Cuts Coming to Shell’s Marcellus Shale Operations
In a statement issued yesterday, and from comments made by Shell’s CEO Ben van Beurden on a “management day” analyst phone call, Shell has signaled they aren’t happy with the return they’re getting from their shale plays in the U.S., including the Marcellus. Specifically Shell has said they plan to decrease spending and investment, and trim operations, in dry gas (methane only) shale areas starting this year. Trim by how much? The statement they issued says 20%, but van Beurden is reported to have said 30% in his statements on the analyst call. In either case, look for Shell to sell some of the their 900,000 acres of Marcellus Shale leases and trim back on the 300 workers they currently have working in the Marcellus play.
It was just four years ago that Shell bought all of East Resources and their Marcellus operations (see East Resources Sells to Royal Dutch Shell for $4.7 Billion, Deal Includes All of East’s Marcellus Shale Operations). Apparently they now believe that was a bit of “irrational exuberance,” to borrow a phrase from Alan Greenspan. The odd thing for us is that much smaller companies, like Cabot Oil & Gas, make money hand over fist in dry gas-only areas of the Marcellus, but the big boys like Shell are hamstrung and don’t make money. Why is that? What gives the smaller players a leg up that simply can’t be matched by companies like Shell?…
Read More “Cuts Coming to Shell’s Marcellus Shale Operations”

Finally, signs of life from the
In June 2011 Shell announced to the world that they would build a “world-scale” ethane cracker plant in the northeast (see
At the end of October, MDN told you about comments from Shell’s retiring CEO Peter Voser that stoked fears that the previously announced Pennsylvania ethane cracker plant they may build was in doubt (see
It seems that darned West Virginia ethane cracker plant is just getting too much attention, so the AP has written a “Me too! Me too! Look at me! Pick me!” article about the proposed Shell ethane cracker plant planned for Beaver County, PA. AP has “investigated” (there’s a first!) and found certain evidence that may point to Shell actually going forward with their cracker plant. As MDN pointed out tongue-in-cheek just last week, the Greater Pittsburgh area has some angst that the WV cracker may spell the end of the Shell cracker in their state–so there’s a bit of trash talking going on (see
MDN recently brought you rumors (evidence?) that the prospects of Shell building a multi-billion dollar ethane cracker plant in western Pennsylvania were seriously dimming (see
On an analyst call yesterday, Shell’s outgoing CEO Peter Voser stoked fears that Shell may be ready to pull the plug on the announced ethane cracker plant planned for Monaca, PA. According to Voser, the company will make “hard choices” over the next few quarters about which projects it will fund and build. Specifically, Voser said the company had previously announced three big projects: the ethane cracker in PA, a gas-to-liquids plant in Louisiana, and an LNG plant in Canada. He said Shell cannot build all three projects. Gulp.
It seems like MDN has been writing about Shell’s proposed $2 billion ethane cracker plant for like, ever. You can