Permanently Canceling RGGI Carbon Tax was Worth Late PA Budget
Sometimes politics is a game of “chicken” whereby you must keep fighting and wait out the other side when you *know* you are in the right. Such was the case with Pennsylvania Democrats’ insistence that the state join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) carbon tax scheme. RGGI aims to force coal- and gas-fired power plants to shut down by making them super expensive to operate. Tax them out of existence on the theory that unreliable renewables like wind and solar would replace them. But Republicans in the PA Senate kept fighting—for seven long years—and finally won (see VICTORY! PA Budget Deal Kills RGGI Carbon Tax for Good). Republicans played “chicken” with Democrats during this year’s budget negotiations and got the Dems to cave after almost five months with no budget in place. Read More “Permanently Canceling RGGI Carbon Tax was Worth Late PA Budget”
The Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board (EQB) held a meeting yesterday to consider whether or not to accept a petition by radical green groups, including the Clean Air Council and Environmental Integrity Project, to “study” the issue of increasing setbacks for shale drilling so far that it would ban ALL new Marcellus/Utica drilling in the Keystone State (no exaggeration). The EQB tabled a decision on whether to accept the petition back in April (see 
Here we go again. Pennsylvania Democrat State Reps. Chris Pielli, (Chester), and Tarik Khan, (Philadelphia), have introduced a bill that would establish a severance tax on natural gas production. Specifically, the legislation introduces a per-volume severance tax on natural gas operations. The bill would place the new severance tax on top of the existing impact fee (i.e., tax), creating a double tax on the Marcellus industry. Adding a severance tax to the existing impact fee would instantly make PA’s tax on natural gas extraction the highest in the nation. The purpose is not revenue generation but the death of the Marcellus production in the Keystone State. Do the Dems never tire of attacking the Marcellus industry? 
Pennsylvania has a big problem. The state is retiring older coal- and gas-fired power plants faster than it can add new plants. Plus, the state needs to *grow* its electric generation capacity to meet new demand from AI data centers. PA State Senator Gene Yaw has a solution: modify the existing 1971 Economic Development for a Growing Economy (EDGE) tax credit program by adding a provision granting a tax credit for any $400+ million investment in “baseload power generation” (i.e., gas-fired power generation). Yaw wants to make it a no-brainer for power plant builders to make the Keystone State their destination for new projects. 
Pennsylvania assesses an impact fee (PA’s version of a severance tax) on shale drillers, raising revenues that are paid to local municipalities (60% collected) and the black hole of Harrisburg politicians (40%). Yesterday, the PA Independent Fiscal Office (IFO) issued an estimate of how much the impact fee will raise this year, with the funds distributed in April of next year. The IFO says it expects, based on the price of natural gas and the number of new and existing wells, that PA will generate $239.9 million from the impact fee in 2025, a huge $75.3 million (46%) increase from 2024. The average fee per well generated will be $19,056 in 2025, up from $13,560 (41%) in 2024. 
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) published proposed revisions to its Chapter 102 Erosion and Sediment Control permit. The DEP is now accepting comments on the changes until January 20. The primary goal of the revision is “regulatory alignment.” Since the original policy was written in 2012, Pennsylvania passed the Chapter 78a (Unconventional) regulations (in 2016) and updated the ESCGP-4 permit (in 2024). The new draft updates the policy to match these legally binding rules rather than creating entirely new standards. The most significant change coming is an increase in setbacks to”support facilities” from 900 feet to 1,320 feet. 
In October 2024, the Bidenistas announced seven hydrogen hub projects (from 33 finalists) that would receive a collective $7 billion in federal funding (see 
Yesterday, the Pennsylvania Independent Fiscal Office (IFO) released its latest quarterly Natural Gas Production Report for July through September 2025 (full copy below). There were 116 new horizontal wells spud (drilled) in 3Q25, a huge increase of 53 wells (+84%) compared to 3Q24. Natural gas production volume was 1,934 billion cubic feet (Bcf) in 3Q25, up 93 Bcf (+5%) from 1,841 Bcf produced in 3Q24. The average Pennsylvania spot hub price was $2.18, an increase of $0.74 (+51%) from the prior year’s $1.44. All in all, it was a great third quarter for the PA Marcellus. The numbers are going in the right direction. 
Today is data center day here at MDN, given that most of our main stories today revolve around the issue of data centers, facilities full of computers that need enormous amounts of electricity, most of which will be generated by gas-fired power plants. This past summer, Pennsylvania’s newest U.S. Senator, Dave McCormick, convened the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit in Pittsburgh. Together with the Trump administration, McCormick announced a mind-blowing $92 billion of promised new investment for PA mostly related to AI data centers (see 
Continuing on our data center theme, a new article by MDN friend Gordon Tomb, a senior fellow with the Commonwealth Foundation, makes the case that Pennsylvania needs more energy and sensible regulation to lure data centers. There is a stark contrast to what PA legislators are offering. On the Republican side, legislators are offering a bill that would expedite permits for data center projects that meet or exceed federal standards (see 
We have to (immodestly) say that we spotted the environmental left’s opposition to AI data centers a mile away. We were the first to alert you to PA green groups lining up to oppose data centers based on an irrational hatred of the fossil energy that powers them (see 
Two weeks ago, Pennsylvania finally passed a budget, four months late. As part of the deal struck between Democrats and Republicans, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) carbon tax scheme was permanently ash-canned (see 
Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board (EQB) will hold a meeting on Tuesday, December 9, to consider whether or not to accept a petition by radical green groups, including the Clean Air Council and Environmental Integrity Project, to “study” the issue of increasing setbacks for shale drilling so far that it would ban ALL new Marcellus/Utica drilling in the Keystone State. The EQB tabled a decision on accepting the petition back in April (see 
Earlier this month, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) approved a Tentative Order by a 3-2 vote, proposing a statewide model tariff (tax) to manage the growing impact of large-load customers, such as AI data centers, on the electric grid (see 
It’s time to revisit a topic we’ve covered many times before — philanthropy in the Marcellus/Utica region. Drillers and pipeline companies in the M-U region already contribute to the region through the generous lease bonuses and royalties paid to landowners. In addition to the billions that flow to landowners, M-U companies cumulatively donate millions of dollars to local communities and nonprofit organizations. Here’s the latest example of that in action: The Marcellus Shale Coalition (MSC) says its members (and their employees) have embraced this Thanksgiving season by giving back through food drives, volunteering at local charities, and supporting community initiatives. 
We first told you about a frac sand company called Smart Sand some 13 years ago (see