| | |

Another Short-Line Railroad Revived by Marcellus Shale Drilling

Chalk up the resurrection of another short-line railroad to drilling in the Marcellus Shale. As MDN previously reported, the Wellsboro & Corning Railroad tripled its cargo traffic in just a few short years from drillers who need carloads of sand. We now have word of a rail line brought back from the dead in Luzerne County, PA due to Marcellus drilling activity:

DURYEA – Investment spurred by Marcellus Shale natural gas exploration has transformed an antiquated, weed-ridden rail yard just north of Pittston into a state-of-the-art transloading terminal teeming with rail and trucking activity on an almost daily basis.

Over the last year, Reading & Northern Railroad Co. sunk $100,000 into Pittston Yard, laying new track to accommodate 100 new rail cars and constructing a facility to store and hold up to 800 cars of sand to be used in hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” operations at Marcellus Shale drill sites throughout Northeastern Pennsylvania, said Reading & Northern President Warren A. Michel.

“The reason for our success is that we are the largest facility in the region capable of handling hundreds of rail cars of sand. We now have 130 (sand) rail cars at the yard and we’ll be expanding substantially over the next six months,” Michel said.*

*Wilkes-Barre Times Leader (Mar 26) – Old Duryea railroad yard taking on new life

| | | | | |

Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin Runs Wall-to-Wall Coverage of Marcellus Drilling Debate

The Sunday, March 28 Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin (Broome County, NY) devoted a number of pages to the issue of drilling in the Marcellus Shale. The chief writer for the P&SB on these matters, Tom Wilbur, is anti-drilling, and it shows in his articles. As people on the anti-drilling side of the debate often do, they resort to unsubstantiated “facts” and vague nightmare scenarios. Today’s articles were no exception.

On the front page we have the following articles:

Marcellus Shale: Is it safe to drill?
An abridged (and mostly one-sided) history of the shale gas drilling debate in the Southern Tier region of New York and Northeastern PA. Wilbur identifies some of the issues being debated, with the obligatory mention of Dimock, PA and the the isolated (only?) case of a driller who didn’t follow procedure and methane (not chemicals, but natural gas) migrated into drinking water supplies for 12 families. Dimock is the rallying cry for many who oppose drilling. He ends the article with the vague threat that anti-drillers will tie up the right to drill with legal harassment for as long as they possibly can. I believe him on that one.

Landowners face fight over NYC watershed
Politicians in New York City are making political hay out of the prospect of drilling with statements that drilling anywhere in the Catskill watershed area must be prevented at all costs because if the water supply for NYC is contaminated, they would have to install filters costing into the billions. The politicians from NYC want horizontal drilling banned in New York State as a preventative measure. And they’re threatening to tie up drilling with lawsuits. No one wants to pollute the City’s water supply! And no one will. What’s conveniently left out of the story by Wilbur is the fact that there is only one company, Chesapeake Energy, with any leases signed in the watershed, and that’s for 5,000 acres. Oh, and Chesapeake voluntarily said they would not drill in the watershed.

Read More “Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin Runs Wall-to-Wall Coverage of Marcellus Drilling Debate”

| | | | |

Binghamton Natural Gas Summit: Millennium Pipeline President Richard Leehr

richard-leehr-millennium One of the speakers at the Natural Gas Development Summit held in Binghamton on March 18th was Richard Leehr, president of Millennium Pipeline (MP), a major natural gas pipeline running from Western New York State almost to New York City. What follows are MDN’s notes from his presentation. Unfortunately Millennium has a policy against sharing their PowerPoint slides on the web (we asked and were turned down). It’s unfortunate because there were a number of good slides that would be of interest to landowners. However, MDN located two PDF maps showing the MP and its interconnect points with other pipelines, and a pipeline system map for Upstate New York and the Northern Tier of Pennsylvania (see bottom of this post for the links).

Dick Leehr started his presentation with a “thank you” to landowners for their patience and inconvenience during the recent construction of the pipeline. The MP has its home office in Pearl River, NY, almost on the border with New Jersey and not far from metro New York City. The MP is an underground steel 30-inch diameter pipeline with 1 inch thick walls. The steel is coated and should last at least 100 years.

The MP has the capacity to move 1/2 BCF (billion cubic feet) of natural gas over the entire length of the pipeline per day. On January 4th, the MP hit its current high in delivery with 714,000 dekatherms.

Mr. Leehr said to think of pipelines as Interstate Highways. Shippers contract or “reserve” capacity on the pipeline. The pipeline picks gas up at one point and delivers it to a different point specified by the customer. Pipelines are among the safest forms of energy transportation in the country according to Leehr.

Read More “Binghamton Natural Gas Summit: Millennium Pipeline President Richard Leehr”

| | | | |

SRBC Fines Southwestern Energy $50K for Lack of Proper Approvals

Although the details are somewhat slim in the newspaper account, the known facts are that Southwestern Energy started construction on a well conductor pipe at a site in Wyalusing Township (Bradford County, PA) in early January, before the Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) had given its approval for said construction—something required by law. So the SRBC slapped them with a fine:

Under a settlement agreement between Southwestern and the commission, which was approved by both sides, Southwestern was required to make a $50,000 “payment in lieu of a penalty” to the commission.*

MDN firmly believes drilling companies need to be responsible and follow the rules, especially since the issue of drilling has been so distorted by anti-drilling propaganda. On the other hand, was this just an oversight on Southwestern’s part? Did someone not get the paperwork filed properly? Who knows. It does seem to be a case of “Simon Says” or “Mother May I?” Since the SRBC didn’t give the go-ahead, Southwestern was fined. Now that the paperwork is filed, have they gone ahead with construction at the site? Did the SRBC find any problems with the application once it was reviewed?

So, is SRBC’s action vigilant oversight of the public interest? Or a shakedown? You decide.

*Towanda Daily Review (Mar 24) – Southwestern Energy fined $50,000 for violation in Wyalusing Township

| | |

Lackawanna College, PA College of Technology Offer Programs to Train Marcellus-Related Workers

Colleges in Pennsylvania are adding programs to train workers for Marcellus Shale jobs. And a lot of workers will be required. MDN wrote about the presentation by Larry Michael (Pennsylvania College of Technology, PCT) and James Ladlee (Penn State Cooperative Extension) at the Binghamton Natural Gas Development Summit and their study that says every well drilled translates into 12 full-time jobs. Larry and James helped establish the Marcellus Shale Education & Training Center at PCT in Williamsport, where they are training students for a variety of careers:

Careers include welders, construction workers, drivers and machine operators and fabricators.Tracy Brundage, [PCT’s] managing director of the Workforce Development and Continuing Education programs, said that as the landscape of the Northern Tier changes, so too do course offerings at the college.

She said input from energy companies has been influential in the design of 21 new courses.*

In Scranton, Lackawanna College established an applied science degree in Oil and Gas Production Technology program in December 2008.

To prepare potential employees for [Marcellus-related gas] jobs, Lackawanna College offers an associate’s degree in natural gas technology and is developing an operating and maintenance degree program in compression technology that could debut next fall.

In addition, the college will soon start giving accounting students at its Towanda Center the option of customizing their degree to prepare them to work in the accounting side of the natural gas industry.

Last week, Chesapeake Energy donated $50,000 to help Lackawanna College expand its Natural Gas Technology Program at its New Milford Center campus in Susquehanna County. The college plans to use the money for capital-equipment costs in fitting out their new facilities for the program that began last fall.*

As drilling in the Marcellus Shale continues to expand in Pennsylvania (and when it finally begins in New York), many thousands of new jobs will need to be filled by local people. And those people will need to be trained. Forward-thinking colleges and technical schools are expanding now to meet the demand.

*Wilkes-Barre Times Leader (Mar 24) – Some colleges add programs to train workers

| | | | | |

Three Upstate Landowners on New York City Public Radio Discuss Drilling in the Marcellus

An interesting radio segment from WNYC Public Radio. Leonard Lopate conducted an interview with three Upstate landowners. From the program description:

We’ll look into the controversy over drilling for natural gas in Marcellus shale in Upstate New York, and discuss the challenges landowners face when deciding whether to lease their land to gas companies, the role of landowners coalitions, and how public officials are managing the drilling already occurring in their towns. We’ll speak with Mark Dunau, organic farmer from Delaware County; Jim Bays, Supervisor of the Town of Smyrna, in Chenango County; and Abby Tamber, steering committee member of the Central New York Landowners Coalition.*

While Mr. Dunau is clearly anti-drilling and Mr. Bays is somewhat anti-drilling, Ms. Tamber does a good job of representing local landowner groups and the concerns of landowners. The questions by the host are pretty good, and as far as public radio goes, this is about as fair and balanced as it gets. Overall, a B+ from MDN. Worth listening to as it does discuss some very important issues for landowners. Embedded player below—give it a listen! The segment is 34 minutes in length.

*WNYC (Mar 23) – The Lenoard Lopate Show

| | |

EPA Director of Drinking Water Protection says States are “Doing a Good Job Already” Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing

Brad Gill, executive director of the Independent Oil & Gas Association of New York, recently responded to an article in The Buffalo News supporting regulation of hydraulic fracturing by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Marcellus Drilling News considers the EPA proposal way out of line and a federal power grab that is unwarranted and illegal. Seems that Mr. Gill thinks so too. From his letter to the editor:

All processes related to natural gas exploration and extraction are regulated by the states which, because of their vast geological differences, can do a more thorough job. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency would never be able to regulate these processes efficiently or cost-effectively. In fact, Steve Heare, director of EPA’s drinking water protection office, recently said states are “doing a good job already” regulating hydraulic fracturing, adding that there is no evidence that suggests the process contaminates water.*

Be sure to click through and read the rest of the letter. Great summary of why hydraulic fracturing is safe, and why drilling should move forward now.

*The Buffalo News (Mar 22) – Brad Gill: Hydraulic fracturing issues are already answered

| | | | |

Binghamton Natural Gas Summit: How Many Jobs Does Drilling (Really) Create?

Marcellus Shale Workforce Needs Assessment Beyond random speculation, is there really any way to know, scientifically and accurately, just how many drilling-related jobs are being created in the Marcellus Shale? Yes there is! And two of the speakers at the Natural Gas Development Summit held in Binghamton on March 18th at the Regency Hotel, who have extensively studied the issue, laid out their findings for the assembled group.

The speakers were Larry Michael, Executive Director for Workforce & Economic Development with the Pennsylvania College of Technology (PCT), and James Ladlee, County Extension Director with Penn State Cooperative Extension. Both have put in a great deal of time studying the jobs issue. Larry Michael spent six months on the Marcellus Shale jobs issue as a contributing author of PCT’s Marcellus Shale Workforce Needs Assessment study.

What follows are MDN’s notes on this informative session. But we won’t make you read to the end for an answer. According to Messrs. Michael and Ladlee’s findings, every well drilled in the Marcellus Shale generates the equivalent of 12 full-time jobs, in perpetuity—for at least 20 years, as long as the well is active. The slightly longer explanation is, there are many people who work for varying periods of time on a well project, but if you add all of their time together, it would work out to 12 people full-time, ongoing, working directly or indirectly on the well project.

Read More “Binghamton Natural Gas Summit: How Many Jobs Does Drilling (Really) Create?”

| | |

Sullivan County, NY Legislature Wants to Ban Marcellus Drilling for Everyone in the County

Sullivan County, NY landowners have some reason to be concerned. Their county legislature wants a complete moratorium of horizontal gas drilling in the county.

At a recent meeting, the Sullivan County legislature voted to prevent drilling on county-owned lands. Frankly, “So what?” A ban on county-owned land likely does not make a difference for local landowners still interested in leasing. However, according to news reports:

“They [the county legislature] want the whole of Sullivan County off limits, via a moratorium.”*

That is a concern to Sullivan County landowners. It’s likely no more than huff and bluff, however, because New York has “home rule,” meaning if the State allows drilling, and local towns allow it, the county cannot supersede and disallow it.

Some Sullivan County land is considered part of the New York City watershed area—where the City gets its drinking water from. That complicates matters too.

MDN will keep an eye on the developing situation in Sullivan County when drilling finally begins in New York State.

*Mid-Hudson News Network (Mar 19) – Sullivan legislators say ‘no’ to hydrofracking, on county land

| | |

Marcellus Driller Funds Water Monitoring Program in Susquehanna River Basin

As Marcellus Drilling News previously noted, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission is in the process of placing 30 monitoring devices to track the effects of Marcellus drilling wastewater that enters area waterways. We now learn the program is being funded by the drilling industry itself:

The commission used a $750,000 grant from natural gas company East Resources Inc. to start the monitoring system. The monitoring stations provide data on factors such as temperature, pH level, depth and clarity. That information is available immediately on the commission’s Web site, and the state Department of Environmental Protection is notified if any problems are found.*

Kudos to East Resources for contributing a significant sum of money to help alleviate concerns that drilling is harming our waterways.

*State College Centre Daily Times, via WaterWorld (Mar 19) – System monitors water quality

| | | |

Hearing to Determine if PA Public Utility Commission has Right to Regulate Private Pipelines

The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) will hold a hearing on April 22 in Harrisburg, PA to discuss a particularly thorny issue: Does the PUC have the jurisdiction to regulate private pipelines?

The PUC has the responsibility of regulating pipelines that conduct oil or gas for compensation. That is, a pipeline owner leases space in the pipeline to third parties. In those cases, the law is clear. But what if an energy company builds and maintains its own pipeline and only conducts its own gas through that pipeline? The law is not clear on that matter. Hence the hearing.

Jennifer Kocher, PUC spokeswoman, said the PUC has regulatory jurisdiction over “public utility pipelines,” defined as pipelines transporting gas or oil within the state for compensation.

“But if a drilling company uses its own pipelines to transport the gas it produces, then there’s a question about our jurisdiction,” Ms. Kocher said. “We’re looking at that issue, at our safety jurisdiction, safety issues and the role of the PUC.”

Matt Benson, a spokesman for the Pennsylvania Oil and Gas Association, said the industry trade group hasn’t addressed the pipeline regulation issue and is taking a “wait and see position” on PUC regulation. He said the group, along with gas producers, hopes to be offered an opportunity to testify at the hearing.*

*Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Mar 18) – PUC sets hearing on Marcellus shale pipes

| | |

PA Marcellus Shale Coalition Responds to EPA Plan to “Study” Hydraulic Fracturing

The following is a press release issued by the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Coalition in response to the rogue EPA’s announcement that they will study hydraulic fracturing (again):

The Marcellus Shale Coalition today issued the following statement regarding a plan by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to study hydraulic fracturing:

“The members of the Marcellus Shale Coalition develop and drill wells in an environmentally responsible manner, including the use of hydraulic fracturing to complete a well for production. Hydraulic fracturing has been an established and proven practice for 60 years in Pennsylvania and around the country, and has been regulated successfully by state agencies. There have been no identified groundwater contamination incidents due to hydraulic fracturing, as noted by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, other state regulators and the U.S. Groundwater Protection Council.

“Similarly, there have not been impacts to surface water sources due to the practice. Water withdrawals in Pennsylvania are highly regulated by state agencies and water commissions, with a typical permitted withdrawal amounting to about one-half of one percent of the average flow of a stream or river.

“The MSC will provide information and participate as appropriate in EPA’s study. Our industry is confident that an objective evaluation of hydraulic fracturing will reach the same conclusion as other studies – that it is a safe and well-regulated process that is essential to the development of natural gas.”*

*PA Marcellus Shale Coalition (Mar 18) – MSC Statement on EPA Study of Hydraulic Fracturing

| | | | |

Encana Holds Leases for 25K Acres in Luzerne County, Claims Every Well Drilled Creates 120 Jobs

An article in the Wilkes-Barre Times Leader reveals this interesting information about Encana’s activity in Pennsylvania:

Encana Oil and Gas Inc. – has leased 25,000 acres of property in Luzerne County. The land is mainly on the north side of Route 118 in Fairmount, Ross, Lake and Lehman townships.

Encana so far has obtained permits for drilling one well in Lake Township and another in Fairmount Township and is seeking a permit for one in Lehman Township, said company spokesman Doug Hock. Hydrogeological studies are now under way, and officials hope to begin constructing wells by May.

“For every well drilled, that creates about 120 jobs, either directly or indirectly…  The bulk of these jobs as we begin operations are done by subcontractors,” Hock said.*

*Wilkes-Barre Times Leader (Mar 21) – Law, engineering firms will be the first for jobs

| | |

Marcellus Shale Drilling – Revival for Short-Line Railroads?

You can add short-line railroads to the list of businesses that benefit from drilling in the Marcellus Shale. And it’s all because of sand. Drillers like to use a special kind of sand found in the Midwest. They need railroad cars full of the stuff when drilling. The sand aids in the process of opening or “fracking” horizontally drilled wells. And lots of sand means drillers need a way to get it to the drill site. Enter short-line railroads.

Two years ago Tom Myles purchased the 35-mile Wellsboro & Corning Railroad, not knowing that a drilling boom would be a boom for his company.

In the two years since Myles took over the Wellsboro & Corning line, cargo traffic has nearly tripled, to 849 railcars last year, the most in its modern history. In a recession, Myles has hired 10 people to transfer sand from the cars into trucks.

He anticipates that business will nearly double this year, to 1,600 railcars. Almost all of that is sand used in hydraulic fracturing, the process that shatters the dense Marcellus Shale under high pressure to unlock its stores of natural gas.

“We sold $40 million of sand last year,” O’Neill said. “This is now our primary business.”*

*The Philadelphia Inquirer (Mar 21) – Marcellus Shale sends short-line railroad booming

| |

Rogue EPA Takes a Second Run at Regulating Hydraulic Fracturing

Here we go again. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today they would once again study hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) as a mining method to extract natural gas. The EPA already spent considerable time and expense in 2004 to study it and found no evidence that fracking threatens drinking water. But Democrats in Congress, led by Congressman Maurice Hinchey (Democrat from Upstate New York), now have control of the EPA and they want a new study. Their claim is that the original study was “flawed” and unduly influenced by then Vice President Dick Cheney.

The EPA is upset that Congress passed a law in 2005 that prevents them from regulating fracking. And the EPA now has a sympathetic ear in Congress, so they’re trying once again to grab hold of an entire industry not within their jurisdiction or charter to regulate. This is their back door way of doing it.

On the matter of fracking and safety, an ABC News article about the EPA announcement today says:

Arthur E. Berman, a Houston-based petroleum geologist who’s questioned the headlong rush to open up shale fields on economic grounds, said the environmental risks have been overblown.

“We have been doing hydraulic fracturing for 50, 60 years and there is no evidence whatsoever that there has been ground or surface water contamination,” he said.

He said only “point-5 percent” of what goes into a well were chemicals, and those were mostly “common chemicals that you would put in your swimming pool or hot tub, something like chlorine.”*

The EPA is spending $1.9 million on the study, and expects to complete it in 2012. MDN sincerely hopes a likely change in the balance of power in Congress after November 2010 will mean a Congress willing to keep a rogue EPA in check.

*ABC News (Mar 18) – EPA to Study ‘Fracking’ Gas Drilling Method

| | |

Binghamton Natural Gas Summit: Opening Remarks and Scene-Setting with Scott Kurkoski

Scott Kurkoski Marcellus Drilling News attended the Natural Gas Development Summit held in Binghamton on March 18th at the Regency Hotel. The event was organized and sponsored by the Joint Landowners Coalition of New York. There were about 150 people in the audience, made up of landowners, people from the drilling industry (lawyers, energy companies, engineering companies and others), and the press. It was a half day event, starting at 9:30 am and ending at 12:45 pm. MDN will run a series of posts to cover the presentations. This article contains the opening remarks delivered by Scott Kurkoski, a lawyer specializing in mineral rights with Levene, Gouldin & Thompson. Scott was one of the chief organizers of the event and master of ceremonies.

He opened by stating the purpose of the meeting is to have a discussion about the issues, with an aim to move the issue of drilling in New York State forward. He thanked Broome County Executive Barbara Fiala for hosting the event and for her efforts on behalf of landowners.

Scott next provided the background for where we are now in New York, and how we got here. In 1992, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation created a Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) to govern oil and gas drilling in New York. Since then, newer technologies (horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing or “fracing”) have come along and the DEC, under direction from the Governor’s office, drafted Supplemental (new) regulations to account for these new technologies and their use.

Read More “Binghamton Natural Gas Summit: Opening Remarks and Scene-Setting with Scott Kurkoski”