Baker Hughes Announces 7,000 Layoffs Due to Low Oil Price
Although Baker Hughes, one of the largest oilfield services companies in the United States, had “record high” revenue in 2014 ($24.6 billion for the year), the company announced yesterday that they will lay off 7,000 employees in the first three months of 2015. This comes on the heals of Sclumberger’s announcement that they will lay off 9,000 (see Schlumberger Firing 9,000 to Reduce Head Count, “Low Oil Prices”). Both companies have a major presence in the Marcellus/Utica and both blame low oil prices for the layoffs. Their customers (exploration and production companies) are scaling back and not drilling as much, and for what drilling they do they are now squeezing oilfield services companies like crazy to lower costs. It certainly makes sense, on paper, for these companies to take drastic actions like this. But that’s not much comfort for the 7,000 families who are losing the jobs. Baker Hughes employs 62,000 people. The 7,000 jobs cut represent 11% of their workforce. Baker Hughes CEO Martin Craighead called the coming layoffs the “crappy part” of his job and the thing he really “hates” about the drilling industry…
Read More “Baker Hughes Announces 7,000 Layoffs Due to Low Oil Price”
MDN editor Jim Willis attended the Platts Global Energy Outlook Forum yesterday in New York City. (New York at Christmas time is truly a sight to behold.) One of the more interesting things Jim learned was from a purely off-the-cuff remark made by John Hill, vice chairman and managing director of First Reserve, one of the world’s largest energy-focused private equity and infrastructure investment firms. John was talking about the downward pressure energy companies are making on oilfield services companies–like Schulmberger and Halliburton and Baker Hughes–forcing them to discount their prices. In the case of Halliburton, which is buying Baker Hughes (see 
That was fast. Last week MDN told you the scuttlebutt that the second largest oilfield services company in the U.S., Halliburton, was “in talks” to buy the third largest oilfield services company in the U.S., Baker Hughes (see 
The biggest news to hit the oil and gas industry in recent memory happened yesterday. The financial press lit up (and ran HUNDREDS of stories) about the leak/announcement/news that oilfield services company Halliburton is “in talks” to buy out rival Baker Hughes. The largest oilfield services company in the U.S. (and in the world) is Schlumberger, followed by Halliburton (again, in both the world and in the U.S.). Baker Hughes (BH) is the fifth largest oilfield services company in the world, but #3 in the U.S. Halliburton’s market capitalization this morning–price per share times outstanding number of shares–is $47.65 billion. Baker Hughes’ market cap is $26.59 billion, up $5 billion since yesterday afternoon when the news broke. Combined, the two companies would be worth $74.24 billion and employ (if there are no layoffs) 144,000 people. Schlumberger’s market cap, by comparison, is $127.62 billion with 126,000 employees. Both Halliburton and BH are heavily involved in providing all sorts of services (rigs, fracking, logistics, etc.) for exploration & production companies in both the Marcellus and Utica, as well as every other major shale play in the U.S. AND in every conventional play around the world…
Baker Hughes is the world’s fifth largest oilfield services company. Schlumberger and Halliburton are numbers one and two, respectively. Oilfield services companies provide drilling equipment and yes, even fracking equipment (and fracking fluids) that power the shale revolution. Baker Hughes, with a large presence in the Marcellus/Utica, has just donated (for the second year in a row) $100,000 to Susan G. Komen®, the world’s leading breast cancer organization, to help in the effort to find a cure for breast cancer. Anyone alive over the age of 30 almost certainly has a relative or friend who is or has been afflicted by this disease. Doing what we can to fight it is something we all can get behind. But because some wacko anti-drillers make wild claims that fracking fluids “cause cancer”–even though fracking fluids contain many of the same chemicals in the stuff under your kitchen sink–some lib groups (incredibly) oppose the donation and efforts by Baker Hughes, saying it is blood money and “pink washing” the fracking industry…