Noble Energy 1Q16: Still Active in the Marcellus, Compl. 25 Wells
Noble Energy, a driller with a significant presence in the Marcellus but with a bigger presence in other shale plays, (and operations in other countries and offshore), announced in February that of the four shale plays they operate in onshore in the U.S.–the DJ Basin, Eagle Ford, Delaware and Marcellus–in 2016 they plan to focus on the first three and scale back in the Marcellus, limiting their Marcellus activity to completing previously drilled wells (see Noble Energy Loses $2.4B in 2015; Marcellus Scale-Back in 2016). Last week Noble issued its first quarter 2016 update. We are, of course, most interested in their Marcellus activity. Noble reports, true to their word, that although they didn’t drill any new wells, they did complete 25 wells and production in the Marcellus spiked up 46% in 1Q16 over the same quarter in 2015…
Read More “Noble Energy 1Q16: Still Active in the Marcellus, Compl. 25 Wells”
Carrizo Oil & Gas, a Houston-based driller, actively drills in the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Delaware Basin in West Texas, the Niobrara Formation in Colorado, and until mid-year in 2015, they did have an active drilling program in the Ohio Utica and Pennsylvania Marcellus. No more. They haven’t drilled in Appalachia since 3Q15, and according to their 2015 year-in-review udpate, they won’t be drilling in the Marcellus/Utica in 2016 (see 
Gulfport Energy, a sizable driller in the Utica Shale, lost a lot of money last year (see 
Chesapeake Energy released its first quarter 2016 update yesterday. From the update we learn that the company lost $964 million in 1Q16–but most of it was a paper loss, their assets being written down in value given the low price of oil and gas. Chessy spent $365 million in 1Q16 vs. $1.5 billion in 1Q15. Perhaps most telling is that the company operated just 8 drilling rigs during 1Q16 vs. operating 54 during 1Q15. What about the Utica and Marcellus? During the earnings teleconference call, Chesapeake’s Executive Vice President for Exploration, Frank Patterson, and CEO Doug “the ax” Lawler had high praise for the Marcellus. Both calling it “a core asset” and “an incredibly powerful asset.” Currently the Marcellus produces about 1.8 billion cubic feet per day for Chesapeake. They are curtailing about 350 million cubic feet per day of Marcellus production. However, Chessy loves the Utica more–at least right now. While there are no plans to restart drilling in the Marcellus this year (as it stands right now), there are plans to drill more wells in the Utica. Why? Because the Utica has pipelines that can cart production to the Gulf Coast, via Spectra Energy’s OPEN (Ohio Pipeline Energy Network) pipeline. The Marcellus is currently pipeline challenged, which makes the recent announcements about both Kinder Morgan’s NED project and Williams’ Constitution Pipeline project all the more tragic. Chessy loves the Marcellus–but they’re waiting and watching until more pipeline capacity comes online. Here’s what was said vis-a-vis the Marcellus and Utica on yesterday’s analyst call…
The muckety-mucks from Shell held their quarterly earnings phone call with analysts yesterday–and there is what we consider big news to report coming from that call. In response to a question from an analyst, Shell’s Chief Financial Officer, Simon Henry, commented there are four major “chemicals” projects currently under consideration by Shell. He also said a decision on the PA cracker plant project planned in Beaver County will likely be the first decision to be made because of “the timing of certain commitments that are already in place.” He added these glowing words about the PA cracker: “It’s an excellent project…[that] provides quite some portfolio resilience relative to the rest of the opportunities.” He later said “It’s a very strong and robust project.” If the price of oil were higher than the current $40, pulling the trigger on the PA cracker would be “a very easy decision.” When you read his comments, it’s hard to miss the enthusiasm at the highest echelons inside Shell…
Rice Energy, one of the newest and brightest drillers in the Marcellus/Utica, released their first quarter 2016 update yesterday. The company reports production averaged 675 million cubic feet equivalent per day (Mmcfe/d) during 1Q16, a 53% increase over 1Q15 (and up 8% from 4Q15). On the financial side the company lost $21 million during 1Q16, versus making $152,000 in 1Q15. Pretty mild compared to most. During 1Q16 Rice drilled 11 new Marcellus wells and 8 new Utica wells. Good to see someone is still drilling! Here’s the update, along with a great PowerPoint slide deck…
Eclipse Resources released their first quarter 2016 update yesterday. Although Eclipse, a Marcellus/Utica pure play driller headquartered in State College, PA (but drilling mostly in Ohio), has curtailed or shut-in some of it’s production given low prices for gas, they still posted an impressive 26% increase in production in 1Q16 over 1Q15. While we’ve heard of Prince and his “Purple Rain,” we hadn’t heard of Eclipse’s “Purple Hayes”–which is a Utica well with an underground lateral reaching out 18,500 feet–3.5 miles! During 1Q16 Eclipse drilled their Purple Hayes well in under 18 days. Amazing! Even more amazing–the well was completed with 124 frac stages. It is believed to be the longest onshore later well ever drilled. Kudos to Eclipse! On the downside, the company lost $41 million in 1Q16…
Yesterday MDN brought you the news that EQT has cut a deal to buy all of Norwegian Statoil’s operated Marcellus assets in West Virginia for $407 million (see 
EXCO Resources, once a sizable player in the Marcellus–with 145,000 net acres in the Marcellus and having drilled and operating 124 horizontal Marcellus wells–has pretty much abandoned the Marcellus at this point (see 
EQT, a major Marcellus (and Utica) driller based in Pittsburgh, announced yesterday it has cut a deal to purchase all of Norwegian Statoil’s Marcellus assets in West Virginia. The deal will give EQT another 62,500 net acres and 50 million cubic feet per day (50 Mcf/d) of natgas production for $407 million. The acreage is located in Wetzel, Tyler and Harrison counties in WV. The deal includes 31 Marcellus wells and ~500 drilling locations. It bumps up EQT’s available drilling locations by a big 29% and shows the company’s continued commitment to the mighty Marcellus Shale. How will they finance it? EQT released another announcement yesterday that says they are floating 10.5 million shares of new stock, hoping to get $67 per share for a total of $700 million for this deal and for “other potential acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.” Statoil is retaining ownership of its shale assets in Ohio and (for now) it’s non-operated Marcellus assets–i.e. joint venture deals where Statoil owns a portion of the lease but doesn’t do the drilling…
Ultra Petroleum, based in Houston, TX, is an independent exploration and production (E&P) company mainly focused on drilling in the Green River Basin of Wyoming. Ultra also drills for oil in the Uinta Basin/Three Rivers area in Utah. In addition, Ultra maintains a position in the Pennsylvania Marcellus shale with leases on 184,000 gross (91,000 net) acres–no small amount. They aren’t currently drilling on their Marcellus acreage, but if prices change, they likely would. That is, if they make it through bankruptcy. On Friday Ultra filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Houston. The company listed $1.28 billion in assets and $3.92 billion in debt. One (we would say stupid) investor owns a whopping $1.46 billion in unsecured IOUs (i.e. notes) from Ultra. Good luck with getting that paid. Here’s the low down on Ultra’s bankruptcy filing…
Reuters has written a wide ranging article on Magnum Hunter Resources (MHR) and the results of bankruptcy. The article implies MHR is nearly out of bankruptcy now (although it looks to us like a hearing in June will likely be the grande finale). The deal that MHR cut with debtors was to turn their debt into equity–note and bond holders are now stockholders. So MHR CEO Gary Evans now has a new board of directors composed of the new owners of the company. The problem is, the investors who used to hold stock in the company before bankruptcy have essentially lost their ownership–with the value of their previously issued stock now worthless. At least that’s our understanding of how this works (we’re open to being corrected on this). The Reuters article does a close-up of Gary Evans and recounts how he assured investors that a major asset sale was in the works that would save the company–shortly before he had the company file for bankruptcy. Some investors are not very happy with Mr. Evans over what they consider a deceptive practice…
Cabot Oil & Gas issued their first quarter 2016 update last Friday. The company reports losing $51 million in 1Q16 (compared to making a $40 million profit in 1Q15) because the price for natural gas slide 40% last year. Production numbers continue to impress. While they operate just a single rig in the PA Marcellus (in Susquehanna County), Cabot’s production increased 10% from 4Q15 to a whopping 1.628 million cubic feet per day average. In addition to the official update, we also selected out portions of Friday’s analyst phone call with Cabot’s top management. Among the topics discussed: the Constitution Pipeline, Cabot’s love of the PA Marcellus, “keep it in the ground” anti-drilling nutjobs and more…
A circuit court judge recently ruled on a case in West Virginia with implications for unitization or pooling. No, NOT forced pooling–or forcing landowners who haven’t signed a lease into a drilling unit, forcing drilling under their land. That’s not what this case was about. This case was about landowners with an already-signed lease for vertical wells now being used to allow that land to be pooled with other land and a horizontal well allowed to be drilled under it. The landowners, who wanted a new lease for horizontal drilling (and more money, which is reasonable in our opinion) said because the lease was silent on the matter of pooling or unitizing, it should not be allowed. The judge disagreed and found in favor of the energy company, in this case American Energy…