It’s War: ETE vs. Obama’s Army Corps of (Politicized) Engineers
As we pointed out last week, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)–which is supposed to be an organization of, well, engineers–has gone hard-left political, no doubt under the direction of Lord Obama (see Army Corps of Engineers Turns Political in Dakota Access Fight). The USACE has taken to leveraging a sycophantic media to boost its message that Energy Transfer Equity, the company building the Dakota Access Pipeline, should stop building the pipeline (which is already 90% built) because it might hurt the feelings of paid mobsters who are protesting it. Our concern with the project is that the same mobsters protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline have promised to come to the Marcellus/Utica next (see Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters Turn Violent; Coming Here Next?). In addition to using the media to rally its cause, the USACE has just announced it will not, for now, grant a permit to cross under Lake Oahe in North Dakota. ETE is firing back with a caustic press release calling out the USACE as unjust lawbreakers. Yeah, it’s open war now–and Trump can’t assume office fast enough to put an end to the horse manure being pedaled by the Army Corps of Politicized Engineers…
Read More “It’s War: ETE vs. Obama’s Army Corps of (Politicized) Engineers”

Yesterday MDN’s favorite government agency, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), issued our favorite monthly report–the Drilling Productivity Report (DPR). The DPR is the EIA’s best guess, based on expert data crunchers, as to how much each of the U.S.’s seven major shale plays will produce for both oil and natural gas in the coming month. Last month was a bit of a surprise, with the Marcellus reversing the trend and producing more gas than it did the month before (see 
In March we highlighted the issue of abandoned oil and natural gas wells in Pennsylvania (see 
For a number of years we’ve had our eye on Fairmont Brine Processing, headquartered in Fairmont, WV. We originally started writing about the company in 2010 when it was AOP Clearwater (see
We shudder to think what would have been, if just a few more votes had gone the other way last Tuesday. Last week we authored an article in which we stated, “We don’t think it’s a stretch to say that energy voters in PA handed Trump the White House” (see
The big Texas law firm Bracewell, which until earlier this year was Bracewell & Giuliani (Rudy left in January), has put together an helpful analysis of what changes we can expect under a President Trump Administration. Although they tackle a number of areas, we were interested to read their predictions for what will be happening with energy and the environment under President Trump. What’s in store for pipelines? Obama’s Clean Power Plan? EPA’s onerous regulations? The Bracewell legal beagles haul out their crystal ball and give us a glimpse…
The “best of the rest” – stories that caught MDN’s eye that you may be interested in reading. In today’s lineup: Utica Shale picks up funding gaps for OH public schools; court hears arguments in 3 shale cases; will Trump end Williams pipeline delays?; where Trump will make an immediate impact on the energy sector; will Trump’s stance with Mexico affect gas prices?; Jamaica eyes regional LNG hub; OPEC says no $60 oil until 2020; and more!