Skip to content
Marcellus Drilling News
Account Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Article Index
  • Calendar
  • Advertising
  • User Guide
  • SUBSCRIBE
Marcellus Drilling News
  • Anti-Drilling/Fossil Fuel | Industrywide Issues | Pennsylvania | Regulation | Statewide PA | Taxation

    PA DEP Pushes Back: We Did NOT Undercount Wells for Impact Fee

    January 24, 2013January 24, 2013

    push back A newly-minted Ph.D. from Penn State, Joel Gehman, got his first teaching job last year as an assistant business professor at the University of Alberta in Canada. He wasted no time in addressing the issue of “publish or perish” in academe. In May of 2012, even before he began his official duties at UA, he co-authored and published a paper titled, “Fracking Patents: The Emergence of Patents as Information Containment Tools in Shale Drilling.” The title itself tells you about Dr. Gehman’s proclivities when it comes to the issue of fracking. (Learn more about his views on his blog). This month Dr. Gehman is back as lead author of a new paper published in the journal Environmental Practice titled, “An Analysis of Unconventional Gas Well Reporting under Pennsylvania’s Act 13 of 2012.”

    Dr. Gehman’s new paper makes the strong claim that the DEP did not exploit loopholes in the new Act 13 law to drain every last penny they could via the new impact fee/tax on oil and gas wells, thereby leaving up to $303 million uncollected (see our story Did PA DEP Undercount Act 13 Wells & Forfeit $303M in Revenue?). Michael Krancer, Sec. of the DEP, sent a letter to Gehman on Tuesday with some pretty strong claims of his own…

    Read More “PA DEP Pushes Back: We Did NOT Undercount Wells for Impact Fee”

  • Anti-Drilling/Fossil Fuel | Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | Pennsylvania | Statewide PA

    Controversy Continues Over PA DEP Water Testing Near Frack Sites

    January 24, 2013January 24, 2013

    In November, MDN told you about a new controversy that began when PA State Rep. Jesse White (Democrat from the Pittsburgh area) claimed the PA Dept. of Environmental Protection was knowingly covering up water well testing data that may “prove” fracking activities in some cases are contaminating groundwater supplies (see PA DEP Accused of Skewing Water Tests from Wells Near Drilling). The DEP immediately responded that White and those claiming there’s a cover-up are wrong. The Marcellus Shale Coalition also jumped into the debate to shine a light on White’s anti-drilling tendencies (see MSC Responds to Allegations PA DEP Skews Drilling Water Tests). It does appear White has an ongoing blood feud with Range Resources, but in fairness, he contacted MDN to assert he is not anti-drilling.

    The latest round in this controversy comes from an article that appears in the Beaver County Times on Tuesday. The article is perhaps the best we’ve seen that outlines what the controversy involves (although the article tends to the anti- side). In brief, it’s all about “Suite Codes” and whether or not the DEP intentionally did not order the appropriate tests in some cases of suspected water contamination—and in other cases did not report back full results from tests done. There are three Suite Codes potentially used by the DEP when ordering and reporting on water testing, as described in the article:

    Read More “Controversy Continues Over PA DEP Water Testing Near Frack Sites”

  • Belmont County | Energy Companies | Industrywide Issues | Litigation | Ohio | Oxford Oil Company

    Belmont County Landowners with Lease Sue to Stop Well Drilling

    January 24, 2013January 24, 2013

    A Barnesville (Belmont County), OH couple have sued the company they signed a lease with in 2008, Oxford Oil Company, to prevent Oxford from drilling a new well on a hayfield on their property.

    The details as we know them:

    Read More “Belmont County Landowners with Lease Sue to Stop Well Drilling”

  • Commodity Price | Industrywide Issues

    Marcellus NatGas Production Predicted to Increase 44% by 2014

    January 24, 2013January 24, 2013

    The perennial topic of conversation around the natural gas water cooler is, “How much supply will there be in the next X timeframe, and how will that affect the price of natural gas?”

    Financial advisory firm Raymond James is the latest to weigh in with their thinking on the topic, and it’s no surprise the Marcellus Shale figures big in their thinking about how much supply is coming down the pipeline, and how prices will be affected:

    Read More “Marcellus NatGas Production Predicted to Increase 44% by 2014”

  • Energy Services | Equitrans/EQT Midstream

    EQT Midstream 4Q12: Revenue Up 14%, IPO Complete

    January 24, 2013January 24, 2013

    EQT’s pipeline subsidiary EQT Midstream Partners released their fourth quarter 2012 results today. EQT Midstream has extensive pipeline and compressor plant operations in the Marcellus Shale.

    Although the update is largely about the money and intended for investors (revenues are up 14%), the update does contain a few interesting bits about EQT Midstream’s operations in the Marcellus, including information about the recently acquired Sunrise Pipeline, a federally regulated transmission line that runs from Wetzel County, WV to Greene County, PA:

    Read More “EQT Midstream 4Q12: Revenue Up 14%, IPO Complete”

  • Chesapeake Energy | Energy Companies | Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | Research

    Chesapeake will Allow EPA Access to Well Site for Fracking Study

    January 24, 2013January 24, 2013

    The Wall Street Journal reports that Chesapeake Energy has agreed to allow the federal EPA to access one of their drilling sites to be used as a guinea pig for before and after testing of water supplies near a fracked gas well. The EPA is conducting a years-long study, due to be completed in 2014, to evaluate whether or not they can try and claim fracking affects water. If they can make a case that fracking does affect water supplies, they plan to invoke the federal Clean Water Act to start regulating shale drilling via the back door which would, of course, trample on states’ rights as granted under the Constitution.

    Apparently Chesapeake is willing to “pull back the kimono” and let the EPA have a peak. Their reasoning appears to be, “Hey, there’s nothing to fear since fracking does not affect water supplies, so why not?” From the WSJ:

    Read More “Chesapeake will Allow EPA Access to Well Site for Fracking Study”

  • Best of the Rest

    Marcellus & Utica Shale Story Links: Thu, Jan 24, 2013

    January 24, 2013January 24, 2013

    The “best of the rest” – stories that caught MDN’s eye that you may be interested in reading:

    Read More “Marcellus & Utica Shale Story Links: Thu, Jan 24, 2013”

Search

Get Daily Headlines

Newsletter Optin

Recent MDN Issues

  • May 20, 2026
  • May 19, 2026
  • May 18, 2026
  • May 15, 2026
  • May 14, 2026

List of All Daily Issues

Most Recent Articles

  • Enbridge Proposes Major Expansion of Algonquin Pipe: Project Beacon
  • Constellation Seeks to Keep Boston LNG Terminal Online Long-Term
  • Trump Extends Jones Act Waiver Another 90 Days, Includes LNG
  • McKean County Injection Well Operating Without Permit from PA DEP
  • Duke Energy’s Large-Scale Powergen Expansion Adding 14 GW by 2031
  • So-Called Peak Oil & Gas (Supply or Demand) is Nowhere in Sight
  • MDN’s Energy Stories of Interest: Wed, May 20, 2026
  • BLM Ready to Auction Land in OH Wayne Nat’l Forest for Drilling
  • M-U Projects Potentially Impacted by NextEra/Dominion Merger
  • AlphaGen & ArcLight Close on Buying DC-Area Gas-Fired Power Plant

© 2009-2026 Marcellus Drilling News

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Article Index
  • Calendar
  • Advertising
  • User Guide
  • Subscribe
  • Log In