EQT Corp

  • | | | |

    Corp Raider Continues to Trash Talk EQT/Rice Merger, Vote Set Nov 9

    The disgusting corporate raiders at Jana Partners are fighting to the bitter end in their attempt to stop the merger/takeover of Rice Energy by EQT. In June EQT and Rice Energy announced that EQT will buy out and merge in Rice Energy, to create (in EQT) the largest natural gas-producing company in the United States (see EQT Buys Rice Energy in $8.2B Deal, Becomes #1 Gas Producer in US). A few weeks later, so-called “activist investor” (i.e. corporate raider) Jana Partners, in league with the Cohen family (Atlas Energy) started a proxy fight to block EQT’s takover/merger with Rice (see Proxy Fight: Jana Partners, Atlas Tries to Stop EQT/Rice Deal). Jana is the same company that recently helped Amazon in its hostile takeover of grocery company Whole Foods. Unfortunately (for Jana), their strategy isn’t working this time around. Over the past few weeks Jana has sent a couple of nasty letters to EQT’s board, making some rather wild claims. The tone of Jana’s communication is becoming more shrill as time goes on, as desperation sets in and a vote by EQT shareholders on the deal draws near (Nov. 9). The problem is the financial press picks up on these wild claims and repeats them, so yesterday EQT felt it necessary to (once again) respond and set the record straight–to debunk the lies Jana is spreading about the deal and about EQT’s past performance…
    Read More “Corp Raider Continues to Trash Talk EQT/Rice Merger, Vote Set Nov 9”

  • | | | |

    EQT Raises $3B in IOUs as Down Payment for Rice Energy Purchase

    On Wednesday, EQT announced the company has floated $3 billion (yikes!) of IOUs–called “notes” in the financial industry–with various due dates and interest rates payable, in order to make a cash payment due as part of their purchase of Rice Energy. The total deal is worth $8.2 billion, with EQT paying $6.7 billion and assuming Rice’s existing debt of $1.5 billion (see EQT Buys Rice Energy in $8.2B Deal, Becomes #1 Gas Producer in US). This deal is moving ahead, over the objections of two different corporate raiders who own a considerable amount of EQT stock (see Proxy Fight: Jana Partners, Atlas Tries to Stop EQT/Rice Deal and Under Pressure, EQT Moves Up Timeline to Explore Splitting Co.). In addition to raising $3 billion in cash from IOUs, EQT is also tapping into its line of credit and the money it has socked away in its checking account to get this deal done…
    Read More “EQT Raises $3B in IOUs as Down Payment for Rice Energy Purchase”

  • | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Top 10 Drillers in All of PA, by Number of Permits Issued

    Yesterday we brought you the “Top 10” drillers in southwestern Pennsylvania, as ranked by the number of permits issued (see Top 10 Drillers in SWPA, by Number of Permits Issued). Today we’re bringing you the Top 10 list of drillers by number of permits issued for the entire state of PA. As you might imagine, the picture statewide is quite a bit different from looking at only SWPA. Yes, some of the same companies are in both lists–but only three are in both lists (Range Resources, EQT and Rice Energy). Our Top 10 list is extracted from a list prepared by the (must read) Pittsburgh Business Times…
    Read More “Top 10 Drillers in All of PA, by Number of Permits Issued”

  • | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Top 10 Drillers in SWPA, by Number of Permits Issued

    Every now and again it’s fun to take a look at a “Top 10” list. Here’s one for you. How about a Top 10 List for drillers in southwestern PA, in Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Clarion, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lawrence, Washington, and Westmoreland counties. This Top 10 list ranks drillers by how many shale well permits they’ve been granted. The list is extracted from a Top 40 list prepared by the (must read) Pittsburgh Business Times. Can you guess which 10 drillers are in the Top 10? How about the Top 1? It may come as no surprise that Range Resources, the very first company to drill a Marcellus Shale well (in 2004), has received the most permits to drill in SWPA. Here’s the full Top 10 list, with some interesting extra details…
    Read More “Top 10 Drillers in SWPA, by Number of Permits Issued”

  • | | | |

    Under Pressure, EQT Moves Up Timeline to Explore Splitting Co.

    A second corporate raider is now making trouble for EQT and its planned purchase of/merger with with Rice Energy. In June, EQT and Rice Energy announced that EQT will buy out and merge in Rice Energy, to create (in EQT) the largest natural gas-producing company in the United States (see EQT Buys Rice Energy in $8.2B Deal, Becomes #1 Gas Producer in US). A few weeks after the announced merger, so-called “activist investor” (i.e. corporate raider) Jana Partners, in league with the Cohen family (Atlas Energy) started a proxy fight to block EQT’s takover/merger with Rice Energy (see Proxy Fight: Jana Partners, Atlas Tries to Stop EQT/Rice Deal). Instead of buying Rice, Jana is demanding that EQT split itself into two companies–upstream (drilling) and midstream (pipelines). Jana is now joined by a second group, a group that holds 4% of EQT’s outstanding stock–D.E. Shaw Group. Shaw is headed up by former Elliott Management head and corporate raider Quentin Koffey. As a reminder, raiders buy enough stock to get themselves a seat or two on the board of directors, so they can force a company to sell assets and fire people to drive up the price of the stock, lining their pockets because the raiders then sell the stock after the price goes up, moving on to the next target. Disgusting. And now Shaw, perhaps in league with Jana, is ganging up on EQT. So it’s no surprise that EQT has had to respond by issuing a statement that they’ve “accelerated” the timeline to explore the issue both Jana and Shaw are demanding–that the company split itself in two–upstream (drilling) and midstream (pipelines). That will, according to the money-grubbing raiders, “unlock shareholder value” (i.e. make them rich). Below we have EQT’s announcement, which came a day before Shaw sent the company a letter and a presentation (also below) that supposedly outlines how splitting EQT in two is best for everyone. At least Shaw is not demanding EQT pull out of the Rice Energy deal, as Jana is doing…
    Read More “Under Pressure, EQT Moves Up Timeline to Explore Splitting Co.”

  • | | | | | |

    Lawyers ask US Supreme Court to Hear WV EQT Royalty Case

    WV Supreme Court Justice Beth Walker

    In a decision that thrilled drillers, but angered landowners, the West Virginia Supreme Court decided in May to overturn its own previous decision (from last December) and allow driller EQT to deduct post-production expenses from royalty payments (see WV Supreme Court Reverses Itself, Post-Production Deductions OK). Last December MDN reported on the huge WV Supreme Court decision against driller EQT that disallows EQT from deducting post-production expenses from royalty checks, even with signed contracts in place (see WV Supreme Court Rules EQT Can’t Deduct P-P Costs from Royalties). The justices, in their ruling, said that drillers can “not deduct from that (royalty) amount any expenses that have been incurred in gathering, transporting or treating the oil or gas after it has been initially extracted, any sums attributable to a loss or beneficial use of volume beyond that initially measured or any other costs that may be characterized as post-production.” A really big deal. Then in February, with a brand new justice on the bench, the WV Supreme Court agreed to rehear the case after an appeal filed by EQT–a rare and unusual step (see EQT Catches Big Break in WV Supreme Court re Royalty Deductions). Those who won the case say newly elected Supreme Court Justice Elizabeth Walker had conflicts of interest and should not have been allowed to vote to rehear the case in the first place (which she did). On that basis, they tried to avoid the rehearing altogether, but that failed. As it turns out, the lawyers mainly argued over the meaning of three short words: “at the wellhead” (see WV Supreme Court Post-Production Royalty Case Hinges on 3 Words). In the May decision, the justices reversed their earlier decision, voting 4-1 in favor of allowing EQT to deduct “reasonable” post-production expenses. Newly elected Justice Beth Walker, with (according to the other side) conflicts of interest, voted in favor of EQT. On the basis that Walker should not have been part of the process at all, lawyers for the losing landowners have appealed the case all the way to the United States Supreme Court…
    Read More “Lawyers ask US Supreme Court to Hear WV EQT Royalty Case”

  • | | | | | | |

    WV Surface Owners Win Important Case Against EQT re Drill Pad

    A West Virginia Circuit Court case decided last week (by jury) found in favor of surface owners against a well pad constructed by EQT. The decision has far-reaching implications for not only surface owners and drillers, but mineral rights owners too. From the first time we read about so-called “joint development” legislation being promoted by the drilling industry in WV (back in February), we’ve not been fans (see More on WV’s Push for “Joint Development” Instead of Forced Pooling). In brief, there are a number of existing old leases in WV, signed before shale drilling began, that prevents drillers from drilling a horizontal well across an individual property boundary line–until a new lease is signed. Joint development says if the driller already owns the leases on all adjoining properties they want to combine into a drilling unit, they can do so without signing a new lease. The proposed joint development law seemed to us to be a way for drillers to avoid negotiating and paying more for new leases–which they should be willing to do! However, the case of Crowder and Wentz v EQT puts joint development in a new light for us. The case appears (to us) to be an abuse of power by surface owners against both drillers and mineral rights owners–by using the current prohibition against joint development. We certainly understand why surface rights owners would resist having a drill pad on their property, however, that’s life. They bought land (or inherited it, etc.) that doesn’t have mineral rights attached. Under existing WV law, a well pad can be drilled, taking 10-15 acres of the surface land (against the surface landowner’s wishes, but with compensation), in order to access the minerals under that specific piece of property. However, the court ruled last week in Crowder and Wentz v EQT that a driller cannot then use that same already-constructed well pad to further drill wells that access minerals under other, adjacent properties. Which in our book makes a strong case for a joint development law, to avoid this kind of misuse by surface landowners…
    Read More “WV Surface Owners Win Important Case Against EQT re Drill Pad”

  • | | | | | | | | |

    M-U’s Biggest Drillers Increase NGL Production for Extra Money

    When a driller sinks a hole in the ground looking for one hydrocarbon–like natural gas–other hydrocarbons also come out of the ground. Sometimes its oil. Sometimes condensate. Sometimes natural gas liquids (NGLs), including ethane, propane, butane, pentane, etc. In northeast and central Pennsylvania where the Marcellus Shale is prolific, most of what comes out of the ground is just methane–or natural gas. However, in the southwestern portion of PA, and in the northern panhandle of WV and on into eastern OH, it’s a different story. They are considered “wet gas” areas because (depending on the county) the wells are prolific NGL producers. Most NGLs, like propane, fetch much higher prices than plain old methane. Typically ethane is the NGL that mostly comes out of the ground, but for many drillers ethane can’t (yet) be sold, so it’s considered a “waste” product, mixed into the methane stream to get rid of it. But that’s changing. There are now pipelines to carry ethane to facilities in both Philadelphia and to a cracker plant in Canada. There’s even a pipeline for ethane (and other NGLs) that goes all the way to the Gulf Coast (ATEX, Appalachia to Texas). Some of the largest Marcellus/Utica drillers now have markets for their NGLs, so they are ramping up production and selling more NGLs. In fact, six of the eight largest M-U drillers increased their NGL production in the second quarter of 2017 compared to 2Q16. Which six increased, and which two decreased NGL production last quarter?…
    Read More “M-U’s Biggest Drillers Increase NGL Production for Extra Money”

  • | | | | | |

    Fayette County, WV Loses Appeal to Block Injection Well

    An effort by Fayette County, WV to ban injection wells in the county has gone down to a final defeat. In January 2016, three liberal Democrat county commissioners from Fayette County, with the backing and help of the radical WV Mountain Party, voted to ban injection wells in the county (see WV County Officially Bans Injection Wells; Children Brainwashed). The ban was intentionally written so broadly it would also ban the operation of more than 500 vertical oil and gas wells in the county. The next day EQT sued to overturn the ban (see EQT Sues WV County that Banned Injection Wells, Seeks Injunction). One of the chief architects of the ban, from the Mountain Party, admits the ban was intended to stop all oil and gas activity in the county (see Anti Admits Fayette County, WV Ban Aims to Shut Down All O&G Wells). Fearing they would lose the EQT lawsuit, in March 2016 the Fayette commissioners backed away from the position of banning everything to do with drilling in the county. They revised the proposed ban regulation as a tactic to avoid losing their court case (see Fayette WV Commissioners Change Ban to Focus on Injection Wells). It didn’t work. In June 2016, a federal judge tossed out Fayette’s illegal ban (see Federal Judge Rules Fayette County Injection Well Ban Illegal). But that didn’t stop the lib Dems who, with the assistance of the radical Appalachian Mountain Advocates, appeal the federal judge’s decision (see Fayette County, WV Appeals Federal Court Ruling on Injection Well). That appealed case went to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has just ruled that Fayette County was out of line (copy of the decision below). Counties can’t make up their own oil and gas regulations–that right is reserved to the state…
    Read More “Fayette County, WV Loses Appeal to Block Injection Well”

  • | | | |

    Perverse Corporate Raider Calls EQT Plan to Buy Rice “Perverse”

    Barry Rosenstein – JANA Partners

    Corporate raiders buy just enough shares of stock in a company so they can put one or two members on the board of directors and control the company. Once a raider gains control, he fires a bunch of people, sells a bunch of assets, declares the company “healthier” and the stock price goes up. Once the stock price jumps, the raider then sells his shares at a profit and moves on to the next victim. That’s how disgusting, PERVERSE corporate raiders work. So imagine our outrage at reading comments by corporate raider Barry Rosenstein, of JANA Partners, who is trying to stop the merger/buyout of Rice Energy by EQT. Rosenstein calls the deal “perverse,” nothing more than a way for corporate executives to boost their own salaries. Kind of like the pot calling the kettle black, don’t you think?…
    Read More “Perverse Corporate Raider Calls EQT Plan to Buy Rice “Perverse””

  • | | | | |

    WV Shale Well Initial Production Rates Jump 20% in One Year

    Of the three Marcellus/Utica producing states–Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia–only WV reports well production on an annual basis. Not frequent enough! In July WV published production numbers for 2016. The exciting news is that on average, initial production (IP) of Marcellus/Utica shale wells surged 20% over 2015. IP is the amount of gas (or oil or NGLs) flowing from a well. However, when you dig into the numbers, you learn that IP rates did not go up universally across the state. Some counties had big increases, other counties went the other way. The same with drillers. Some drillers (like Antero) saw a big bump up in average IP rates. Other’s (like Southwestern Energy) saw a dip in IP rates from 2015 to 2016…
    Read More “WV Shale Well Initial Production Rates Jump 20% in One Year”

  • | | | | |

    Rice Energy Paid $180M for LOLA Energy; CEO Didn’t Want to Sell

    In July MDN brought you the news that Rice Energy had bought out the assets of LOLA Energy (see LOLA Energy Sells Out to Rice Energy, Deal Kept Hush-Hush). NGI’s ace reporter Jamison Cocklin was the first to break the news. Since that time, neither Rice nor the company buying Rice, EQT, have talked about it. In fact, they have refused to comment on it. Last week other news sources observed that Rice Energy’s quarterly update contains information about purchasing LOLA Energy (although even the quarterly update doesn’t use the name LOLA). The interesting thing is that the quarterly update pegs the amount. Rice Energy paid $180 million for the assets of LOLA Energy. LOLA was birthed near the end of 2015, by former EQT executives using $250 million of private equity money from Denham Capital (see New Marcellus/Utica Drilling Company is Born – LOLA Energy). Hmmm. Investors put up $250 million, but two years later the company sells for $180 million. We don’t pretend to be high finance experts, but it sure looks to us like a negative ROI on the transaction. Yet we read claims that “everybody who put in money made money.” How does that work?…

    Update: see a note in the comments. It appears that although $250M was promised by investors, not all of it is paid up front. Thx to MDN reader Venture Energy for enlightening us!
    Read More “Rice Energy Paid $180M for LOLA Energy; CEO Didn’t Want to Sell”

  • | | | | |

    Rice Energy Investor Sues in Fed Court to Block Sale to EQT

    In June EQT and Rice Energy announced that EQT will buy out and merge in Rice Energy, to create (in EQT) the largest natural gas-producing company in the United States (see EQT Buys Rice Energy in $8.2B Deal, Becomes #1 Gas Producer in US). You may see headlines from time to time that say EQT is paying $6.7 billion for Rice. However, EQT is also assuming $1.5 billion worth of Rice Energy debt as part of the deal–so in our book, the total price paid is $8.2 billion, not $6.7 billion. A few weeks after the announced merger, so-called “activist investor” (i.e. corporate raider) Jana Partners, in league with the Cohen family (Atlas Energy) started a proxy fight to block EQT’s takover/merger with Rice Energy (see Proxy Fight: Jana Partners, Atlas Tries to Stop EQT/Rice Deal). Instead of buying Rice, Jana is demanding that EQT split itself into two companies–upstream (drilling) and midstream (pipelines). Experts don’t give Jana much of a chance. However, we now have opposition on the other side of the isle–from a disgruntled investor in Rice Energy. On Wednesday, Rice Energy investor Patrick Gordon filed a lawsuit in Delaware federal court alleging that Rice, as part of the agreed merger, submitted incomplete paperwork (called an S-4) that “failed to include necessary financial information that would allow shareholders to make an informed decision when voting on the proposed sale to EQT.” Gordon says Rice’s sale price isn’t high enough. Gordon wants the court to stop a shareholder vote on the deal until an amended S-4 is filed, giving what Gordon says is the full financial picture…
    Read More “Rice Energy Investor Sues in Fed Court to Block Sale to EQT”

  • | | | |

    Anatomy of a Merger – The Years’ Long Road to EQT/Rice Deal

    In June EQT and Rice Energy announced that EQT will buy out and merge in Rice Energy, to create (in EQT) the largest natural gas-producing company in the United States (see EQT Buys Rice Energy in $8.2B Deal, Becomes #1 Gas Producer in US). You may see headlines from time to time that say EQT is paying $6.7 billion for Rice. However, EQT is also assuming $1.5 billion worth of Rice Energy debt as part of the deal–so in our book, the total price paid is $8.2 billion, not $6.7 billion. Have you ever wondered how a massive deal like this comes together? Did the top brass at EQT phone up the top brass at Rice and say “let’s go for coffee” and a few months later there’s a deal? Nope. Doesn’t happen that way. In paperwork filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, EQT (and Rice) outlined the chronology of how this deal came together. It’s far more complicated than the most complicated soap opera you can imagine. The story begins with EQT keeping a close eye on available acreage in the southwestern Marcellus region. EQT noticed an “accelerating trend” of consolidation. In 2015, a full two years before the EQT/Rice announcement, EQT lusted for more acreage and feared that if Rice combined with someone else, an important opportunity would be lost. So EQT got outside help (Wachtell Lipton) to begin the process of evaluating a buyout of Rice (June 2015). In July 2015, the muckety mucks from both Rice and EQT got together to talk, and “informally” discussed the potential benefits of a merger. But the talks went nowhere at the time. In early 2016, two other companies (unnamed) held similar talks with Rice. EQT then jumped back into the mix, in May 2016. EQT and Rice promptly got more serious about sniffing around each other, signing confidentiality agreements and beginning the due diligence process. Things moved quickly. Rice investigated mergers with two other companies and with EQT. EQT pressed Rice for an answer in July 2016. Talks broke down by the end of the summer in 2016. Rice then bought out Vantage and EQT snapped up more Marcellus acreage in various deals. And the soap opera goes on from there. We have the full script below…
    Read More “Anatomy of a Merger – The Years’ Long Road to EQT/Rice Deal”

  • |

    EQT 2Q17: Ends Utica Drilling for Now, Merger with Rice on Track

    My how times change. Just last October EQT indicated that in the not-too-distant future the company would be primarily a Utica Shale driller (see EQT 3Q16: Company will Soon be Primarily a Utica Driller). The company had experimented with Utica wells in Greene County, PA and Wetzel County, WV–with good results. Earlier this month a couple of EQT reps giving a talk to the Monongahela Area Chamber of Commerce said EQT would drill seven Utica wells in the Mon Valley–THIS YEAR (see EQT Update on Mon Valley Drilling – 7 Utica Wells Coming This Yr). Yesterday EQT held a conference call and issued their second quarter financial and operational results. Buried in the update was this statement: “In anticipation of the merger with Rice Energy, EQT has suspended its Utica test program as improved returns on Marcellus wells resulting from longer laterals made possible by the Rice acquisition are higher than the return expected on the average Utica well today.” No more Utica drilling–at least for now. My how times change. Also of keen interest, on the conference call, EQT CEO Steve Schlotterbeck said the board is working on a comprehensive review of the company, post-merger with Rice, and one of the options will be “splitting the companies” (upstream/drilling and midstream/pipelines), as corporate raider Jana Partners has been pressuring them to do…
    Read More “EQT 2Q17: Ends Utica Drilling for Now, Merger with Rice on Track”

  • | | | | | | | | | | |

    LOLA Energy Sells Out to Rice Energy, Deal Kept Hush-Hush

    NGI’s Shale Daily has done it again. Ace reporter Jamison Cocklin has unearthed news that (so far) no one else has: Rice Energy has quietly, confidentially, hush-hush purchased all of the assets of LOLA Energy. The sale raises a lot of questions. But first, who is LOLA? No, not the show girl in Barry Manilow’s 1978 hit song Copacabana. LOLA Energy was birthed near the end of 2015, by former EQT executives using $250 million of private equity money from Denham Capital (see New Marcellus/Utica Drilling Company is Born – LOLA Energy). The name LOLA comes from the phrase Locally Owned, Locally Accountable. LOLA didn’t waste any time. They leased land in Greene County, PA–a prime location highly prized by both Rice Energy and EQT–and also in West Virginia, land in Monongalia, Wetzel and Marion counties. Shale Daily reports that rumors have been swirling for weeks, but NGI now has the goods–copies of transfer records going from LOLA to Rice. For some reason, perhaps related to EQT’s impending purchase of Rice Energy, Rice and LOLA have kept the deal hush-hush. But the lid is off now! Here’s what we know about the deal, sprinkled with some MDN speculation…
    Read More “LOLA Energy Sells Out to Rice Energy, Deal Kept Hush-Hush”