposal, if passed, would be the highest in the nation. They also point out Wolf’s income tax increase and minimum wage proposal would decimate the state economically…
Not only is PA’s Gov. Wolf stubborn, he’s stupid too. Dangerously so. Wolf and those he has surrounded himself with are hellbent on enacting a severance tax on the Marcellus industry in the state, as a way of paying back teachers’ unions for their support of him in the last election. Wolf, with the aid of willing liars in mainstream media, continuously repeat the same lie: PA is the only oil and gas state without a severance tax. They intentionally ignore the impact fee and corporate income tax on drillers in PA that together adds up to about the same rate of taxation as a severance tax in states like Texas and Louisiana. For the second year running Wolf has proposed a severance tax–this time RAISING it to a supposed rate of 6.5%. Yes, the new tax would allow drillers to deduct whatever impact fees they would still have to pay. The state’s Independent Fiscal Office (IFO) has run the numbers and compared Wolf’s proposal to other states. You know what they found? Wolf’s proposed severance tax would have an effective rate of 8.5%, not 6.5%. It would be the highest such severance tax in the country! Some 54% higher than the effective severance tax rate in either Texas or Louisiana. So tell us, how many drillers will stick around PA and continue to drill with a tax like that? Can you say “ghost town”?…
Talk about intellectual dishonesty and academic incest…The Rockefellar family, behind the latest initiatives to force investors to divest from so-called fossil fuel companies and funders of numerous wacko Big Green initiatives, along with former members of the radical PennFuture organization who now work for far-left PA. Gov. Tom Wolf (PA Secretary of Conservation and Natural Resource Cindy Dunn, and PA Secretary of the Dept. of Environment Protection John Quigley), funded and contributed to a new report from the Brookings Institution that calls on PA to adopt a severance tax. Brookings is a once-proud organization that has stooped to pimping itself out like a cheap whore to anyone with money. They have the nerve to call it a new “study”–like it’s somehow an academic pursuit, beyond questioning–when in fact it’s nothing more than propaganda meant to pressure PA into adopting a Marcellus-killing severance tax. There’s nothing scholarly about it…