Trump DOE Cancels 24 “Clean Energy” Projects, Incl. $170M to Heinz
Corporate welfare—the transfer (theft) of money from taxpayers to uber-wealthy corporations, like Kraft Heinz, is particularly loathsome and disgusting. However, it’s widespread, unfortunately. In an effort to undermine fossil energy, the Biden administration shoveled money out the door to corporate cronies so fast nobody could keep track of it all. Biden’s “free money” included a $170 million grant to Kraft Heinz, which would have helped the food manufacturer install heat pumps, solar, biogas, and other loser “renewable” energy solutions at 10 of its facilities in New York, Virginia, Minnesota, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Missouri, and Illinois. Kraft Heinz received $5.9 million of the promised funding in December. It won’t see another dime. Read More “Trump DOE Cancels 24 “Clean Energy” Projects, Incl. $170M to Heinz”
Alice, get ready to go down the rabbit hole into litigation Wonderland. This post is about a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision issued on May 30, 2025. In the case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Game Commission v. Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust, the PA Supremes addressed a question from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals regarding whether a 1908 tax sale of an “unseated” (undeveloped) parcel of land, the Haines Warrant, constituted a “title wash” that divested the subsurface estate owners of their ownership interest. We think the case has broader implications for landowners and drillers with respect to who owns mineral rights that have been separated from surface rights. 
On May 20, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) issued notices of violations to XTO Energy, Inc. (a subsidiary of ExxonMobil) for failing to restore five multi-million gallon shale gas freshwater impoundments it used to support fracking operations in Butler County. The impoundments are required to be restored, which includes liners removed and the area regraded to the original contours, within nine months of their last use. 
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro is a typical liberal Democrat politician. He pretends to be moderate and a supporter of the Marcellus industry in the Keystone State. He is neither. Shapiro claims his proposed energy programs will cut costs for Pennsylvanians. The reverse is true. But we’re not just making blanket, unprovable assertions or opinions about Shapiro’s energy plans. A new study from the Commonwealth Foundation estimates that Shapiro’s energy policies, 
RBN Energy is reporting that ethane and butane exports for Enterprise Products Partners and possibly other NGL exporters are in doubt following a notice received from the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) flagging such exports to China as a security risk. Specifically, ethane and butane exports pose an “unacceptable risk of use in or diversion to a military end use.” RBN’s blunt assessment is this: “The BIS decision has the potential to ruin the U.S. ethane market and disrupt global flows.” 
OTHER U.S. REGIONS: Port of Corpus Christi completes milestone ship channel improvement project; Cheniere inks supply deal with Canadian Natural for SPL expansion project; NATIONAL: Forecasts fuel rally for natural gas futures, spot prices; US targets geothermal projects for emergency permitting; INTERNATIONAL: Oil advances as OPEC+ supply boost vies with geopolitical risk; JP Morgan asks if oil prices are $10 too low or $20 too high; Russian pipeline gas exports to Europe rose 10% m/m in May, data shows; U.S. sanctions threaten Europe’s Russian gas lifeline.