Under Pressure, EQT Moves Up Timeline to Explore Splitting Co.
A second corporate raider is now making trouble for EQT and its planned purchase of/merger with with Rice Energy. In June, EQT and Rice Energy announced that EQT will buy out and merge in Rice Energy, to create (in EQT) the largest natural gas-producing company in the United States (see EQT Buys Rice Energy in $8.2B Deal, Becomes #1 Gas Producer in US). A few weeks after the announced merger, so-called “activist investor” (i.e. corporate raider) Jana Partners, in league with the Cohen family (Atlas Energy) started a proxy fight to block EQT’s takover/merger with Rice Energy (see Proxy Fight: Jana Partners, Atlas Tries to Stop EQT/Rice Deal). Instead of buying Rice, Jana is demanding that EQT split itself into two companies–upstream (drilling) and midstream (pipelines). Jana is now joined by a second group, a group that holds 4% of EQT’s outstanding stock–D.E. Shaw Group. Shaw is headed up by former Elliott Management head and corporate raider Quentin Koffey. As a reminder, raiders buy enough stock to get themselves a seat or two on the board of directors, so they can force a company to sell assets and fire people to drive up the price of the stock, lining their pockets because the raiders then sell the stock after the price goes up, moving on to the next target. Disgusting. And now Shaw, perhaps in league with Jana, is ganging up on EQT. So it’s no surprise that EQT has had to respond by issuing a statement that they’ve “accelerated” the timeline to explore the issue both Jana and Shaw are demanding–that the company split itself in two–upstream (drilling) and midstream (pipelines). That will, according to the money-grubbing raiders, “unlock shareholder value” (i.e. make them rich). Below we have EQT’s announcement, which came a day before Shaw sent the company a letter and a presentation (also below) that supposedly outlines how splitting EQT in two is best for everyone. At least Shaw is not demanding EQT pull out of the Rice Energy deal, as Jana is doing…
Read More “Under Pressure, EQT Moves Up Timeline to Explore Splitting Co.”

According to expert analysis by the legal beagles at the Blank Rome law firm, a recent decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania disregards established precedent law and has created a new law in PA, possibly “leaving lessees [drillers] in limbo, possibly giving unscrupulous lessors [landowners] a unilateral tool to terminate oil and gas leases, and ultimately harming both lessors and lessees in the process.” In Montgomery v. R. Oil & Gas Enterprises, two (out of three) judges ruled that oil and gas leases could be severed (terminated) both “vertically” and “horizontally” by unilateral actions of the landowner. In this case “vertical” means shale or other rock layers under the ground, and “horizontal” means surface ownership. As with most things legal, this is a complicated case with a lot of history we won’t attempt to recount it chapter and verse. If we can boil it all down, the judges found that a landowner who had purchased a piece of property with an old lease that contained terms for shallow rock layers and deeper rock layers, could, unilaterally, terminate one aspect of that lease (in this case the shallow layer portion of the lease) while keeping the other aspect of the lease intact (the deeper layers, already drilled and producing). The Blank Rome analysis below does a deep dive into the case, frankly ripping the decision to shreds, and postulates the theory that it may lead to cases in which a landowner with a decades-old lease in which the shallow layers are held by production can separate and convey the deeper layers to a family member or family trust, and then terminate the deeper layer lease, re-releasing it to a different driller…
In July when the Pennsylvania Senate passed their awful budget bill that includes a variety of new taxes, including a new severance tax on the Marcellus industry, they also slipped in Section 1610 which changes established lease law with respect to oil and gas wells that no longer produce anything (see
Last week the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) issued the final permit needed by Williams to begin construction on Atlantic Sunrise, a $3 billion, 198-mile pipeline project running through 10 Pennsylvania counties to connect Marcellus Shale natural gas from northeastern PA with the Williams’ Transco pipeline in southern Lancaster County (see 
It is a story we see happening more and more frequently–local distribution companies (LDCs, your local gas & electric company) are adding new customers in places previously not served by natural gas lines–because of the presence of the abundant, cheap, and clean-burning Marcellus Shale. The latest such story we noticed of this type comes from the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre area. If you ever whiz through Scranton, and then Wilkes-Barre, motoring down Interstate 81 (as we’ve done hundreds of times over the years), one of the townships you pass through without knowing it is Dupont (in Luzerne County)–quite close to the regional airport in Avoca, not far from Montage Mountain ski resort, and a whisker away from Moosic. Utility giant UGI has begun a program to install natural gas pipelines to 123 homes in Dupont, to provide Marcellus Shale gas to those homes…
Earlier this year a poll of Virginians found 62% of them support building the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) project in the state (see
West Virginia Dept. of Environmental Protection’s (WVDEP) capricious decision to yank a permit it previously granted for the Mountain Valley Pipeline is “the last straw” according to the legal beagles at the Blank Rome law firm. Last week WVDEP, under pressure in a lawsuit brought by the radical Sierra Club, decided to revoke a previously granted water crossing permit (see
Ever notice how liberal mainstream news organizations, like CNBC, call someone “renowned” when they echo the media narrative of the day? Such is the case with an investor, Jim Chanos, who is betting against the shale industry by short selling–taking stock positions that bet stock prices for shale companies will go DOWN. So this big-time investor bets against shale, then gives a talk at a big-time financial industry conference in New York to trash talk the shale industry, hoping he can create a run (down) against the stocks he’s bet against. Anyone else see a huge conflict of interest here? And then lib-central CNBC comes along to give this guy a megaphone to spew his trash talk of the shale industry. Welcome to Wonderland, Alice. A day after CNBC ran their segment on Chanos trash talking shale, Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental Resources (great guy) showed up on CNBC asking, “Who is this guy?” One of the stocks Chanos focused on trash talking was Hamm’s company. Hamm’s point was/is “renowed” investor Chanos is a nobody, at least nobody most folks have ever heard of. Hamm rips him a new one, revealing that Chanos made big bets the price of shale stocks (particular that of Continental) would go down, and when they didn’t, Chanos scrambled to try and talk them down…
The “best of the rest” – stories that caught MDN’s eye that you may be interested in reading. In today’s lineup: Rover Pipeline sends more Marcellus/Utica shale gas west; Maryland antis hold public meeting to trash talk short pipeline under Potomac River; LNG exports picking up post-Hurricane Harvey; Sabal Trail pipeline operated safely through Hurricane Irma; Texas frac sand in demand; House votes to block funding for Obama EPA methane rule; we’re hitting the “golden age” of natgas; Canadians strike back against U.S. shale; and more!