Range 4Q Production Hits 2.2 Bcf/d, Proved Reserves Hit 18.1 Tcfe
A pair of announcements yesterday gave us a little peek into the numbers Range Resources will release later this month as part of its quarterly update. In one update, Range (the very first driller to sink a Marcellus well back in 2004) reported averaging 2.2 billion cubic feet equivalent per day (Bcfe/d) for production in the Marcellus/Utica region during the fourth quarter of 2022. A separate announcement said Range’s proved reserves for all of 2022 hit 18.1 trillion cubic feet equivalent (Tcfe), up 2% over the prior year.
Read More “Range 4Q Production Hits 2.2 Bcf/d, Proved Reserves Hit 18.1 Tcfe”
Have you ever heard of reviving an expired lease through retroactive pooling and unitization? We sure hadn’t. But apparently, it’s a thing in the Marcellus region. According to the legal beagles at Pittsburgh energy law firm Houston Harbaugh, in some cases, landowners with leases that were expired are being notified those leases are now part of an amended (back-dated) declaration of pooling, which shows a date prior to the lease expiring.
Please don’t tell us politicians like Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and U.S. Senator Elizbeth “Pocahontas” Warren give a fig about global warming and carbon emissions. Their actions, along with the actions of other Democrat politicians, have blocked new natural gas pipelines into New England that would supply low-emission fuel to generate electricity for the region. When it gets brutally cold, as it did Feb 3-5, New England turns to burning oil and (yes) coal in order to keep the lights on for residents. It happened in December, and it happened again in February. So much for caring about Mom Earth. The actions of New England politicians speak so much louder than their many lying words…
Did you happen to catch President Biden’s State of the Union show? We didn’t. We couldn’t hack watching a doddering old fool spout nonsense for more than an hour. But we did catch the highlights from the speech. One highlight, in particular, was really funny. Biden was bashing Big Oil for “record profits” (he’s such a fool), and then, much to the horror of his handlers, Biden went off script and said that “We’re going to need oil for at least another decade.” The entire chamber erupted in laughter at such an asinine statement, which caught the old fool off guard, so he quickly added, “…and beyond that.”
The heads of three major oil and gas groups in the Appalachian region–the Marcellus Shale Coalition (representing Pennsylvania), the Gas and Oil Association of West Virginia, and the Ohio Oil and Gas Association–combined to pen an open letter to President Biden encouraging him to let the Marcellus/Utica “lead the way” in achieving our country’s shared goals for domestic, affordable, and clean energy. It’s a great letter making strong and cogent arguments for why more M-U natgas can reduce emissions and benefit not only the economy but the environment. There’s just one small problem…
We spotted a fascinating story out of Los Angeles about the city’s foolish and reckless action in abandoning its largest natural gas-fired power generation plant in favor of using hydrogen instead. Hydrogen is the Holy Grail for the left. At least, for some on the left. Many on the left (and, it seems, on the right too) want to replace natural gas with 100% hydrogen in gas-fired power plants because natgas produces carbon dioxide when it burns, and hydrogen does not. Except (we learned from this article), hydrogen power generation has one huge, glaring, problem…
NATIONAL: The clear and present danger in the electric transition; INTERNATIONAL: With years of high prices ahead, LNG buyers covet long-term deals; Will Asia start pulling large volumes of LNG away from Europe?
Once a month, the analysts at the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) issue the agency’s Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), their best guess about where energy prices and production will go in the next 12 months or so. We sometimes poke good-natured fun at the EIA because one month, their predictions go up, the next month, down, etc. What about the latest STEO dart board, published yesterday? EIA slashed the price of natural gas at the Henry Hub another 30% from the previous monthly STEO, saying natgas will average $3.40/MMBut in 2023, down from a forecast of $4.90 the month before. EIA’s new average price, if it holds, would be 50% lower than 2022’s average of $6.42/MMBtu.
Tuesday of last week, Freeport LNG, which has been out of operation since an explosion and fire in June 2022, asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for permission to begin re-introducing feedgas back into one of three liquefaction “trains” (units) at the facility. A day later, FERC agreed, and small amounts of gas began to flow (see 
The supposedly non-partisan U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), which increasingly appears to be influenced (if not corrupted) by the Bidenistas, published a post yesterday on the agency’s daily Today in Energy website with this headline: “Coal and natural gas plants will account for 98% of U.S. capacity retirements in 2023.” The thrust of the article is that dirty fossil energy is being phased out of electricity production in favor of unreliable, intermittent so-called renewables (like solar and wind). EIA says operators plan to retire 15.6 gigawatts (GW) of electric-generating capacity in the U.S. this year, mostly natural gas-fired (6.2 GW) and coal-fired (8.9 GW) power plants. But as usual with the Biden administration, key facts are left out of the article. We have the rest of the story…
“May the odds be ever in your favor.” – Hunger Games. For more than a year, we have covered the topic of the Bidenistas’ Hunger Games contest to award $7 billion to some 6-10 “hydrogen hubs” across the country. Each winning hub will receive $500 million to $1 billion of government largesse to help build a hub in a given region. The money for the hub projects was allocated as part of the so-called Infrastructure bill, passed in November 2021 (see 
Joe Biden has big plans to force you to change the way you get (and consume) your energy. He wants you to use hydrogen, electricity (generated by unreliable renewable sources like wind and solar), force you to capture your carbon dioxide (the stuff you breathe out with every breath you take), and in general, use anything other than fossil energy. Joe is happy to export LNG (a nasty fossil fuel), but only because other people will use it and not you. There’s one big problem with making Joe’s dystopian future a reality: The government bureaucracy and red tape that it spins, is preventing his preferred sources of energy from getting built and used. Isn’t it delicious? The very bureaucracy the left loves and adores is strangling the left’s attempts at the forced conversion of society to alternative energy.
You’ve heard of investment firms like BlackRock, and Vanguard Group, and Fidelity. But have you heard of VanEck? It’s much smaller than the biggies like BlackRock, but important all the same. VanEck is a global asset manager that offers active and passive investment portfolios in hard assets, emerging markets equity and debt, precious metals, fixed income, and other alternative asset classes. The CEO of the company, Jan van Eck, recently published a provocative post on the company’s website called, “ESG Died in 2022.” He takes on the issue of big investors (like BlackRock) throwing their weight around with proxy voting–a default way of running a company, making it bow to your whims.