First Signs Appear that Cancer/Fracking in Kids Study in Trouble
Nearly two years ago, Gov. Tom Wolf announced a $2.5 million contract had been awarded to the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health to “conduct research on the potential health effects of hydraulic fracturing in Pennsylvania” (see Pitt Researchers Get $2.5M for Fake Study to Link Shale & Kid Cancer). As we pointed out from the beginning, to study a single potential cause for cancer (fracking) and not any other causes (like a nearby abandoned uranium dump), is not real science. We’ve been critical of Pitt researchers, but maybe they are attempting real science after all. Why? The typical tight coalition of Big Education and Big Green is beginning to break down. Pitt researchers will not participate in a meeting being organized by anti-fossil fuel zealots that supposedly would provide an update on the so-called fracking-causes-cancer study.
Read More “First Signs Appear that Cancer/Fracking in Kids Study in Trouble”
According to a column by a Reuters analyst, U.S. natural gas production will need to increase significantly to continue growing LNG exports while ensuring natgas remains affordable for domestic electric power producers, households, and industrial users. This is the first article (we’ve seen) that puts numbers to the claim that LNG exports are beginning to drive the price of domestic natgas to higher levels.
Princeton University’s endowment, the fourth largest in the U.S., is bowing to cancel culture and is going to divest any holdings it has in some (but not all) fossil energy companies, including Exxon Mobil and Suncor Energy. Princeton is in good company with other Ivy League dunces, including Cornell University (see 
In September, EQT Corporation announced it is buying Tug Hill Operating’s West Virginia shale assets for $5.2 billion (see 
There’s ESG, and then there’s ESG. We’ve tried to make this distinction a number of times, and will use the latest ESG report issued by Antero Resources to make the distinction again. When a huge (very important) company like Antero Resources, a natural gas driller focused on West Virginia, talks about ESG (or Environmental, Social, and Governance), it’s talking about all of the things the company does to prove to wackos that it behaves in an environmentally responsible manner when extracting hydrocarbons out of the ground. When the wackos talk about ESG, they mean (a) get everyone to divest from fossil energy, and (b) if a company happens to be in the fossil energy business, it needs to move away from extracting oil and gas and toward investing in sketchy so-called renewable energy sources.
In August, Jennifer Granholm, hands down the most incompetent Secretary of Energy ever to hold the office, sent a letter to seven major refinery companies threatening them that if they don’t scale back exports of gasoline, diesel, and other liquid petroleum products, Granholm will have old dementia Joe whip up an executive order slapping a ban on such exports (see 
MARCELLUS/UTICA REGION: Schumer and Pelosi could have helped; NATIONAL: U.S. oil execs fear recession, nagging supply shortages; INTERNATIONAL: Oil posts first quarterly loss in two years as recession fears grow; Well done everyone, we’ve let China become the real energy superpower.