Will Marcellus/Utica Grow Fast Enough to Offset Declines Elsewhere?
What if a couple of really smart analysts who work next to each other, guys who challenge each other every day, analysts who study and focus on natural gas production, were to pull the curtain back and reveal to the world what kinds of discussion and repartee they engage in? In particular, disclose their discussions and debate about the Marcellus/Utica? For those of us who eat/sleep/breath shale energy in the northeast, that would be wicked cool. And that’s just what MDN editor Jim Willis was treated to at S&P Global Platts’ Benposium East event in New York this past Wednesday. Luke Jackson, senior energy analyst with Platts Analytics, and Jeff Moore, also a senior energy analyst with Platts Analytics (the Bentek Products division) both live and work in Denver, CO. Their session at Benposium was titled, “Opposing Views–Northeast Production: Boom or Bust?” The two decided it would spice up what is normally a pretty dry conference presentation by standing on the stage and conducting a classic Oxford-style debate, where a motion is offered and one person argues “for” the motion, the other “against.” The motion they put forward was this: “Will Northeast production remain the sole engine of US natural gas production growth in the next 1-3 years, offsetting declines from the rest of the US and allowing overall US production to push higher?” In other words, can the Marcellus/Utica keep expanding production fast enough that it offsets declining production in other plays, or will those other plays need to increase their output too–to meet growing US demand? Luke argued for the motion and Jeff against. What was the conclusion? Keep reading! The boys used a dynamite PowerPoint slide deck. We asked for and got a copy of it and share it with you below. You need to take time to review the slides–they are awesome! Loaded with details. Below we also have some of our notes–quips and tidbits of information that caught our attention as the boys debated…
Read More “Will Marcellus/Utica Grow Fast Enough to Offset Declines Elsewhere?”


Peters Township, the most populous township in Washington County, PA, is one of the seven selfish towns that sued the state over the zoning provisions in the Act 13 law, eventually winning at the PA Supreme Court level (see
At last week’s Shale Insight conference in Pittsburgh, this this past Wednesday at Platts’ Benposium East conference in New York, there was one topic of conversation that pretty much dominated the discussion: pipelines. Without new “takeaway” capacity in the northeast, we’re in trouble. Many types of people watch the pipeline space for varying reasons. Investors keep an eye on it because they want to invest, or they’ve invested in producers who need to get their gas (and oil) to market. Upstream (drillers) are vitally interested. Midstream (pipeline) companies are interested, needless to say. But so too are the construction companies, much of whose livelihood depends on building the pipelines. So it makes perfect sense that an industry magazine like Construction Equipment Guide would run an article updating their readers on the status of various pipeline projects. Most of the projects in the list are in the northeast, or somehow connected to production coming from the northeast. Below is their helpful roundup listing important, major projects–with a description and the current status of the project…
Yesterday MDN reported that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has essentially gutted the rest of the Act 13 drilling law passed in 2012 (see
Following up on yesterday’s Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to eviscerate the rest of the 2012 Act 13 drilling law (see 
Since before Aubrey McClendon left the helm at Chesapeake Energy, the company has been controversial and to one degree or another, in hot water. Legally. You’ve read plenty on MDN about who’s sued Chessy, over royalties, over collusion on land deals, over nonpayments to suppliers. You’ve also read about various investigations by various government entities into Chesapeake and their practices. It appears like it’s all reaching a fevered pitch. Yesterday Chesapeake filed disclosure forms with the Securities and Exchange Commission which says the U.S. Dept. of Justice, a number of states, and even the U.S. Postal Service have served the company with subpoenas for information. In essence, everyone has subpoenaed Chesapeake for everything…
The “best of the rest” – stories that caught MDN’s eye that you may be interested in reading. In today’s lineup: 5 takeaways from Shale Insight; PA cracker construction moves ahead at fast pace; natgas pipeline network to reach capacity in 6 mos; gas drillers could see $4/Mcf in 2017, for a short time; OPEC’s “truce on oil prices” may not last long; Chesapeake looks to sell the Haynesville for $1B; western Canadian gas may go east for export as LNG; and more!