Vantage Energy Postpones IPO Citing Unfavorable Market Conditions
Have shale-related initial public offerings (IPOs) lost some of their luster? Early this year Rice Energy, focused on the Marcellus and Utica Shale region, launched an IPO that brought in $924 million (see Rice Energy IPO Soars, Brings in $84M More Than Expected). Eclipse Resources, another driller focused on the northeast, launched an IPO in June and raised $818 million (see the Bloomberg story Eclipse Resources Falls in Debut After IPO Priced at Low End). In July Vantage Energy, a Colorado company with major operations in the Marcellus, announced they would launch an IPO seeking $400. Then in September the number was revised up–the company felt like $601 million would be the goal of their IPO (see Vantage Energy IPO Target Goes from $400M to $601M). On Wednesday, Vantage announced they’re postponing the IPO, citing “unfavorable equity market conditions”…
Read More “Vantage Energy Postpones IPO Citing Unfavorable Market Conditions”

What are the nightmares that keep drillers up at night? Is it the prospect of having to pay big fines, like the biggest fine paid to date in Pennsylvania, announced just last week (see
Range Resources has just had their knuckles rapped, hard, by the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) with respect to wastewater/recycled water impoundments (i.e. ponds) they operate in Washington County, PA. Range has been fined the most any company has been fined by the DEP in the modern shale era–$4.15 million. They will also be required to close five of the seven impoundments they’ve operated in the county (Range was closing them anyway), and make major upgrades to the two remaining impoundments. There’s no way to sugarcoat this–Range was taken to the proverbial woodshed by the DEP and got a lot more than a switch to the rear-end…
In March 2013, the Center for Sustainable Shale Development (CSSD) burst onto the scene. It had been a closely guarded secret, the creation of a few hand-picked people from both industry and the environmental movement working together to see if there is any common ground on which both sides can agree that shale development would be safe, sustainable AND affordable. They worked hard for over a year and finally hammered out a set of 15 standards that if a driller (or midstream company or contractor) would meet, it would get a stamp of approval from both the industry and environmental groups as being a good goobie–a safe driller. We were somewhat skeptical from the start (see