Shale Gas vs Wind and Solar – A Few Sobering Facts
We’re certainly not anti-wind or anti-solar. We believe those technologies hold promise for the future. But they simply can’t compete with natural gas as the most economical and even the most environmentally friendly way of supplying electricity here and now. Every form of energy has its advantages and disadvantages. The fact (not opinion) that natural gas beats so-called renewables here and now is not just our opinion. We spotted an excellent column–from an Indian professor–that points out some sobering facts in the shale gas vs wind and solar debate…
Read More “Shale Gas vs Wind and Solar – A Few Sobering Facts”

Shell has had an on-again, off-again, on-again love affair with North American shale (can anyone say “schizophrenia”?). In March, Shell’s new CEO Ben van Beurden said the company was not impressed with American shale plays and cutting back (see
Long before the words “Marcellus” and “Utica” entered the public discourse and consciousness of Ohioans, there was the Clinton Sandstone. For years conventional drillers have been sinking wells in the Clinton, which is found 4,500 feet below the surface (the Marcellus and Utica Shale layers are deeper). The Clinton lies under 25 counties in eastern Ohio. Over the years, some 35,000 conventional (vertical) wells have tapped the Clinton Sandstone in Ohio. EnerVest, one of the largest acreage holders in the Utica Shale (and in the Clinton Sandstone), has embarked on a great experiment. What if you turned a Clinton Sandstone well horizontal, like a Utica or Marcellus well? Would it work? Could you get more gas out of the sandstone by fracking it like shale? EnerVest has drilled seven horizontal wells so far, with a permit to drill another and a request to drill a ninth. Here’s the details, along with the differences between a Clinton horizontal well and a Utica horizontal well…