Allegheny County | Beaver County | Energy Companies | Ethane | Hancock County | Harrison County | Industrywide Issues | Jefferson County (OH) | Ohio | Pennsylvania | Pipelines | Regulation | Shell | Washington County | West Virginia
Shell’s Falcon Ethane Pipe Investigated for Possible Corrosion
In February 2020, Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) Secretary Pat McDonnell sent a letter to the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). McDonnell’s letter alleges Shell’s 97-mile, two-legged Falcon pipeline system that will carry ethane to the mighty Shell cracker plant now under construction in Beaver County, PA, “may have been constructed with defective corrosion coating protection.” It’s an explosive charge just coming to light now, more than a year later.
Read More “Shell’s Falcon Ethane Pipe Investigated for Possible Corrosion”
Williams, via its wholly-owned subsidiary Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line (Transco), has filed a lawsuit against Mountain Valley Pipeline (a competitor) over MVP’s plan to extend the pipeline an extra 75 miles from southern Virginia into North Carolina. Williams claims some of the land MVP wants to use under eminent domain crosses into Transco’s easements and building MVP so close to Transco may damage Transco’s pipeline and the cathodic anti-corrosion system that protects it.
A third Pennsylvania township, Clara Township in Potter County, is about to be lured onto the same litigation rocks by the siren song of the uber-radical Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) as two other towns, by adopting an illegal “home rule” law in an attempt to block a new wastewater injection well. CELDF lured two other towns onto the same litigation rocks, where they’ve crashed–Grant Township in Indiana County and Highland Township in Elk County. Both towns were sued by the state Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) when they tried to block injection wells using the same home rule tactic (see 
Earlier this week the Ohio Supreme Court expanded on one of its prior rulings concerning the Ohio Marketable Title Act (MTA) to try and make things a little bit clearer concerning previously severed mineral rights (severed from surface rights). What is at stake in the MTA is whether surface rights owners can regain possession of mineral rights by using the MTA–at least in some cases. Indeed they can, but certain rules must be obeyed.
OTHER U.S. REGIONS: Iowa House passes bill banning anti-natural gas, propane ordinances; NATIONAL: EIA expects crude oil prices to rise through April because of lower OPEC production; Understanding the volatile relationship between LNG and global gas markets; U.S. shale prioritizing debt over drilling, just as OPEC predicted; Oil and gas industry isn’t going away anytime soon; INTERNATIONAL: Russia: LNG action plan approved.