NYT, Boston Globe Delve into Russian Gas Coming to America
The more we read about and dig into the story of Russian gas coming to Boston, the angrier we get. Just yesterday we told you that a rumored second shipment of Russian gas may be heading to Boston (see 2nd LNG Tanker with Russian Gas Coming to Boston?!). We have more details about the story. According to a New York Times article, in 2014 then-President Obama slapped sanctions on the “financiers and producers of Russian oil and natural gas, not the output.” Russia, at that time and since, has tried to “destabilize eastern Ukraine” with an ongoing occupation of Crimea. Sanctions against the financial services and energy sectors followed. Vladimir Putin (one of his cronies) was building an LNG export plant in the Arctic–Yamal LNG. The sanctions were aimed at stopping the plant from getting built–but it got built anyway with the help of Chinese banks. Yamal’s very first shipment of LNG recently left the facility and (as we previously outlined) was offloaded for a couple of days in the UK (see Confirmed: LNG Coming to Boston on Jan 22 is Illegal Russian Gas). What we still don’t understand is this: How can you impose sanctions on the financers and producers, but not on the outcome, the production (gas) itself? That seems crazy. We still think the gas is illegal–but nobody in D.C. (wake up Trump Administration!) is doing anything to stop it. Regardless of whether or not the shipments are illegal, even the far-left libs at the Boston Globe think this is nuts. It is humiliating (and an outrage) that sanctioned Russian gas–the VERY FIRST SHIPLOAD–is now being unloaded in Boston Harbor…
Read More “NYT, Boston Globe Delve into Russian Gas Coming to America”

The “best of the rest”–stories that caught MDN’s eye over the break that you may be interested in reading. In today’s lineup: Westmoreland transit growing fleet of natgas buses; Warren County discusses distribution of Act 13 funds; Washington State looks to ban fracking for 10 years; FERC faces complications with new Trump tax cut; why is shale still not profitable; Sierra Club finally drops opposition to Sabine Pass LNG exports; fracked horizontal wells vast majority of new wells drilled; battling weather models; Canadian battle for U.S. gas markets; and more!

As predicated, a co-tenancy bill has been introduced in this year’s 60-day session of the West Virginia legislature (see
In another MDN post today, we do a deep dive into West Virginia House Bill (HB) 4268, the “Co-tenancy Modernization and Majority Protection Act” (see WV Co-Tenancy, Royalty Transparency Bills Make Progress). One of the organizations closely watching the progress of that bill is the WV Farm Bureau, which lobbies for the best interests of mineral owners, farmers and rural residents. What does the Farm Bureau think of the bill so far? Last week, on the very day HB 4268 was introduced, Farm Bureau director of Governmental Affairs, Dwayne O’Dell, penned an editorial in which he lends tepid support for the bill, IF there are protections built in for landowners. O’Dell begins his editorial by stating he’s worried that WV legislators are, “allowing oil and gas developers to take private property rights unfettered.” That is, they are literally “giving away the farm.” O’Dell is favor of “providing oil and gas companies with a reasonable platform to succeed.” But not at the expense of his members. Here’s a big, fat caution flag being waved by the WV Farm Bureau with respect to the co-tenancy bill, along with a call for the legislature to revisit the issue of “at the well head” pricing…
Earlier this month MDN told you about a new shale wastewater treatment facility planned for Coudersport, in Potter County, PA (see 
Earlier this month MDN brought you news that Dominion’s Cove Point LNG export facility along the shore of Maryland has delayed its official start-up until perhaps as late as April (see
Pennsylvania state officials estimate there are as many as 200,000 abandoned (i.e. “orphan”) oil and gas wells in the state–the vast majority of them conventional wells drilled over 50 years ago. Most of them are not mapped or known. Some of them are hazards for shale drillers who stumble across them when drilling new wells. If you drill horizontally and clip an old/abandoned well, it becomes like an elevator pumping fluids and gas to the surface. Not good. Everyone is committed to finding and marking and capping these old wells–the question is, how do you pay for it? In PA, it’s an ongoing hot potato of who will pay (see
How often do we have to repeat the warning that electrical blackouts are coming to New England if the region does not get new sources of natural gas by building more pipelines? This is not some reckless, wild eyed blogger guy saying it–the warning comes from the top, from the people who operate the electric grid! We first raised the warning back in 2014 (see
As part of the Pennsylvania Senate’s misguided and mangled budget bill last year, Republicans managed to slip in fixes to the state Dept. of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) chronic delays in issuing permits related to shale drilling (see 

In December MDN told you about a small-but-growing brewery in Canton, OH started by shale co-workers who had “a passion for easy drinking brews” (see