Statewide PA

  • | | | | |

    Fractivists Gear Up to Fight Conversion of Philly Pipe for NatGas

    A far-left group of radicals calling themselves Ending Dirty Gas Exploitation Philadelphia (EDGE Philly) is borrowing a tactic first pioneered by THE Delaware Riverkeeper, to oppose a short pipeline project near Philadelphia. In November, MDN shared the exciting news that an old oil pipeline stretching from Northampton County, PA through Bucks, Montgomery, and Chester counties, terminating in Delaware County at Marcus Hook, had been purchased by a subsidiary of New Jersey Resources and will get converted to flow Marcellus natural gas to the greater Philadelphia region (see Oil Pipeline Near Philly to be Converted to Flow Fracked NatGas). The project/pipeline is called Adelphia Gateway. Adelphia ran an open season–a period of time when shippers can reserve capacity along the pipeline–and got requests for twice the amount of capacity the pipeline will hold (see Converted Pipeline Near Philly Gets 2X More Interest than Capacity). That was more than enough for NJ Resources to move forward with the project. In January NJ Resources filed an official application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to convert the existing pipeline to flow natural gas, and add various facilities (like meter stations) along the way (see Adelphia Gateway Pipeline Near Philly Files with FERC). The irrational fossil fuel haters from EDGE Philly want to stop the project. So they’re coaching as many blind followers as possible to file as “intervenors” in the project–hoping to flood FERC with intervenor applications, slowing down the entire approval process, bringing it to a halt…
    Read More “Fractivists Gear Up to Fight Conversion of Philly Pipe for NatGas”

  • | | | | | |

    Sunoco LP Pays PA DEP $12.6M to Resume ME2 Pipeline Construction

    In what can only be considered a government shakedown, Sunoco Logistics Partners has agreed to pay a massive (historically high) $12.6 million fine to the PA Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) for “permit violations related to the construction of the Mariner East 2 pipeline project.” The fine, along with a “stringent compliance review” going forward, gives the DEP enough confidence to allow Sunoco to resume construction on the ME2 project, which has been halted since January 3rd (see PA DEP Caves to Big Green Pressure, Stops All Work on ME2 Pipeline). Last Friday Sunoco appealed the DEP’s stop work order to a special court set up to hear appeals of DEP decisions (see Sunoco Appeals DEP’s ME2 Pipe Suspension to Enviro Hearing Board). DEP couldn’t risk having their order overturned–not when there’s a shakedown in progress! With respect to the “deal,” Sunoco said, in so many words, that while they (strongly) disagree with the DEP’s statements in making the deal, Sunoco is willing to pay the fine so they can get back to work and finish the project. A cost of doing business in PA, apparently. Beginning today, thousands of people who had been thrown out of work by the DEP order will resume their jobs. All it took was 12.6 big ones to make it happen…
    Read More “Sunoco LP Pays PA DEP $12.6M to Resume ME2 Pipeline Construction”

  • | | |

    PA Superior Court Upholds Challenge to “Title Washing”

    Ever hear of “title washing?” MDN alerted readers about this funny sounding practice that has to do with mineral rights in Pennsylvania, with possible implications for landowners and drillers, back in 2016 (see PA Supreme Court Decides “Title Washing” OK in Mineral Rights Case). In 2016, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a 5-0 ruling that upholds the practice of title washing in the Keystone State. What is it, and how does it affect landowners and drillers? In the case of Herder Spring Hunting Club v. Keller there had been a tax sale in 1935 for a property in Centre County, PA where the mineral rights had previously been separated. Prior to 1948 if mineral rights that had been separated were not properly recorded (it was incumbent on the owner of the subsurface rights to ensure the sale was recorded at the assessor’s office), and the surface land was later sold, both the mineral rights (subsurface) and the surface land became part of the sale. If the rights owner didn’t record the sale, they lost their ownership rights. That, in essence, is title washing. After 1948 a law prevented this from happening, so such cases only apply to land sold before 1948. The PA Supremes upheld title washing in the 2016 case. Another case, Woodhouse Hunting Club, Inc. v. Hoyt, made a run at challenging title washing–this time in Pennsylvania Superior Court. However, the Superiors have sided with the Supremes in shooting down the challenge…
    Read More “PA Superior Court Upholds Challenge to “Title Washing””

  • | | |

    “Talk About It” Substitutes for Real Science in Marcellus Study

    This is one of those zany Friday kind of stories. Yet another so-called study on the Marcellus Shale industry recently caught our attention. We’ve often pointed out the “bought and paid for” research that abounds on shale drilling. This one goes to a whole new metaphysical plane. Instead of researching and drawing conclusions from research data, the recently published study “Engaging over data on fracking and water quality” (University of Pittsburgh and Penn State University) talks about talking about the issue of Marcellus Shale drilling. Yeah. How do you *feel* about drilling? Here, lie down on this sofa while we ask you some questions about your childhood and fracking practices. OK, so maybe a study about how people talk about the issues involved with Marcellus Shale drilling isn’t so far-fetched–if such a “study” were to appear in the Journal of Idiosyncratic Sociology. This “study” however, was published in the journal Science. As in hard science–not social science. So now it no longer matters what real science finds–whether or not fracking actually pollutes water and air. Whether or not living near a fracking site will stunt your growth. Whether or not fracking carves up forests or increases automobile accidents or any of a plethora of other issues. What REALLY matters is what you *think* about all that. That’s what now passes for science in Science…
    Read More ““Talk About It” Substitutes for Real Science in Marcellus Study”

  • | | | |

    NEPA Republican Lawmaker Intros Marcellus Health Registry Bill

    In 2011, then-Gov. Tom Corbett’s Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission filed a final report with 96 recommendations (see PA Marcellus Shale Advisory Commission Final Report with 96 Recommendations). One of those recommendations is to establish a population-based health registry. The aim would be to collect and evaluate clinical data from health care providers and monitor citizens living near drilling sites. Sounded good to us then, still sounds good now. One of the early attempts at this came from the private sector. Geisinger Health Systems proposed to use data already in the files to begin tracking potential issues related to shale drilling (see PA Marcellus Health Study by Geisinger Turns into Data Warehouse). But as we later learned, Geisinger was in it for the money (can’t blame them). They wanted $24 million and didn’t get it, so that effort flopped. A Republican State legislator from Scranton, PA, Rep. Karen Boback, is attempting to reignite interest in the health registry issue. On Monday, Rep. Boback introduced House Bill (HB) 2055 (full copy below) that would establish a health registry to collect health-related data from those living near shale drilling. The PA Dept. of Health would be the agency tasked with the data collection. Rep. Boback figures it will take $1 million per year to fund the initiative, far less than what Geisinger wanted…
    Read More “NEPA Republican Lawmaker Intros Marcellus Health Registry Bill”

  • | | | | | |

    PennEast Files Eminent Domain Against 44 Landowners, Wants Marshals

    As we told you last week, Monday (Feb. 5) was the final day for landowners who live along the path of the PennEast Pipeline to accept an offer from PennEast to lease their land for the pipeline (see PennEast Pipe Gives Holdout Landowners Feb 5 Deadline to Sign). The landowners have had nearly three years to deal in good faith negotiations with PennEast, and their time has now run out. On Tuesday PennEast regrettably was forced to file eminent domain lawsuits against 44 holdout landowners. PennEast also asked the court to approve the use of federal marshals to protect workers due to threats the company has received from landowners and radical antis who say they will hassle workers and block construction. A prudent request given the sometimes violent nature of the Big Green movement (e.g. Dakota Access Pipeline violence). Here’s the latest on PennEast, as they get ready to begin construction…
    Read More “PennEast Files Eminent Domain Against 44 Landowners, Wants Marshals”

  • | | |

    PA Gov. Wolf Broken Record: Proposes Budget with Severance Tax

    Here we go again. Supposedly striking a more “cooperative tone,” Pennsylvania Gov. Wolf’s sympathetic media buddies are trying to spin, as best they can, Wolf’s state budget proposal delivered yesterday. Wolf is a hyper-partisan who, in this latest budget, continues to demand a $250 million/year Marcellus-killing severance tax–on top of the existing impact tax. It is the only new tax in the budget, a budget that increases the already wildly overspent state budget by an additional $1 billion! Spending in Harrisburg is completely out of control–a disaster. The last governor (frankly the only governor in a generation) who tried to correct Harrisburg’s voracious appetite to spend more, Tom Corbett, got voted out of office after one term. Wolf is hoping to score a second term by continuing his Santa Claus routine–by pulling money from the pockets of those who earn it (landowners and drillers) to give away to those who don’t (teacher’s unions in Philadelphia). We are not exaggerating–this is fact. In his proposed $32.9 million budget, Wolf claims a “modest” severance tax will generate $248.7 million this year, and ALL OF IT will go to “education”–meaning teachers and their unions in the Philadelphia region. It’s political payback for their ongoing support and for their efforts to get Wolf elected in the first place. Why is this FACT not discussed openly in the media? It is repugnant to use the gun barrel of the state to steal the wealth of one group and transfer it to another as political patronage. Yet that is Wolf’s mission. Republican legislators reacted negatively to Wolf’s wildly overspent budget (and severance tax), as did the Marcellus industry…
    Read More “PA Gov. Wolf Broken Record: Proposes Budget with Severance Tax”

  • | | |

    PA Senate Passes Meaningless Resolution to “Study” Slow DEP Permits

    This is what passes for “action” in the swamp of Harrisburg. Over the past couple of years the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) has gotten slower and slower in issuing permits for shale drilling–for simple things, like erosion permits a driller needs to push dirt around to create a well pad. The DEP has a policy of issuing erosion and sedimentation permits 14 days from the date of application. As of last summer it was taking the DEP over 250 days to issue those permits (see More Pushback on PA Senate Plan to Fix Slow DEP Permit Reviews). The drilling industry has been loudly pushing for a change. The DEP says it has fewer people on staff and that’s the reason for the slowdown. The thing is, the number of requests for permits has gone down too–so that particular argument doesn’t hold a lot of water. PA House Republicans have introduced a number of bills to “fix” the DEP, not least of which is a bill introduced that allows certified third parties to assist the DEP in reviewing permit applications (see Bill Introduced to Fix PA DEP’s Extreme Delays Issuing Permits). The PA Senate wants in on the “fix DEP” action too. A Senate Democrat, John Yudichak from Wilkes-Barre, proposed a resolution to study the problem (see PA Senate Ctte Sends “Study Slow DEP” Resolution for Full Vote). A resolution to study something is swamp code for “don’t do a darned thing about it.” Yudichak’s meaningless resolution passed the full Senate yesterday. PA Senators can now all pat themselves on the back, pretending they’ve actually done something to address this critical problem when in fact, they’ve done nothing at all…
    Read More “PA Senate Passes Meaningless Resolution to “Study” Slow DEP Permits”

  • | | | | |

    M-U Gathering Pipelines Blamed for Killing “Ancient” Salamanders

    The Eastern hellbender is the largest salamander in North America, reaching lengths of up to 24 inches. It’s also the official amphibian of Pennsylvania. Photo: Dave Herasimtschuk / Freshwaters Illustrated

    (Sigh.) Here we go again. An in-depth news story appearing on the PBS website Allegheny Front theorizes that the presence of natural gas gathering pipelines–run to individual shale wells–are causing a decrease in the population of hellbenders. The theory is that as more and more pipelines are installed under creeks and streams throughout the region (in western PA and easter OH), the construction process muddies the streams and kills aquatic life, including the hellbender. The hellbender is a giant salamander–growing to an average of 15 inches long. Ugly suckers–so ugly they’re cute! OK, so a pipeline gets installed and the water is muddy for a day or two and maybe it kills a hellbender or two, what’s the big deal? Are they an endangered species? No, they are not. They are, however, considered to be “near-threatened”–meaning any decade now they *may* get added to the “threatened” list (but still not endangered). The idea is, of course, to avoid killing enough of a species like the hellbender so that it ends up on a threatened or endangered list. So are pipelines having a negative impact on hellbender populations? The article wants you think so, but actually, there’s zero evidence of any kind of impact by pipelines on hellbender populations. Instead of scientific steak to show a connection between pipelines and hellbender populations, the article serves up anecdotal Cheetos of scary pictures of pipelines being installed. There is no connection between pipeline construction and hellbender populations–that’s the bottom line when you read the following story…
    Read More “M-U Gathering Pipelines Blamed for Killing “Ancient” Salamanders”

  • | | |

    PA DEP’s Short-Term Solution to Get More Help – Hire 92 Interns

    Everybody has a “fix” for the chronically slow Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP). The DEP has a policy of issuing erosion and sedimentation permits for shale drilling 14 days from the date of application. At last check, it was taking the agency over 250 days to issue those permits. The Marcellus industry has been pressuring the PA legislature for a fix. As we noted in a companion story today, the PA Senate’s “fix” is to study it (see PA Senate Passes Meaningless Resolution to “Study” DEP Slow Permits). The PA House is more proactive, with a series of 5 bills that would, among other things, enlist the help of independent third parties to take up the slack (see PA House Advances “Fix DEP & Other Agencies” Plan with 5 Bills). Even PA Gov. Tom Wolf got in the act, offering his own solution, which involves hiking fees and hiring more people (see PA Gov Wolf Floats Plan to Fix DEP Slow Drilling Permits: Hike Fees). Perhaps the DEP has found a way to fix itself. The DEP recently posted 92 openings for paid internships. Many of the openings are for “Engineering and Scientific Technical Interns” for which the intern will earn $13.23/hour. While some of the openings are in the coal program, or the water resources program, many of positions (we’d say most, judging by a random check) are in the oil and gas program. But wait, the DEP is on a tight budget, right? They don’t have an extra two nickels to rub together. That’s what we always hear. That’s why fees need to go up, right? Somehow the DEP has been able to find money for an intern program. If 92 interns work for a 3-month period earning $13.23 per hour (40 hour weeks), that’s more than $580,000. Maybe the DEP will pull the money from one of the slush funds Republicans wanted to empty as part of balancing the budget? At any rate, here’s the deets on becoming an intern for the PA DEP…
    Read More “PA DEP’s Short-Term Solution to Get More Help – Hire 92 Interns”

  • | | |

    PA DEP Plans to Raise Marcellus Well Permit Fee by 250%

    Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf’s Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP), the agency charged with overseeing oil and gas drilling in the state, has “blindsided” the shale industry with a proposal to hike the fee required when submitting an application to drill a new shale well. The current fee is $5,000. The proposed new fee is $12,500–or 2.5 times greater (i.e. 250% higher). The DEP Oil and Gas Technical Advisory Board (TAB) is scheduled to meet next week, on Feb. 14, to discuss the permit fee increase. The fee funds the oil and gas program within the DEP. Wells must be visited and inspected throughout their life–decades after they are initially drilled. The permit fee is a one-time, up-front fee. Over the past couple of years the number of new wells getting drilled has decreased (although in 2017 it went back up, see PA Shale Wells Drilled Soars 56% in 2017; Impact Fee Up $5,400/Well). Because there have been fewer wells drilled in recent years, there’s a lot less money in the DEP’s budget for well inspectors. Hence the plan to hike the fee. The industry does not object to a measured increase–but going up 250% is “excessive” and not called for, according to the Marcellus Shale Coalition. In addition to the permit fee hike, the TAB meeting will also hold a discussion on finalizing new GP-5 and GP-5A General Permits to control methane emissions from oil and gas operations. Buckle up, the next TAB meeting looks like it may get heated…
    Read More “PA DEP Plans to Raise Marcellus Well Permit Fee by 250%”

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Sunoco Appeals DEP’s ME2 Pipe Suspension to Enviro Hearing Board

    PA State Sen. Andy Dinniman

    In early January, the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) issued an order shutting down all construction for the Sunoco Logistics Partners Mariner East 2 (ME2) pipeline project (see PA DEP Caves to Big Green Pressure, Stops All Work on ME2 Pipeline). The DEP claims Sunoco had violated the conditions of the permits that allow it to drill and trench for the project. In particular, the DEP is hot and bothered about drilling mud spills associated with underground horizontal directional drilling (HDD). The DEP said Suonco can restart work when/if certain conditions are met. So far the DEP has not allowed Sunoco to restart work. In the meantime, thousands of workers are in the unemployment line, and have been since Jan. 3rd. Sunoco has just appealed the DEP’s cease and desist order to the PA Environmental Hearing Board–a special court set up to hear appeals of DEP decisions. Sunoco lays out their case in a filing (below) for why the DEP is incorrect in issuing their stop work order…
    Read More “Sunoco Appeals DEP’s ME2 Pipe Suspension to Enviro Hearing Board”

  • | | |

    PA Shale Wells Drilled Soars 56% in 2017; Impact Fee Up $5,400/Well

    In early 2012, Pennsylvania enacted the most sweeping rework of oil and gas laws in the state in decades (see Gov. Corbett Signs New Marcellus Drilling Law). Called Act 13, one of the provisions of the law is an “impact fee” collected on each horizontal shale well drilled. The fee is intended to offset the impacts of drilling in places where drilling happens, hence the name. However, in order to get enough support to pass Act 13, politics were played and 40% of the “fee” got re-allocated to non-impact uses–i.e., 40% of the fee became a tax (see PA’s New Tax on Drilling (er Sorry, Impact Fee)). In reality, PA’s impact “fee” is the equivalent of a severance tax. The main difference is that the fee is calculated according to a sliding schedule based on how long a well has been around. Beginning with the first year a shale well is drilled, and every year thereafter, drillers pay a set fee, regardless of how much gas is produced. If a driller drills a well but doesn’t complete it in year one, that driller still pays the same (very steep) fee, regardless of no production. In that way, an impact fee is superior to a severance tax as a revenue generator for the state. Impact fees are paid for 15 years. In setting up the somewhat complicated schedule for how much a driller will pay, it depends on how old the well is. The PA Public Utility Commission (PUC), the agency in charge of assessing and collecting the fee, periodically adjusts the fee schedule up to account for inflation. The fee assessed depends on how much the price of natural gas is selling for at the benchmark Henry Hub trading point (in Louisiana). In 2017 (which collected fees from drilling in 2016), if the price of natgas at Henry Hub averaged between $2.26 – $2.99 for the year (which it did, at $2.46/Mcf), the impact fee for a newly drilled well during the year of 2016 was $45,300. In 2018 (collecting fees from 2017), the price of natgas at Henry Hub was in the next higher bracket, averaging between $3.00 – $4.99 (2017 averaged $3.11/Mcf). So the fee for first year wells drilled last year will be $50,700–which is $5,400 higher than a driller would have paid the previous year. Our point: Drillers in PA pay big bucks in “fees” (i.e. taxes) to drill in the state. Slapping a severance tax on top of the impact fee would be a disaster, virtually shutting down any new Marcellus drilling. Yet that’s what Gov. Wolf and his Democrat comrades insist on doing. Below is the newly released impact fee schedule for 2018 (covering wells drilled in 2017), along with details on the whopping increase in the number of wells drilled in 2017 vs. 2016…
    Read More “PA Shale Wells Drilled Soars 56% in 2017; Impact Fee Up $5,400/Well”

  • | | | | | |

    PennEast Pipe Forced to Do It Hard Way – Using Eminent Domain

    As we told you last week, today (Monday, Feb. 5) is the final day for landowners who live along the path of the PennEast Pipeline to accept an offer from PennEast to lease their land for the pipeline (see PennEast Pipe Gives Holdout Landowners Feb 5 Deadline to Sign). The landowners have had near three years to deal in good faith negotiations with PennEast, and now time has run out. On Friday, a group of holdout landowners symbolically tore up their PennEast lease offers in a vain media stunt. Starting later this week they will receive something via certified mail they better not tear up–a court summons for an eminent domain proceeding. It’s a shame when it has to come to that, but denial is a strong emotion. Now it’s off to court they go where they’ll get a splash of reality…
    Read More “PennEast Pipe Forced to Do It Hard Way – Using Eminent Domain”

  • | | |

    PA IFO Says 2017 Impact Fee Revenue Near Record High

    Since 2012, Pennsylvania has collected the equivalent of a severance tax from Marcellus Shale drillers via something called an impact fee. Same concept as a severance tax. You drill a well, gas comes out, you pay a tax. Except with an impact fee you pay whether or not anything comes out of the ground (a more reliable source of tax revenue than a severance tax). The impact fee quickly started to generate hundreds of millions of dollars a year in extra revenue for Pennsylvania–60% of which goes back to the communities where drilling happens (which Philadelphia politicians hate), and 40% of which goes to the black hole of Harrisburg for redistribution (which Philadelphia politicians love). Drilling began to slow in 2014, and crashed in 2015/2016, with low low commodity prices for natgas. As the price went down, so too did the number of new wells drilled. Impact fee revenue (which is delayed a year) also went down. The impact fee doled out this year is based on revenues raised in 2017. The PA Independent Fiscal Office (IFO) does a pretty good job of guesstimating how much impact fee revenue will be generated. Last July, the IFO predicted impact fee revenue from 2017 would end up being around $222 million in revenue (see IFO Predicts PA Impact Fees for 2017 Will Soar, Near Record High). Now that the year is in the can and production reports are rolling in, the IFO now predicts impact fee revenue will end up at $219.3 million. The all-time high for a single year’s impact fee revenue was 2013, when it was $225.7 million. Looks like 2017 will come within a whisker of that record. Meaning higher levels of new drilling is now “back” in the PA Marcellus…
    Read More “PA IFO Says 2017 Impact Fee Revenue Near Record High”

  • | | |

    PA Senate Ctte Passes Resolution to Restore Drilling in State Parks

    On Tuesday, Pennsylvania State Senate Resolution 104 passed in the Senate Environmental Resources and Energy Committee (party line vote, Republicans voted for, Democrats against). SR 104, introduced by Sen. Camera Bartolotta, urges PA Gov. Tom Wolf to get off his rear-end and reauthorize drilling in PA state forest land. The bill stands a good chance of being passed by the full Senate, which has the radicals at PennFuture up in arms. They issued a press release (i.e. marching orders to slavish Democrat Senators) to oppose the resolution. Frankly, they don’t have anything to worry about. As we pointed out yesterday with respect to the Senate’s so-called bipartisan resolution to study the sloooooow way DEP issues permits, resolutions aren’t worth the paper they’re written on (see PA Senate Ctte Sends “Study Slow DEP” Resolution for Full Vote). A resolution is a suggestion–it does not have the weight of law. Wolf can (and almost certainly will), ignore it. Resolutions are an exercise in futility. Still, it may score a political point or two–illuminating how Wolf is blocking an important revenue source from being tapped…
    Read More “PA Senate Ctte Passes Resolution to Restore Drilling in State Parks”