Hydraulic Fracturing

  • | | | | |

    Voting for the Lesser of the PA LibDem Loonies

    There’s at least a few prominent Democrats running in the primary for Lieutenant Governor that have departed from the Democrat Party’s lunatic demand to stop all Marcellus drilling in the state–precious few, but at least a few that don’t share that view. So if you’re a registered LibDem and you must (hold your nose and) swing the lever for a Dem, you might want to consider who should get your vote based on their loony rating.

    Hint: Don’t vote for Brenda Alton or Brad Koplinksi, both support an immediate ban on further shale drilling…
    Read More “Voting for the Lesser of the PA LibDem Loonies”

  • | | | | |

    Sandra Steingraber’s Big Gaffe at You Defend It Debate

    A few days ago we gave you our eyewitness account of a debate between John Holko, president of Lenape Resources and Sandra Steingraber, author, erstwhile biologist and Rachel Carson wannabe (see Fracking Debate at Binghamton U: Holko vs Steingraber). It was a good debate to illustrate the utter lack of credibility and facts used by anti-drillers like Steingraber. In writing up our review, we overlooked perhaps the most outrageous and silly thing Steingraber said Monday night. She was pressing home the point she believes it’s time, right now, for New York to flip the switch and end the use of all fossil fuels (yes, she’s that “out there”). Debate moderator Rob Kilmer was somewhat incredulous and asked her if/how we might accomplish such a feat. She responded there is historical precedence–that at one time in our country’s (evil, vile) history, we could not conceive of a national economy without slave labor–and in the same way we overcame that morally abhorrent practice, we can overcome using fossil fuels today–apparently something equally abhorrent for Steingraber. You read that right–she equated burning fossil fuels for energy (something every single person reading this does, including Steingraber) with the enslavement of Africans in our distant past. How twisted is that?

    Our good friend Tom Shepstone from the must-read Natural Gas Now website brings us his view of the debate and recounts Steingraber’s “gilding of the lily” with her slavery comment…
    Read More “Sandra Steingraber’s Big Gaffe at You Defend It Debate”

  • | | | | | |

    NY Attorney General Actively Works Against 70K NY Landowners

    chained dogAs hard as it is to believe, New York’s Attorney General continues to work against his own constituents. We’ve known since his election that Democrat Eric Schneiderman is anti-drilling–what we didn’t know was was how much of an activist he would be, using his office to further his own distorted views on oil and gas drilling. He’s misused the power of the subpoena to go after drillers (see NY Attorney General Schneiderman Subpoenas Shale Drillers). He’s abused the power of his office to investigate town board members in towns that voted to “wait and see” (i.e. not ban) shale drilling (see NY Attorney General Investigates Towns Who Won’t Ban Fracking).

    Now, unbelievably, he has asked the court (and succeeded) in delaying a lawsuit brought by 70,000 New York residents–the people he’s sworn to protect–against Gov. Andrew Cuomo. It seems that Cuomo is the only person in the state Schneiderman wants to protect. He’s Andy’s personal junk yard guard dog–on a not-so-short leash. The Joint Landowners Coalition of New York (JLCNY) recently sued Cuomo with an Article 78 lawsuit, in essence asking the court to force Cuomo to do the job he won’t do and release new oil and gas drilling regulations (see D-Day: JLCNY Files Lawsuit Today Against Cuomo, Martens, Shah). Schneiderman has gotten the court to delay any action on the lawsuit from March 7 to April 4, to give Schneiderman and his lieutenants, what, more time after 5 1/2 years?…
    Read More “NY Attorney General Actively Works Against 70K NY Landowners”

  • | | | | | |

    Happy Story Ends Badly Because of 7 PA Towns

    Who doesn’t like a county (or state) park, or a newer trend–converting old railroad beds into “rail trails”–resurfacing them for walkers, joggers, bikers and roller skaters? We sure love and use them. This story begins happily, with York County spending $100,000 to improve the Old Northern Central Railroad tracks and a portion of the York County Heritage Rail Trail that runs alongside them. Where did the money come from–taxpayers? Nope. It came from the Marcellus Shale industry, from the impact fee levied as part of the Act 13 law. In fact York County has received, so far, nearly 3/4 of a million dollars from that fund–even though there’s no active shale drilling in the county–thanks to Act 13.

    But the story ends badly, because quite likely starting next year, all of that impact fee money will disappear (see PA Supreme Court Won’t Reconsider Act 13, Impact Fee Now in Doubt). There will be no more impact fee money because seven townships in PA got their knickers in a twist, insisting their own layman zoning regulations were better than a set of statewide, uniform regulations designed by geologists and experts. So the seven petulant towns sued to toss out large portions of the Act 13 law, and it now looks like the impact fee will be tossed out too….
    Read More “Happy Story Ends Badly Because of 7 PA Towns”

  • | | | | | | | | |

    Survey Says! OU Survey of Local OH Officials on Utica’s Impacts

    Two days ago the Ohio University Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs released the findings of its much anticipated Ohio Shale Development Community Impact Survey. During summer of 2013, the Voinovich School distributed more than 500 surveys to local elected officials across 17 counties experiencing the majority of shale activity and development in Ohio. The survey assesses the impact of shale development within 17 counties in eastern Ohio, with a focus on population, housing, public safety, infrastructure, environment, local employment, area business activity, and economic development. Some 200 of those surveys were returned and the data tabulated.

    What did the survey find? Ohio’s local elected officials say Utica Shale drilling has caused an marked increase in jobs and the occupancy rate at hotels. But Utica drilling has also caused some pollution issues and a big increase in the demand for water supplies. This is a very interesting study (full copy embedded below)…
    Read More “Survey Says! OU Survey of Local OH Officials on Utica’s Impacts”

  • | | | | |

    Latest Hypocritical Protest of PA’s State Forest Drilling Plan

    A handful of anti-drilling nutters–mostly washed up hippies from the 60s–held a protest rally in Harrisburg at the PA State Capitol yesterday to object to the very thing one of their icons, Ed Rendell (and his DEP Secretary John Hanger) themselves did: allow a little bit of drilling under (not on) state forests for natural gas. The hypocrisy was on full display as a small group, inflated by media reports as some sort of huge, massive movement thing, gathered to get their photo op before retiring to the nearest Starbucks to sip coffee created by machines operating on natural gas in a shop heated with natural gas to discuss how great it feels to relive the good ole days of protesting.

    Here’s how the reliably anti-drilling StateImpact Pennsylvania reported the so-called “rally”…
    Read More “Latest Hypocritical Protest of PA’s State Forest Drilling Plan”

  • | | | | |

    Checking in on ecorpStim’s 100% Waterless Fracking, New Video

    checking inecorpStim has poked their heads up again to try and catch a bit of attention for their innovative waterless fracking solution. A press release issued yesterday by the company (full copy below) touts a new short video about their technology and promises that their “non-flammable propane stimulation” solution, developed in “2013,” will roll out in field demonstrations by “the end of this year.” We gave the video a watch a liked it (see it below).

    MDN has had our eye on eCORP, ecorpStim’s parent company, since 2012 when they attempted but ultimately failed to cut a deal with landowners in Tioga County, NY to lease a large swath of land and potentially use a waterless fracking technology (from Canadian GASFRAC) to avoid New York’s ongoing moratorium (see Tioga County, NY Lease Deal with eCORP Falls Apart). It was after the wheels came off that deal that ecorpStim changed gears to develop their own waterless fracking solution.
    Read More “Checking in on ecorpStim’s 100% Waterless Fracking, New Video”

  • | | | |

    Fracking Debate at Binghamton U: Holko vs Steingraber

    Last night MDN editor Jim Willis attended a “You Defend It” debate at Binghamton University between pro-driller John Holko, president of Lanape Resources (Buffalo area), and anti-driller Sandra Steingraber, a so-called “scholar in residence” at Ithaca College and founder of New Yorkers Against Fracking. The debate was on the topic of whether or not New York should allow high volume hydraulic fracturing (shale fracking). The format was interesting and refreshing–NO audience participation allowed. No cat calls or clapping or hooting characteristic of hippie anti-drillers was allowed. Also, the debaters were not allowed to question each other or respond to the other’s arguments. It was the moderator (Binghamton attorney Rob Kilmer) asking them questions in turn–and that’s it. The audience, which MDN would estimate at 250-300 people, heard the best pro and con arguments from both sides. Refreshing. And, enlightening.

    If we could step back and make an observation about the poise and demeanor of the debaters, John Holko was relaxed and worked from no notes. Sandra Steingraber, whom we have perhaps uncharitably called nutty, was nuttier than ever. She looked tense and had many notes and every response to a question started and ended with how fracking leads to an environmental holocaust that’s killing Mother Earth. When grilled by Kilmer as to why fracking doesn’t seem to be creating widespread damage in Pennsylvania the way she portrays it would in New York, she responded (amazingly) it really is. Steingraber maintains “everyone” is hushed up by legal gag orders in PA that don’t allow residents to tell the truth of what’s happening. So you see, she was simply off the rails–yet again…
    Read More “Fracking Debate at Binghamton U: Holko vs Steingraber”

  • | | | | |

    3 Anti-Drilling MD Commissioners Want Fracking Delayed…Surprise!

    It’s been a loooong road in Maryland, evaluating whether or not they should, and if so how, to move forward with hydraulic fracturing of shale in two counties in the state. Failed Gov. Martin O’Malley appointed a commission nearly three years ago to study it. A couple of studies have been created with two more still to go–due by August 1st of this year. The two remaining studies are nebulous “heath effects” (sound familiar?) and economic impacts from drilling. MDN has always joked that Maryland was the only state more dysfunctional than New York when it comes to shale drilling. We were wrong–New York is at the bottom of the heap. We think Maryland could actually beat us to the drill bit. Maybe.

    However, we noticed an op-ed written by three members of the Maryland Safe-Drilling Advisory Commission, all three anti-drilling, that argues Maryland should be *more* like New York and delay. They say, in essence, “Ain’t no way those two studies can done in time.” So the answer? Delay. Hey, the delay strategy has worked in spades for NY–why not try it in MD? Here’s the op-ed (and what you get when you appoint anti-drillers to a drilling commission)…
    Read More “3 Anti-Drilling MD Commissioners Want Fracking Delayed…Surprise!”

  • | | |

    State College Teens Help Out with Shale Network Water Sampling

    Penn State and other organizations sponsor an initiative called the Shale Network. The Shale Network is a group of volunteers who sample local rivers and streams to ensure Marcellus drilling is not having a negative effect on local waterways. So far, we’ve not heard of a single instance where the testing has turned up a problem.

    Part of the Shale Network is the Teen Shale Network, which involves local high school students from the State College, PA area to help with the testing–as a way to educate them on field science. To which we say, great! The kids were out freezing their derriere’s off recently, taking samples in Black Moshannon State Park…
    Read More “State College Teens Help Out with Shale Network Water Sampling”

  • | | | | |

    Expect “Frackgate” to be an Issue in Ohio for a While

    Anti-drillers in Ohio, like the Sierra Club, have dubbed the “revelation” that the Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources (ODNR) once crafted a communications plan to deal with nutjobs (like them) a scandal, so they’ve take to calling it “frackgate” (see ODNR Ticks Off Anti-Drilling Sierra Club with Drilling PR Plan). Relatedly, we also told you about Gov. John Kasich already throwing in the towel and admitting defeat on the matter of drilling in a single state forest and two state parks (see The Disgusting PR Mess in Ohio – No One Smells Pretty).

    You can expect “frackgate” to continue to be an issue in Ohio for a while because of the upcoming governor’s race. As we previously pointed out, the liberal Dems never let a good manufactured controversy (or crisis) go to waste. They’re now whispering about Kasich’s “enemies list” from the ODNR plan (even though Kasich had nothing to do with authoring the PR plan). By the way–they are enemies–of truth and common sense and reasonableness. Being good libdems, they will continue to harp on the “frackgate” issue, using a sycophantic press. Here’s the latest example of an article with absolutely no new information, the only purpose of which is to keep the story alive and in the minds of voters:
    Read More “Expect “Frackgate” to be an Issue in Ohio for a While”

  • | | | | |

    PA Supreme Court Won’t Reconsider Act 13, Impact Fee Now in Doubt

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court continues their lunacy. On Friday they obstinately said they would not revisit their decision on the Act 13 Marcellus drilling law passed in early 2012 (see Ongoing Fallout from PA Supreme Court’s Wrong Act 13 Decision). PA Gov. Tom Corbett asked them to reconsider but the haughty response is a big “no way.” And so the very real possibility that the Supreme Court has just shut off the spigot to $200 million+ per year in impact fees. The Supremes vacated large sections of the Act 13 law that involve the collection and distribution of the Act 13 impact fee, a fee that has benefited countless communities around the state–particularly those where drilling’s impact is felt the most (hence the name). Now? Screw you seems to be the attitude of the justices.

    And so we hope the seven “brave” townships that sued and kept suing are happy that they’ve just hosed the entire state with their actions–spoiling it for everyone. Congratulations…
    Read More “PA Supreme Court Won’t Reconsider Act 13, Impact Fee Now in Doubt”

  • | | | |

    New Staffers on Way at PA DEP O&G Courtesy Higher Permit Fees

    PA’s Secretary of the Dept. of Environmental Protection, Chris Abruzzo, told lawmakers last week that he plans to hire “several dozen” new staffers in the oil and gas regulation area of the DEP by using new money from a bump up in well permitting fees. Abruzzo said the current 83 inspectors in the field are enough to get the job done, but what they do need is extra help back in the office–support staff.

    MDN told you last September that well permit fees are set to go up 56%–from $3,200 per horizontal well to $5,000 (see Coming Soon: PA Drillers to Pay 56% More for Marcellus Permits). The new fee was approved by the DEP’s Environmental Quality Board but needs several more approvals before going into effect (expected soon). Once it does, the help wanted ads will begin to run…
    Read More “New Staffers on Way at PA DEP O&G Courtesy Higher Permit Fees”

  • | | | |

    The Disgusting PR Mess in Ohio – No One Smells Pretty

    You have to hand it to Democrats. As Rahm “the Godfather” Emanuel once stated, they never let a serious crisis to go to waste. And if there isn’t a serious crisis? They manufacture one, of course. And that’s what Dems are doing in Ohio. You know MDN is not a fan of RINO Gov. John Kasich and his penchant to raise severance taxes just to give it away to buy votes, and we’re certainly no fans of his jingoistic “foreigner” hunting. But Kasich is being unfairly targeted by Democrats over the recent “revelation” that the ODNR had a public relations plan cooked up to deal with nutjobs (mostly Dems) who would oppose drilling under (not on) one state forest and two state parks (see ODNR Ticks Off Anti-Drilling Sierra Club with Drilling PR Plan). The Dems are now calling for an investigation. (Funny how they never want to investigate our lawless President, isn’t it? But we digress.)

    Kasich now says he doesn’t want any drilling under (not on) that one state forest and two state parks, and hasn’t wanted it for a year and a half–although he never publicly announced it. Translation: the Dems have already won the PR war on this issue and have made Kasich back down. Kasich should have, instead, thrown it in their faces by pushing forward with a plan. Here’s the sad story of a complicit media, hypocritical Democrats, and wimpy RINO Republicans (a disgusting mess)…
    Read More “The Disgusting PR Mess in Ohio – No One Smells Pretty”

  • | |

    EPA Issues Final “Guidance” Defining Diesel Fuel re Frack Fluid

    Ten days ago the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a “guidance” to define what is and is not diesel fuel for the purposes of deciding (on a case by case basis) whether or not a driller can use that substance in their fracking fluid. In 2005 Congress passed a law that says diesel fuel can only be used as a component in fracking fluid if specifically approved, on a case by case basis. Very few (if any) drillers use diesel fuel in their fracking fluid. These days, the race is on to see how green fracking fluid can be made (see Fracking Fluids/Technology Getting Greener Each Year). However, the EPA feels duty-bound (we’d call it zealous) to ensure everyone knows exactly what is, and is not, diesel fuel for the purposes of complying with the law. The guidance just released establishes those boundaries.

    Below is the EPA announcement making what was previously a draft guidance a final guidance, along with a copy of the guidance itself…
    Read More “EPA Issues Final “Guidance” Defining Diesel Fuel re Frack Fluid”

  • | |

    EPA OIG Begins Project to “Evaluate” Water Threats from Fracking

    MDN has warned you for years that the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has an earnest desire to take over (illegally, in our opinion) the role of regulating oil and gas drilling in this country. Regulation of oil and gas falls, Constitutionally, to the individual states–not the federal government. So meddling bureaucrats, like the EPA’s Office of Inspector General (OIG), have to use creative excuses to begin the process of a federal takeover–and they only have a few years left in Obama’s term to do it (we hope). What better excuse to use than fracking may, might, theoretically could, possibly, concerningly, disturbingly, maybe…threaten water supplies. And so of course the OIG needs to hurry up and take a look at that–before time runs out! It’s what comes after “taking a look” that concerns us.

    Below is a memo from the Acting Administrator for Water saying she’s about to convene a project that will “determine and evaluate what regulatory authority is available to the EPA and states, identify potential threats to water resources from hydraulic fracturing, and evaluate the EPA’s and states’ responses to them.” Translation: We’re comin’ for ya states–and we’re really comin’ for you drillers. Hey OIG–your bosses in the EPA are already in the midst of a multi-year “study” of fracking with a final report due soon (see Big News: EPA Fracking Study Delayed 2 Years – Now Due 2016). Why do you need to meddle too? Here’s the OIG’s opening salvo in the fracking wars:
    Read More “EPA OIG Begins Project to “Evaluate” Water Threats from Fracking”