Will PA’s Marcellus Miracle be Snuffed Out by a Severance Tax?
Every now again you need to step back and consider the big picture when it comes to the miracle of fracking and horizontal drilling. Pennsylvania has seen an economic revolution from the Marcellus Shale industry. That revolution is in danger of being snuffed out by Democrats like gubernatorial candidate Tom Wolf who, if elected, promises to implement a Marcellus-killing severance tax. And no, this is not wild speculation. If you look at recent history, such a scenario is supported by the evidence. David Spigelmyer, president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, penned an op-ed piece that ran in the Philadelphia Inquirer yesterday to “set the record straight” on just what the Marcellus industry has meant in PA and what a severance tax would do to the industry in that state should it be implemented…
Read More “Will PA’s Marcellus Miracle be Snuffed Out by a Severance Tax?”
Washington & Jefferson College, located in Washington, PA (Pittsburgh suburb) has a Center for Energy Policy & Management–which makes sense since Washington County, PA sits in the middle of the wet gas Marcellus drilling zone. W&J recently teamed up with the Washington, DC-based Environmental Law Institute (ELI) to study the “boom and bust” cycle that communities face with resource extraction like the Marcellus Shale. The thought was to produce a document–in this case a series of documents–that can guide local and state politicians as they plan for the future. How can, and even *can* a community avoid a “bust” after a huge boom? That’s what the documents aim to answer. The only problem is, the ELI seems to tilt anti-drilling, and the entire study was funded by Mamma Teresa Heinz-Kerry and her Heinz Endowments–a strongly anti-drilling organization. So you know where this is headed…
Two “independent” administrative law judges for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission have dealt what could be a major blow to Sunoco Logistics’ request to have the Mariner East NGL (natural gas liquids) pipeline declared a public utility. The two judges–David Salapa and Elizabeth Barnes–handed down a decision yesterday that denies Sunoco’s request to have 18 pump and 17 value stations (in 31 locations) that would need to be built along the 300+ mile pipeline exempt from local zoning ordinances. If the pipeline is considered a public utility it would be exempt from local ordinances. Without that exemption, Sunoco Logistics faces a nearly impossible task of trying to gain permission to build the necessary new stations. Below is a copy of the decision, and MDN’s background on this important pipeline project, along with a “where do we go from here” analysis…
Yesterday MDN wrote a summary and interpretation of an article appearing in the Harrisburg Patriot-News about the recent court decision known as EQT Production v. Opatkiewicz, et al (see