Plum, PA Officials Hold Hearing on New Restrictions for Fracking
Nearly a month ago, local officials in Plum, PA (Allegheny County) approved a plan by Huntley & Huntley (H&H) to drill a series of Marcellus wells in their municipality (see Plum, PA Gives Huntley & Huntley Green Light for Shale Drilling). At that time, we told you about H&H plans to begin constructing a well pad in Plum in November (see Huntley & Huntley Starts Shale Drilling in Plum, PA Next Month). Plum’s leaders faced stiff opposition from some residents over their decision to conditionally approve H&H’s request. In Plum, fracking is allowed in any zone if a conditional use is granted. That’s what happened last month–the Plum Council issued a conditional use exception for H&H to drill on 92 acres near Coxcomb Hill Road in Plum. Fearing more requests will come from H&H, Plum officials have floated a proposed change to zoning ordinances (ordinances which haven’t been updated since 1993). The new change would only allow fracking in rural residential and industrial zones. H&H says the change is too restrictive. Some antis think it doesn’t go far enough. Last night Plum held a hearing about the proposed changes, with some 100 people showing up. According to press accounts, the crowd was about evenly split, for and against the proposed zoning changes. Here’s how it went down…
Read More “Plum, PA Officials Hold Hearing on New Restrictions for Fracking”
Shell’s $6 billion ethane cracker plant facility in Monaca (Beaver County), PA is about to ramp up construction of the numerous buildings that will house the equipment. Since 2014, Ate Visser, vice president of Appalachia petrochemicals at Shell Chemical, has been the guy in charge of the project (see 
In August MDN told you the West Virginia Oil & Natural Gas Association (WVONGA) plans to push, once again, for what MDN calls forced pooling lite in the next session of the legislature scheduled for early 2018 (see 
The guy who runs the investment firm Jana Partners, Barry Rosenstein, is a corporate raider. He invests millions in a company he’s targeted in order to get one or two people elected to the board of directors. Those people then agitate and force the company to lay off hundreds or thousands of employees, and sell off assets, in a bid to make the stock price jump. When the price does jump, corporate raiders like Rosenstein then sell their shares, making a profit on the new/higher price (buy low sell high). It may be legal, but we consider it immoral. In June, EQT, one of the biggest drillers in the Marcellus/Utica, announced a deal to buyout and merge in Rice Energy, another sizable M-U driller (see 
Rice Energy, while not the biggest, is certainly one of the best-operated drillers in the Marcellus/Utica. Rice issued their third quarter 2017 update last week. It will be the last quarterly update for the company as Rice shareholders will vote this week to sell out to larger competitor EQT. Because of the impending vote this Wednesday, Rice elected not to conduct an analyst phone call with the release of their 3Q17 update–we only have written statements to go by. The latest quarterly report shows Rice hit yet another record-high for production for natural gas and equivalents, producing 1.44 billion cubic feet equivalent per day (Bcfe/d). During 3Q17 Rice drilled 25 Marcellus wells and 7 Utica wells (32 total). The company lost $107 million during 3Q17, versus making a profit of $66 million in 3Q16. Rice is and always has been run by young guys (and gals). The Rice boys are Millennials. So in this last quarterly update, they displayed some of their trademark irreverent humor by coining a new word: shalennial. Dan Rice, CEO, said this in a quote in the release: “Our success is a testament to the core assets that we have acquired and developed with our shalennial team and I am highly confident that our operational momentum, as evidenced by our record third quarter results, will meaningfully contribute to EQT’s future success. We are excited to combine our core assets with EQT’s to create one of the most complete energy companies in the United States and derive even more long-term value for our shareholders.” A footnote next to the word shalennial defines the term thus: “Shalennial /SH?l?en??l/ noun: (1) an evolving, tech-driven leader of the shale generation; (2) an employee of Rice Energy.” We’ll sure miss Rice’s humor, and their go-get-em, can-do attitude, around the Marcellus/Utica shale patch…
Last week National Fuel Gas Company, headquartered in Western New York State with drilling subsidiary Seneca Resources and pipeline subsidiary Empire Pipeline, issued its fourth quarter (everyone else’s third quarter) 2017 update. In the accompanying analyst phone call, CEO Ronald Tanski blamed the delay of the Northern Access Pipeline project (delayed by the NY Dept. of Environmental Conservation) for lower earnings than the company would have otherwise realized. Thanks, business UNfriendly NY! You may recall in July NFG filed a lawsuit against the DEC for arbitrarily rejecting the project (see 
Yesterday the 800-pound gorilla in the natural gas space, Chesapeake Energy, issued its third quarter 2017 update. One of the highlights during the analyst phone call was CEO Doug Lawler’s bragging about the “world class” Marcellus Shale. During 3Q17 Chessy drilled and put online two Upper Marcellus wells in Susquehanna County, PA that turned in peak initial flow rates of 29.6 and 29.8 million cubic feet per day (Mmcf/d) of natural gas, which is 50% higher than previous Upper Marcellus wells drilled by Chessy. The company used 3,000 pounds of sand per foot in fracking the wells. On the down side, Chesapeake lost $41 million for the quarter after making $470 million in profit during the previous quarter. However, when compared with the same quarter last year (3Q16), losing $41M ain’t so bad. In 3Q16 Chesapeake lost $1.3 billion. The company’s stock price continues to be low, bumping along in the mid-$3 range ($3.66/share as of this morning when we checked). One odd statement from Lawler on the phone call. He said this: “I’m pleased to report our production has started to decline as forecasted following the previously announced weather-related operational delays experienced during the quarter.” He’s “pleased” production is down?! Yes, the company did previously forecast a drop in production–but how can you be “pleased” with that? Converting all hydrocarbons Chessy produces (natural gas, oil, condensate, NGLs) into barrels of oil per day, Chessy produced 542,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d) in 3Q17, versus producing 638,000 boe/d in 3Q16–a drop of 15%. Combining the Marcellus and Utica, Chessy produced 246,000 boe/d in 3Q17 versus producing 261,000 boe/d in 3Q16–down 5.7%. The company currently operates 14 drilling rigs across all plays–two of them in the Marcellus/Utica. Below is the full 3Q17 update, including financials, select portions of the analyst phone call, an updated slide deck, and analysis by Reuters…
In September 2016, Chesapeake Energy filed disclosure forms with the Securities and Exchange Commission which says the U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), a number of states, and even the U.S. Postal Service have served the company with subpoenas for information (see 
Antero Resources turned in their third quarter 2017 update earlier this week. On the ubiquitous analyst phone call, Antero CEO Paul Rady spoke at length about the company’s long laterals. Antero has been a leader in drilling long laterals with nearly 900 wells drilled at an average lateral length of 8,250 feet–with some 230 of those drilled with a lateral length longer than 10,000 feet. Of all the shale wells drilled in the Marcellus/Utica that are over 10,000 feet, Antero has drilled more than 30% of those wells. According to Rady: “Longer laterals at 9,000 plus feet generate materially higher well economics.” But long laterals aren’t the whole story. Antero is also bumping up the amount of sand they use in fracking. In 2016 they used 1,500 pounds per square foot. From there they moved to 1,875. Today? They use 2,500 pounds per foot. The company continues to be one of the best in the business with hedging, or pre-selling their gas on long-term contracts for prices higher than they would get on the day-to-day spot market. After hedging, Antero got $3.39 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf) for gas and equivalents (oil, NGLS) last quarter. Antero drilled and brought online 31 Marcellus wells and 6 Utica wells in 3Q17. Below is the full update, extracts from the analyst phone call, and the the latest slide deck…
Gulfport Energy, which has drilled the second-highest number of Utica wells in Ohio (331 so far, second only to Chesapeake Energy), issued their full third quarter 2017 update earlier this week. Gulfport, which drills mainly in the Utica (but also in Oklahoma and Louisiana), reported 3Q17 production was up an astonishing 63% over the same period last year, and up 16% from 2Q17. Gulfport produced an average of 1.2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of natural gas equivalent in 3Q17. The vast majority of that production (82% of it) came from the Ohio Utica. You can safely say Gulfport has broken into the 1 Bcf/d Club in the Ohio Utica! On the financial front, the company swung into profitability during 3Q17 by making $18.2 million in profit, versus losing $157.3 million in the same quarter last year. The company has four rigs operating in the Utica, and they drilled 23 Utica wells in 3Q17. Below is the full 3Q17 update, excerpts from the analyst call, and the latest slide deck…
In something of a good omen ahead of a vote on Nov. 9 by shareholders of EQT and Rice Energy to approve a merger, one of two EQT-shareholding corporate raiders, D.E. Shaw, supports the merger. In point of fact, Shaw has not opposed the merger since it was announced in June. Shaw’s “issue” has been that the merged EQT/Rice should immediately split itself in two–into upstream (drilling) and midstream (pipelines). Shaw’s pressure seems to be one of the (main?) reasons why EQT moved up the timing to consider such a split (see 
Normally when you read about a raucous crowd at a public meeting dealing with shale gas, it’s raucous because of misbehaving antis. This time the shoe is on the other foot. Huntley & Huntley has plans to drill four shale wells in Upper Burrell Township (Westmoreland County), PA. As MDN reported in June, a landowner in Upper Burrell filed an appeal against Upper Burrell’s zoning ordinance that allows drilling in rural, agricultural districts (see 
Monroeville, PA (Allegheny County, suburb of Pittsburgh) is hostile toward the shale industry and continues to display their hostility in court. In September, Monroeville Council voted to enact a super-restrictive seismic testing ordinance (see 
Yesterday CONSOL Energy issued its third quarter 2017 update, along with a date for when the company will split in two–a coal company and a natural gas drilling company. The date is Nov. 28th. As of that date the CONSOL Energy name will belong to the coal company, and CNX Resources will be the new name of the natgas drilling company. According to Nick DeIuliis, CEO of CONSOL today and future CEO of CNX Resources, “Going into year-end, not only will our businesses be separated, but our E&P operations will be growing substantially.” One of the ways they intend to grow is by adding a third drilling rig to the two currently operating. Right now CONSOL is operating a rig in Greene County, PA and another in Monroe County, OH. The original plan was to add a third rig in 2018, but they are “moving it forward some” and will add it this year–somewhere in southwestern PA. During 3Q17 CONSOL drilled 10 wells–six of them in the Marcellus in southwest PA, and four in the Ohio Utica. The company continues to have a flirtation with the Utica–in PA. They have a program to drill dry Utica wells in both Indiana and Greene counties. The company said they plan to bring two Utica wells online in Westmoreland County by the end of the year–close to the first Utica well they drilled two years ago. Production was up slightly in 3Q17, to 101 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe). By comparison, in 3Q16 CONSOL produced 96.4 Bcfe. Below is yesterday’s update, the current slide deck used on the analyst call, and excerpts from the analyst call…
Yesterday MDN received an email from subscriber Sandy R. who lives in southwestern PA. Her land is leased to Range Resources, and she recently read that Range “now has their own pipelines to carry Marcellus gas to better paying markets.” In our response to Sandy, we mentioned that although producers sometimes buy a share of a pipeline, they rarely own pipelines outright. More often they sign long-term (10-20 year) agreements with large midstream companies to reserve capacity along pipelines. We went looking for which pipelines Range might have reserved capacity on that are near where Sandy lives, and found two things that caught our attention. One is a recent statement from Range bragging (our word) about a strategy they put in place 10 years ago to get enough pipeline capacity to move Marcellus gas out of the region to better paying markets. The second thing is we located a list of major northeast pipeline projects with the pipelines Range has reserved capacity along highlighted in yellow. Cool! So below is an article mentioning some of the pipelines Range says will be a game-changer for them in the near-term, followed by that list of pipelines they have reserved capacity along…
An extensive article in the Pittsburgh Business Times calls attention to the developing shortage of qualified construction workers in southwest Pennsylvania. So far the need for workers has been met, but it’s not hard to predict that as Shell ramps up its “vertical construction” (building the buildings to house the cracker) this fall, that shortages will happen–not only for Shell’s project, but for other expansion projects in the area as well. Shell is the anchor. There are dozens (perhaps hundreds) of other businesses that will launch, relocate or expand to take advantage of Shell’s forthcoming supply of cheap plastics. All of those projects will create thousands of jobs in the construction industry. Various colleges and unions have launched training programs to meet the need for electricians, carpenters, iron workers, steamfitters, insulators and sheet metal workers. Question is, will it be enough?…