PA Congressman Rips EPA over “War on Coal” at Pittsburgh Hearing
Pennsylvania Congressman Tim Murphy delivered a sterling statement at a field hearing held by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Pittsburgh last Friday. The EPA is doing a road show to take comments on their new, very restrictive regulations that are part of so-called climate change regulations (how stupid is it that we say the climate changes–of course it does!). Murphy’s comments address the Obama EPA’s war on coal. That what he calls it, that’s what everyone (but Obama and the EPA) calls it. We bring you his testimony before the EPA because (a) it takes aim at an out-of-control EPA, an issue near and dear to our hearts for lo these many years, and (b) because the EPA won’t stop with coal. They’re coming for natural gas next, after they’ve eliminated coal from the picture. You can bank on it…
Read More “PA Congressman Rips EPA over “War on Coal” at Pittsburgh Hearing”
Washington & Jefferson College, located in Washington, PA (Pittsburgh suburb) has a Center for Energy Policy & Management–which makes sense since Washington County, PA sits in the middle of the wet gas Marcellus drilling zone. W&J recently teamed up with the Washington, DC-based Environmental Law Institute (ELI) to study the “boom and bust” cycle that communities face with resource extraction like the Marcellus Shale. The thought was to produce a document–in this case a series of documents–that can guide local and state politicians as they plan for the future. How can, and even *can* a community avoid a “bust” after a huge boom? That’s what the documents aim to answer. The only problem is, the ELI seems to tilt anti-drilling, and the entire study was funded by Mamma Teresa Heinz-Kerry and her Heinz Endowments–a strongly anti-drilling organization. So you know where this is headed…
Two “independent” administrative law judges for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission have dealt what could be a major blow to Sunoco Logistics’ request to have the Mariner East NGL (natural gas liquids) pipeline declared a public utility. The two judges–David Salapa and Elizabeth Barnes–handed down a decision yesterday that denies Sunoco’s request to have 18 pump and 17 value stations (in 31 locations) that would need to be built along the 300+ mile pipeline exempt from local zoning ordinances. If the pipeline is considered a public utility it would be exempt from local ordinances. Without that exemption, Sunoco Logistics faces a nearly impossible task of trying to gain permission to build the necessary new stations. Below is a copy of the decision, and MDN’s background on this important pipeline project, along with a “where do we go from here” analysis…
Yesterday MDN wrote a summary and interpretation of an article appearing in the Harrisburg Patriot-News about the recent court decision known as EQT Production v. Opatkiewicz, et al (see