Impact of WV’s New Chemical Tank Law on Marcellus Drillers
An important update on the new rules coming to West Virginia drillers impacting how they use above ground chemical storage tanks. As MDN previously reported, the WV legislature passed SB373 in the closing hours of the 2014 legislative session (see Fate of 3 WV Laws that Impact Marcellus/Utica Drilling). That bill was in response to a chemical leak that affected the drinking water for 300,000 WV residents. Even though the leak was not related to oil and gas drilling (it was related to coal mining), the new rules governing above ground storage tanks for chemicals affect a number of industries, including the Marcellus Shale drilling industry.
Although the final language of the bill has yet to be set in stone and signed into law, enough of it is now known that it can be analyzed. The bright legal beagles at the energy law firm of Lewis Glasser Casey & Rollins, PLLC have done just that. Here is how the newly minted SB373, once signed into law, will impact WV’s oil and gas industry:
Read More “Impact of WV’s New Chemical Tank Law on Marcellus Drillers”

It is the end of an ignominious era. Carol Collier, whose own anti-drilling views have stopped any forward progress on potential Marcellus Shale drilling in the Delaware River Basin, will tomorrow leave the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) that she has headed for 15 years. Last September when she announced she would retire this March, we predicted her platitudes about finalizing draft shale drilling plans would go nowhere. We were right (see
What do you call it when a company pays money to local organizations and agencies before the project has been fully approved by federal, state and local agencies? These payments, mind you, are not fees for permits or licenses, but voluntary chunks of money offered to groups that may be affected by the project if it’s built–in this case a pipeline. Is it called, Good corporate citizenship? Being a responsible member of the local community? Or perhaps, payola?