| | | |

Company Seeks to Lease New York Mineral & Pore Rights for Flat $10

A company called Southern Tier CO2 to Clean Energy Solutions, based in Binghamton, NY (where MDN is located), is sending fliers to landowners in Broome, Tioga, and Chemung counties (along the border with Pennsylvania, where there is no doubt large amounts of Marcellus and Utica gas beneath the ground) inviting landowners to sign up for what appears to be an exciting opportunity to sell gas rights. The flier (below) and company website say the company plans to use carbon dioxide (CO2) to (a) store it underground, but also (b) use it to extract natural gas from underground and then (c) either sell the gas via pipeline or burn it to produce electricity. The technology envisioned is an alternative to fracking. Will it work? And, will it be profitable for landowners?
Continue reading

| | | | | |

Leasing in Columbiana County Picks Up; Bonuses & Royalties Down

Once upon a time (roughly 12 years ago), Chesapeake Energy and other shale drillers were leasing property in Columbiana County, OH, in deals that often paid $6,000 per acre for a signing bonus and granted 20% royalties for any oil or gas produced. According to an analysis by the Youngstown Business Journal, those days are long gone. However, many of those original leases have expired, and there is a new push to re-lease in the county, says a Youngstown attorney specializing in oil and gas. Just don’t expect big signing bonuses and royalty rates.
Continue reading

| | | | | |

OH Fed Court Ruling Further Clarifies Post-Production Deductions

An important decision was recently issued in a federal court case (in Ohio) that has the potential to affect landowners and drillers with shale leases throughout the Marcellus/Utica. At least, we believe it has broader implications. The case is known as Grissoms et al. v. Antero Resources Corporation. The case revolves around the issue of a “market enhancement” royalty clause (MEC), which is common in many shale leases throughout the M-U. An MEC lease typically prohibits the deduction of any post-production costs incurred in transforming raw gas into a marketable product. The question is, when is the gas marketable? At the wellhead or later on, after it has been cleaned up? The judge in the Grissoms case ruled in favor of the landowner and said the gas is NOT “marketable” in its raw form at the wellhead.
Continue reading

| | | | | | | |

PA Game Comm. Does 2 Deals with PGE to Allow Drilling, 16% Royalty

Last week, the Pennsylvania Board of Game Commissioners announced it had cut two different deals with Pennsylvania General Energy (PGE). Both deals involve land swaps with the prospect of new shale drilling by PGE on the way in both Lycoming County and Sullivan County. The Game Commission’s remit is “to protect, propagate, manage and preserve the game or wildlife of Pennsylvania.” Money from shale drilling helps the Game Commission accomplish its objectives. Both deals with PGE will provide the Game Commission with a 16% royalty for any natural gas produced.
Continue reading

| | | |

Ohio Comm. Says 12.5% Royalties for State Land Drilling Too Cheap

Singer concludes her song during break of Ohio Oil & Gas Land Management Commission. (WSYX/Darrel Rowland)

In January, Ohio House Bill (HB) 507 became law with the signature of Gov. Mike DeWine (see OH Gov. Signs Bill Expanding Drilling in State Parks, NatGas “Green”). The new law allows shale drilling under (but not on top of) Ohio state-owned land, including state parks. HB 507 encourages (pushes for) more drilling under state-owned land. The special commission created to award contracts — called the Ohio Oil & Gas Land Management (OGLM) Commission — met yesterday to consider the 12+ “nominations” (requests to drill) received so far. The meeting was beset with silly anti-fossil fuelers (most of them old hippies) behaving like the silly horse’s rear-ends they are. Dressed up, parading around, and singing (ever notice how lefties like to play dress-up?). Aside from the distraction of antis, the topic of discussion that caught our attention was the royalty rate supposedly established by the state legislature that must be used in all contracts. OGML members say the established rate they must use is WAY too low and somehow needs to be changed.
Continue reading

| | | | | |

Judge Rules WV Lawsuit Against SWN for ‘Well Bashing’ Continues

Two Marshall County, WV landowners with the same last name (obviously related) sued Southwestern Energy (SWN), accusing the company of “well bashing,” in March of this year (see WV Mineral Owners’ Lawsuit Accuses Southwestern of ‘Well Bashing’). The landowners seek to have the lawsuit certified as a class action. Well bashing happens when drilling a child well near a parent well causes the parent well to lose pressure or become clogged with fracking fluids and sand. Ultimately, the child well causes the parent well to become less profitable (i.e., less revenue from royalties for the landowner). The WV lawsuit says Southwestern is practicing well bashing intentionally–in order to keep lease rates low. Yesterday, a federal judge working the case rejected Southwestern’s request to dismiss the case.
Continue reading

| | | |

WV Hydrogen Project to Generate Rev. of $105M/Yr, Incl. Pore Rights

Yesterday we told you about a new $2 billion hydrogen project coming to West Virginia (see $2B Hydrogen Project Announces for WV – FidelisH2 in Mason Co.). Fidelis New Energy announced it had selected Mason County for a “net-zero” hydrogen production facility and low carbon microgrid, which it has dubbed The Mountaineer GigaSystem. The Fidelis plan includes building data centers powered by net-zero hydrogen. Fidelis will produce hydrogen with “zero lifecycle carbon emissions” from a combination of Marcellus/Utica gas, renewable energy, and CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration). Today we pull back the curtain on how the deal came together and the state’s upcoming use of “pore rights.”
Continue reading

| |

PHX Minerals Says WhiteHawk Marriage Proposal “Grossly Inadequate”

Last week MDN told you that WhiteHawk Energy, headquartered in Philadelphia with ownership of mineral and royalty interests for 850,000 gross unit acres and over 2,500 producing horizontal shale wells between the Marcellus and the Haynesville, had proposed marriage to PHX Minerals, based in Fort Worth, Texas, owner of 75,000 leased mineral acres principally located in the SCOOP and Haynesville plays (see WhiteHawk Energy Proposes Forced Merger with PHX Minerals, Inc.). WhiteHawk’s original overtures went unanswered, so it issued a very public proclamation of its intent to get PHX down the aisle, willingly or not. PHX answered yesterday–with a very public “get lost” message.
Continue reading

| |

WhiteHawk Energy Proposes Forced Merger with PHX Minerals, Inc.

At the end of May, WhiteHawk Energy, headquartered in Philadelphia with ownership of mineral and royalty interests for 850,000 gross unit acres and over 2,500 producing horizontal shale wells between the Marcellus and the Haynesville, sent a letter to the board and management of PHX Minerals, based in Fort Worth, Texas, owner of 75,000 leased mineral acres principally located in the SCOOP and Haynesville plays. The letter proposes marriage–a combination of the two companies. WhiteHawk received no response and tried again about three weeks later. Still nothing. So WhiteHawk has gone public to catch the attention of PHX shareholders, hoping to convince them to pressure PHX’s board–the M&A equivalent of a shotgun wedding.
Continue reading

WhiteHawk Energy Gets $100M to Buy More Mineral/Royalty Rights

Headquartered in Philadelphia, PA, WhiteHawk Energy was founded in 2021 to acquire mineral rights and royalty interests in U.S. shale plays. The management team of WhiteHawk has deep roots in the Marcellus, having founded Atlas Energy (a Marcellus driller) that was later sold to Chevron for $4.3 billion. In March 2022, MDN told you that WhiteHawk had purchased mineral and royalty rights in southwestern Pennsylvania, primarily in Washington and Green counties, for $52.5 million, covering 475,000 gross acres (see WhiteHawk Energy Buys NatGas & Royalty Assets in SWPA for $52M). WhiteHawk announced yesterday it had arranged a new $100 million line of credit (i.e., “credit facility”) with an unnamed lender to buy more mineral rights and royalty interests.
Continue reading

Mineral Rights, Royalty Rights, and Working Interests – a Tutorial

We spotted an in-depth article by RBN Energy about mineral rights, royalties, and working interests. Private investors and companies have sprung up to buy such rights. RBN says competition to buy these rights has heated up in recent years. The article gives us a better understanding of the scope, size, and inner workings of the royalty and rights marketplace.
Continue reading

| | | |

Thorny Issue of Who Owns O&G Rights Under PA Roads – Strip & Gore

For years we’ve railed against what we consider the theft of royalties and bonus payments by the state of Pennsylvania from landowners with creeks and rivers running through their leased (for shale drilling) property. The Pennsylvania Dept. of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) claims that under a centuries-old law, the state of PA “owns” the property under “navigable” waterways–including rivers and streams (see PA DCNR Seizes $45M in Streambed Royalties & Bonuses Since 2015). Now comes another similar issue–the ownership of mineral rights under PA roadways.
Continue reading

| | | | | |

Fed Court Nixes Chesapeake Royalty Settlement with PA Landowners

In 2021, U.S. District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief Judge for the Southern District of Texas, approved deals for Chesapeake Energy to pay $6.25 million to class members of the three royalty lawsuits brought by Pennsylvania landowners (roughly 15,000 class members) and another $2.9 million to the lawyers involved (see Texas Judge OKs Chesapeake Royalty Lawsuit Deal w/PA Landowners). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has just ruled the Texas court did not have the authority to approve the settlement, nullifying the settlement.
Continue reading

| | | |

PA DCNR Sec. Dunn’s Anti-Gas Bias Evident for All to See

DCNR Sec. Cindy Adams Dunn

Cindy Adams Dunn has been, and continues to be, a major disappointment as Secretary of the Dept. of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR). She has held that position through all of Tom Wolf’s pathetic administration, and Josh Shapiro, in an explicable fit of poor judgment, has kept her on in his administration. Responding to a statement made by Republican State Sen. Gene Yaw, Dunn trotted out the classic false dichotomy argument, saying the outdoor recreation economy draws in more revenue for the state than oil and gas drilling.
Continue reading

| | | |

Encino Offered OH $1.8B Deal to Drill Under Salt Fork State Park

Yeah, you read the headline correctly. Encino Energy offered the State of Ohio $1.8 BILLION (estimated) to drill for natural gas and oil under Salt Fork State Park, located in Guernsey County, OH. The park includes 17,229 acres of land and 2,952 acres of water. In December, Encino made an offer to the state immediately after House Bill (HB) 507 passed. The offer includes a payment of $5,500 per acre as a signing bonus and 20% royalties. No drilling would be done inside the park. All drilling would be done on land surrounding (on the outside of) the park.
Continue reading

| |

PA Generates Record $370M from Game Land Leases & Drilling

The Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) owns and manages more than 1.5 million acres of state game lands throughout the Commonwealth. The primary purpose of these lands is the management of habitat for wildlife and providing opportunities for lawful hunting and trapping. You might think PGC gets most of its revenue from hunting and trapping licenses and fees. You would be wrong. PGC allows shale drilling on some of its vast holdings, and leases and royalties generate about 7X the income for PGC than all other sources combined.
Continue reading