CONSOL Energy 2Q15: Marcellus Production Up 64%, CNX Rev Down 12%
CONSOL Energy released their second quarter 2015 operating and financial update today. No mention of the pressure they are currently under by their #1 shareholder to spin off or sell off the gas drilling division (see CONSOL’s #1 Stockholder Says Spin Off CNX Gas…or Sell It). There are some bright spots from CONSOL for 2Q15, including a 64% increase in Marcellus Shale production (39 billion cubic feet equivalent in 2Q15) and a 524% increase in Utica Shale production (1.7 Bcfe in 2Q14, 10.6 Bcfe in 2Q15). If you read through the update you’ll find CONSOL believes Utica dry gas may be where they focus their future efforts, given recent results from some of their drilling. CONSOL is a complicated company–a lot of their operations and revenue deal with coal. It was a coal company long before it began drilling for natural gas. To analyze their financials–separating out the gas from the coal–is not easy. What we can tell you is that revenue from natural gas, NGLs and oil went down year over year, from $229.7 million in 2Q14 to $201.9 million in 2Q15 (12%), which isn’t nearly as bad as some of the other drillers in the Marcellus/Utica…
Read More “CONSOL Energy 2Q15: Marcellus Production Up 64%, CNX Rev Down 12%”
Last Friday during the Cabot Oil & Gas quarterly earnings call update with analysts, Cabot’s CEO Dan Dinges provided an important update on the Constitution Pipeline, a 125-mile pipeline that will stretch from the gas fields of Susquehanna County, PA into New York, to Schoharie County. It is a critically needed pipeline to get Cabot’s natural gas in Susquehanna County to markets throughout the northeast and New England. Although Williams is the lead company building the pipeline, Cabot is the other primary partner in the project. Currently the Constitution is 100% FERC authorized and they have 100% of the rights of way leases signed for the project. The only hold-up is the New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation in granting 401 Water Quality Certificates that allows the Constitution to lay pipe through and under swamps, creeks and other bodies of water. According to Dinges, they expect NY to issue those permits any day now…
Here’s one flying under the radar that we didn’t know about–until now. In the spring of 2013 Magnum Hunter Resources (MHR), a driller now focused totally on the Marcellus and Utica Shale region, dismissed it’s accounting firm. Apparently some investors didn’t like that action and accused MHR’s senior management and board of directors of “breaches of fiduciary duties and other matters.” The investors filed lawsuits in seven different courts alleging misconduct. As of June 22, the last of those lawsuits was dismissed. In fact, all of the lawsuits filed have been dismissed and MHR paid out zero dollars to settle. Yes, it cost the company big money to defend themselves, but they held firm and didn’t cave and in the end they were exonerated from any wrongdoing…
We have plenty of EQT news today, but none of it is (for us) as big as this: EQT finished fracking their very first Utica Shale well in Greene County, PA last week, a well that they call “the most technically challenging well” they’ve ever drilled. But man oh man was it worth it! The EQT Utica well is gargantuan. It is the new reigning #1 champ for any on-shore shale well anywhere in the world that we’re aware of when it comes to production. The EQT Utica well produced a truly astonishing initial production (IP) of 72.9 million cubic feet of natural gas per day (MMcf/d). The previous record-holder was a Range Resources Utica well in Washington County, PA at 59 MMcf/d (see 
The plot thickens. Last week MDN was the first, and until now the only, source reporting on rumors that CONSOL Energy may sell it’s CNX Gas division (see 
Two Butler County, PA landowners with a combined 245.7 acres of land leased to XTO Energy have sued XTO claiming that XTO is breaking the lease agreement by paying royalties below 1/8 of what XTO receives in revenue for the gas. So far we’ve heard about Chesapeake Energy being the focus of these types of lawsuits for their shenanigans of inflating post-production costs from the pipeline company and then receiving a “kick back” of investments by the same pipeline company (see