Hydraulic Fracturing

  • | | | |

    Univ Chicago, Princeton & MIT Study: Fracking Benefits Everyone

    A new study by researchers at the University of Chicago, Princeton University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) finds that the benefits of fracking outweigh the costs. You read that right. Three big lefty schools have released a study saying fracking benefits everyone. “The Local Economic and Welfare Consequences of Hydraulic Fracturing” (full copy below) looked at nine different shale basins. The authors say fracking activity yields $1,300 to $1,900 per year on average to each household in those basins. That’s a $64 billion yearly benefit–from fracking. So says the libs. Fracking benefits include, “a 7 percent increase in average income, driven by rises in wages and royalty payments, a 10 percent increase in employment, and a 6 percent increase in housing prices.” It is the largest and most comprehensive study of its kind…
    Read More “Univ Chicago, Princeton & MIT Study: Fracking Benefits Everyone”

  • | | |

    3 Parents Give Birth to New Fracking Co: BJ Services

    Update: MDN’s headline and opening graf below are a tad confusing. As we pointed out in our previous story (here) BJ Services used to exist as a standalone company before it was purchased by, and merged into, Baker Hughes in 2009–for $5.5 billion. Now BH is spinning what is left of the company–an internal division–back into a standalone company once again. So perhaps our tongue-in-cheek analogy of a new company being “born” with “3 parents” is confusing. Our apologies! And our thanks to a sharp MDN reader for pointing out the confusion.

    A quick post to note the birth of a new fracking company. As we noted in November, Baker Hughes, Goldman Sachs, and CSL Capital Management pledged to combine investments and assets to form BJ Services, a “pressure pumping” (i.e. fracking) company (see Baker Hughes, CSL & GS Form New US Fracking Co: BJ Services). Baby BJ has officially arrived and is now open for business. Yes, baby BJ has three parents. Hey, if three parents worked for Bridget Jones’s Baby, it can work for a fracker…
    Read More “3 Parents Give Birth to New Fracking Co: BJ Services”

  • | | | |

    Fracking Added $3.5 Trillion, 4.6M Jobs to Economy in 3 Years

    New research from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) reveals a couple of astonishing facts: From 2012-2014, hydraulic fracturing was responsible for creating $3.5 trillion worth of new wealth. We can’t even get our brains around that number! Another fact: From 2012-2014, fracking create 4.6 million new jobs. Although we’ve experienced a big downturn since 2014, can you imagine how the fracking industry will come back under President Trump? Happy day are here again! More from the latest research report by NBER, titled “Fracking, Drilling, and Asset Pricing: Estimating the Economic Benefits of the Shale Revolution”…
    Read More “Fracking Added $3.5 Trillion, 4.6M Jobs to Economy in 3 Years”

  • | |

    Obama EPA One Last Swipe at Fossil Fuels, Changes Fracking Report

    We now know that it’s possible to bribe people who work for the federal Environmental Protection Agency. That is, big money donors DO have a say in how “science” is presented by the agency. The one great, huge, towering problem that anti-drillers have is that there is no scientific evidence that supports their wild claims that fracking contaminates water–which is their favorite lie to spread. When the Environmental Protection Agency arrived at the same conclusion–fracking doesn’t pollute water–after four years of studying it, that really took the wind out of the sails of rabid fossil fuel haters (see EPA Draft Report Says Fracking Doesn’t Pollute Groundwater Supplies). The EPA reviewed research from over 950 studies and even conducted nine of their own primary studies. Conclusion: fracking doesn’t pollute water supplies. What’s a good fossil fuel hater to do? Pressure the EPA to change the outcome of their study. And pressure they did. So much so that in the final version of the report just released (full copy below), the EPA slightly modified the language. In the original draft report, the language says, “hydraulic fracturing activities have not led to widespread, systemic impacts to drinking water resources.” The final report deletes that statement and provides language that says “under some circumstances” the fracking process can harm local water supplies, but because there are “gaps” in the data, the EPA can’t say how often or how much such impacts happen. In other words, all of the science is still the same. There is no evidence that fracking hurts water. The EPA simply gave their Big Green friends some headlines to play with for a few days. Perhaps it’s no coincidence the report is 666 pages long…
    Read More “Obama EPA One Last Swipe at Fossil Fuels, Changes Fracking Report”

  • | |

    EPA Final Fracking Report (May) Say Fracking Doesn’t Harm Water

    In 2015 the federal Environmental Protection Agency, after spending four years to evaluate 950 studies on hydraulic fracturing, conducted nine of their own original studies, and came to the conclusion that there is no “widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water” from fracking (see EPA Draft Report Says Fracking Doesn’t Pollute Groundwater Supplies). That finding caused anti-fossil fuel wackos to become apoplectic. Antis immediately began a campaign of bullying and intimidation against the EPA to get them to change the finding. That is, to cheat. It looked like it was working when the EPA appointed a special, stacked panel to review the original draft report, and (unsurprisingly) they questioned the original finding (see Will EPA Whore Itself to Antis and Change Fracking Water Study?). The final report is due to be released soon–before the Obamadroids leave town in January. Everyone is waiting to see what the EPA will say in the final report. Interestingly to us, the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI) says the EPA will “likely” stick to the original conclusion–that fracking does not contaminate groundwater…
    Read More “EPA Final Fracking Report (May) Say Fracking Doesn’t Harm Water”

  • | | | |

    Penn State Goes Methane Migration Hunting – Using Big Data

    We’re always leery when we read about scientists doing data mining instead of real in-the-field research. So our radar was on alert when we read about the latest data mining project now under way at Penn State. Using a $1 million grant from the National Science Foundation, a cross-disciplinary team of Penn State computer scientists and geoscientists will study methane concentrations in the Pennsylvania’s streams, rivers and private water wells. They will look to see if wells and streams and rivers close to fracked Marcellus Shale wells have higher concentrations of methane than those not close to shale wells. In other words, does fracking cause methane to migrate into nearby water sources? That’s what they’re trying to prove, or disprove. The problem, from our perspective, is whether or not the data being analyzed contains readings of methane levels present in those wells, streams and rivers BEFORE any kind of shale drilling happened. If you don’t have the before and after, the data is useless. Drillers have discovered where the best locations are to drill–so that’s where they drill. (Brilliant, we know.) So it stands to reason naturally occurring methane already exists in those locations. Just because a nearby well or stream has higher levels of methane does not prove a shale well caused it. The methane may have already existed in the same quantities long before any shale drilling. You see the problem? At any rate, here’s the lowdown on another million dollar research project to give the Marcellus yet another anal exam…
    Read More “Penn State Goes Methane Migration Hunting – Using Big Data”

  • | |

    Feds Dole Out $4.8M to National Labs for Fracking Research

    shale-research-topics
    Click for larger version

    The feds are falling in love with fracking. Who knew?! The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) has just awarded six research projects to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories to advance fundamental shale research. The two-year projects, totaling $4.8 million, “will investigate the processes associated with hydrocarbon extraction from unconventional shale reservoirs and lead to a better understanding of factors affecting prudent resource development.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has three of the projects. The other three go to Los Alamos National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories and the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) National Accelerator Laboratory. The projects aim to fill in “knowledge gaps” and will ultimately, hopefully, lead to fracking done more safely and in an “environmentally responsible” way. Here’s a description of the studies the grants will fund…
    Read More “Feds Dole Out $4.8M to National Labs for Fracking Research”

  • | | |

    Baker Hughes, CSL & GS Form New US Fracking Co: BJ Services

    bj-servicesThe world’s third largest oilfield services company, Baker Hughes, has struggled to stay afloat given the radical reduction in revenue they get for the services they offer. BH’s recent third quarter update showed the company lost $430 million, which is down from losing $912 million in 3Q15, a positive sign we suppose (see Baker Hughes 3Q16: Bleeding Slows, but Hefty Loss of $430M). Halliburton tried to buy BH last year, but earlier this year the Obama DOJ killed the proposed merger (see Obama DOJ Kills Halliburton/Baker Hughes Merger, Deal “Terminated”). Last month GE Oil & Gas launched its own takeover/merger with BH (see Breaking: Who Needs Halliburton? Baker Hughes Merging with GE O&G). In the midst of all that, BH is not sitting on its hands. Yesterday the company announced it will spin off its North American shale fracking business into a new company, BJ Services. The deal involves investments and assets contributed from both Goldman Sachs and CSL Capital Management. Here’s the lowdown on BH’s new “pressure pumping” (i.e. fracking) deal, and the real reason BH is doing it…
    Read More “Baker Hughes, CSL & GS Form New US Fracking Co: BJ Services”

  • | | | |

    Maryland Publishes New Fracking Rules, 30-Day Comment Period

    going-through-the-motionsAs MDN reported in September, the Maryland Dept. of the Environment (MDE) beat the Oct. 1 deadline to release onerous new fracking regulations (see Maryland Beats Deadline, Submits Onerous New Fracking Rules). The new rules, for all intents and purposes, will result in a defacto ban on fracking in Maryland. Which is a shame. We couldn’t find a copy of the rules at the time. The MDE published the final rules in the Monday edition of the Maryland Register (see it below). What happens now? A 30-day public comment period begins, which will result (already has resulted) in lots of petulant bleating about banning fracking in the Old Line State, after which the regs will get adopted, and beginning next year when fracking can begin, it won’t. Frankly, Maryland is just going through the motions…
    Read More “Maryland Publishes New Fracking Rules, 30-Day Comment Period”

  • | | | |

    Virginia Adopts New Frack Chemical Regs – Fracking to Begin?

    frack-here-frack-now.pngVirginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe recently approved changes to environmental regulations that requires “mandatory disclosure of fracking chemicals, baseline water testing and monitoring, and spill prevention and response planning.” While leftie Big Green groups love the new rules, the drilling industry is working to ensure trade secrets (exact combinations of chemicals) can’t be discovered by using Freedom of Information Act laws. The big news, for MDN, is that with the enactment of these new rules (see a copy below), it appears shale fracking is a huge step closer to happening in the Old Dominion…
    Read More “Virginia Adopts New Frack Chemical Regs – Fracking to Begin?”

  • | | | |

    Utica Drillers Using Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD)

    mpd
    Click for larger version

    This post is far (far) more technical than the typical post on MDN. It is aimed at those in the drilling business. However, a general understanding will help everyone interested in what’s happening in the Utica Shale. We spotted a story that claims MPD–or managed pressure drilling–is emerging as the “preferred” drilling method in the Utica Shale. The article is written by engineers who work for Weatherford, the world’s fourth largest oilfield services company (and a company with major customers/operations in the Utica, i.e. a vested interest). The first, most obvious question is: What in the world is MPD? We went looking for a layman’s definition. The simplest definition we found was, “cheating Mother Nature.” MDP involves managing the pressure in the well, and drilling mud…
    Read More “Utica Drillers Using Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD)”

  • | |

    Trump Victory Good News for the Shale Industry

    happy dance - SnoopyDonald Trump’s victory in winning the presidency–whether you voted for him or not–is a victory for the oil and gas industry. Fracking is now not in danger of being banned, as it would have been with Hillary Clinton. The Washington “swamp” (“wetland” for greenies) as Trump and his running mate Mike Pence call it–is about to get drained. That includes the rogue, out-of-control Environmental Protection Agency, among others. Radical environmentalists are shocked and suicidal. We’re delighted! The people of this country have spoken…
    Read More “Trump Victory Good News for the Shale Industry”

  • | | | | | | |

    PA Senators File to Join Case Against DRBC Fracking Moratorium

    lawsuitIn May MDN told you about a group of brave landowners in Wayne County, PA who have had their property rights stolen by the Delaware River Basin Commission (see Wayne County, PA Landowner Sues DRBC Over Fracking Ban). They filed a lawsuit against the DRBC asking a judge to declare the DRBC does not have jurisdiction to prevent construction of a natural gas well. Several northeastern PA counties (unfortunately) are located in the Delaware River Basin and the DRBC has steadfastly refused to allow them to drill any shale wells, citing concerns that the Delaware River supplies fresh water to millions downstream–even though they can’t explain how that water might get contaminated. A few months later, the DRBC’s best friend and patron, THE Delaware Riverkeeper, sued to join the lawsuit to help defend the inept DRBC (see Delaware Riverkeeper “Intervenes” to Protect its Patsy – the DRBC). Last week three PA senators filed to join the lawsuit on behalf of the landowners that they represent. Predictably, THE Delaware Riverkeeper wants to prevent the senators from joining the lawsuit…
    Read More “PA Senators File to Join Case Against DRBC Fracking Moratorium”

  • | | |

    Report: What if Fracking was Banned, as Hillary Wants?

    Chamber of CommerceThe U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently launched a “What If…?” series to counter the radical “keep it in the ground” movement–a movement that irrationally hates the use of fossil fuels. In August the Chamber released their first such report, titled “What If…Energy Production was Banned on Federal Lands and Waters?” (see Chamber Report Details Why ‘Keep it in the Ground’ a Disaster). In Sept. they released their second report (see Report: What If America’s Energy Renaissance Never Happened?). In Oct. they released the third report (see Report: What If the U.S. was Forced to Pay EU Energy Prices?). Last Friday the Chamber released the fourth report in the series, very timely considering the election tomorrow. The newest in the series is titled, “What If…Hydraulic Fracturing Was Banned?” (full copy below). Under a Hillary Clinton presidency, that’s a very real possibility. Clinton said during the Democratic debates not many months ago: “By the time we get through all of my conditions, I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place” (see A President Hillary Clinton Would Ban Most Fracking). Either she didn’t really mean what she said and she lied, or she did mean it. We tend to think it’s the later. So what would happen if fracking were essentially banned nationwide? According to research by the Chamber, by 2022 the country would lose 15 million jobs now created by fracking (in addition to the 94 million workers without jobs now), and everyone would pay twice (or more) than they do now for electric & gasoline. Not a pretty picture…
    Read More “Report: What if Fracking was Banned, as Hillary Wants?”

  • | |

    EIA: Horizontal Fracked Wells Superior Performers

    EIAWe laugh every time we read about peak oil and peak natural gas theorists, and mainstream “reporters” from places like the New York Times trumpeting that any day now natural gas is going to peter out. It’s just a flash in the pan. “Everybody” knows that shale wells are weak, pathetic performers than run out of juice almost as fast as their drilled. We’ve read stories about how shale drilling is a ponzi scheme. We’ve read stories that very soon we’ll run out of new places to drill, and then it’s all over. Except…except it’s all not true. None other than the U.S. Energy Information Administration has just posted a brief article that details, using real research, that horizontally drilled shale wells are MORE productive over the long-term than conventional wells. That is, they are more productive for longer than a conventional well. But that won’t stop the peakers and ponzi schemers from pedaling their pap…
    Read More “EIA: Horizontal Fracked Wells Superior Performers”

  • | | | | |

    Group of Radical PA Doctors Pass Resolution Calling for Frack Ban

    enviro naziThe 16,000-member Pennsylvania Medical Society is controlled by a small and dedicated group of radical leftists. They’re also shockingly stupid, for doctors and medical people (you might want to seek medical care in another state). The PA Medical Society’s 300-member House of Delegates voted unanimously to pass a resolution calling for a total ban on fracking in the Keystone State. Stop it–all of it–right now. That’s what they said. Even though there is no evidence that fracking harms human health. That is, independent studies done all say the same thing: fracking is safe. However, biased bought-and-paid-for studies say fracking will kill ‘ya. We find it astonishing that there was not one single delegate who didn’t vote for the resolution–which proves our point that radical, lock-step lefties control the society…
    Read More “Group of Radical PA Doctors Pass Resolution Calling for Frack Ban”