Skip to content
Marcellus Drilling News
Account Login
  • Home
  • About
  • Article Index
  • Calendar
  • Advertising
  • User Guide
  • SUBSCRIBE
Marcellus Drilling News
  • About MDN

    Merry Christmas – MDN Off Until Monday

    December 24, 2014December 24, 2014

    Merry ChristmasWe sincerely wish our readers a Merry Christmas! Thank you for your support (moral and financial). We will take the next two days off and be right back on Monday, Dec. 29 to catch you up on all of the latest Marcellus and Utica Shale news. Now go have some eggnog!

  • Chesapeake Energy | Energy Companies | Equinor/Statoil | Pennsylvania | Southwestern Energy | Statewide PA | Statewide WV | West Virginia

    Statoil Reduces Marcellus Holdings in $394M Deal with Southwestern

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    follow the bouncing ballTime to follow the bouncing ball–this is a tad complicated, but we’ll do our best to explain it. In 2008, Chesapeake Energy (under then-CEO Aubrey McClendon) took on a “silent” investing partner for 600,000 net acres in the Marcellus of West Virginia and southwest Pennsylvania. The non-operating partner for the acreage was Norwegian company Statoil, with a 32.5% interest in the acreage. Statoil put up buckets of money and Chessy did the drilling. Fast forward to October of this year. Chesapeake cut a deal to sell most of that acreage–some 413,000 acres with 435 drilled wells (see Chesapeake Sells Close to 25% of Marcellus/Utica Operation). The buyer is Southwestern Energy. In order for the deal to close, Statoil has to sign on. Today, Statoil announced they have cut a deal with Southwestern to reduce Statoil’s now 29% interest in the acreage down to a 23% interest, in return for a $394 million check from Southwestern…
    Read More “Statoil Reduces Marcellus Holdings in $394M Deal with Southwestern”

  • Energy Companies | Harrison County | Industrywide Issues | Marion County | Regulation | Upshur County | West Virginia | XTO

    XTO Paying $5.3M for Violating Federal Clean Water Act in WV

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    Mother May IPushing dirt around on drill pads can get very expensive if you don’t have a signed piece of paper in your hand that says, “Mother May I?” XTO Energy, the shale-drilling subsidiary of ExxonMobil, has just learned that the hard way. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) along with the U.S. Dept. of Justice announced a settlement yesterday with XTO–fining the company $2.3 million because “fill material” (i.e. dirt and rocks) got into nearby streams and swamps in several West Virginia counties when XTO pushed that dirt and rocks around to construct roads and well pads. Oh, and XTO has to “undo” the damage, spending another $3 million or so. Total price tag of $5.3 million for violating the “Mother May I?” Clean Water Act. If XTO had had the proper paperwork, they wouldn’t have been fined. The jack boots of the feds come down again…
    Read More “XTO Paying $5.3M for Violating Federal Clean Water Act in WV”

  • Accidents | Energy Companies | Greene County (PA) | Industrywide Issues | Pennsylvania | Regulation | Vantage Energy

    Vantage Energy Fined $1M for Multiple Errors at Greene County Site

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    The Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection has just slapped Vantage Energy with a $1 million fine for “more than a dozen violations of environmental regulations stemming from a landslide and illegal waste disposal at their Porter Street well pad in Franklin Township, Greene County, earlier this year.” The landslide at the well pad covered over portions of two nearby creeks. Then, to add insult to injury, about six months later two truckloads of frack wastewater got dumped on the landslide area being repaired. The wastewater ended up in the streams. But wait, there’s more! Vantage constructed a new access road next to the streams adversely affected–but Vantage didn’t have a permit to construct the road. Oy vey! Did they do anything right? According to the DEP, Vantage, “to its credit,” is making improvements in their procedures to prevent a future comedy of errors…
    Read More “Vantage Energy Fined $1M for Multiple Errors at Greene County Site”

  • Energy Services | Industrywide Issues | Kinder Morgan | Pennsylvania | Pike County | Potter County | Regulation | Susquehanna County | Tennessee Gas Pipeline | Wayne County

    Tenn. Gas Pipeline Fined $800K for Violations, Illegal Dump Sites

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    Seems that the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) has been busy clearing up outstanding cases of violations by both drillers and pipeline companies. In addition to a stiff $1 million fine against Vantage Energy yesterday (see our companion story), the DEP fined the Tennessee Gas Pipeline (TGP) $800,000 for violations in four different counties during pipeline construction for the 300 Line Project. TGP will pay a penalty of $210,000 and will fund a $540,000 clean-up program of illegal dumpsites in Pike, Potter, Susquehanna and Wayne counties. The details…
    Read More “Tenn. Gas Pipeline Fined $800K for Violations, Illegal Dump Sites”

  • Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | Litigation | New York | Regulation | Statewide NY

    Do “Takings” Lawsuits Stand a Chance for NY Landowners?

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    Last week MDN posed the question, In Light of NY Frack Ban, What Happens to Signed Leases? In that article, we also began to address the topic of lawsuits based on “takings”–the fact that New York has stripped away the right of a landowner to profit and use his or her land as he or she sees fit–including fracking under it–and those landowners are owed just compensation. Today we pick up that thread. What recourse do New York landowners have at this juncture, and what actions can they take next? Would a takings lawsuit have a prayer of a chance?…
    Read More “Do “Takings” Lawsuits Stand a Chance for NY Landowners?”

  • Chesapeake Energy | Energy Companies | Southwestern Energy

    Chesapeake Using $1B from Southwestern Deal to Buy Back Stock

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    A press release issued yesterday by Chesapeake Energy caught our interest. Chessy announced the closing of the deal we first announced back in October–a deal to sell some 413,000 Marcellus/Utica acres plus 435 already-drilled wells on that acreage to Southwestern Energy for $5.375 billion (see Chesapeake Sells Close to 25% of Marcellus/Utica Operation). Yesterday’s announcement says the deal is now done (see our related story today about Southwestern and Statoil), and that Chessy will use some of that money to buy back $1 billion worth of common stock, an effort to boost the company’s stock price. What’s interesting to us, aside from trying to make Carl Icahn’s stocks worth more, is how the details of the deal with Southwestern changed from October to now…
    Read More “Chesapeake Using $1B from Southwestern Deal to Buy Back Stock”

  • Energy Companies | Hinto Energy | Ohio | Statewide OH | Utica Shale

    Potential New OH Utica Driller First Drills Conventional Oil Well

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    A very small independent oil and gas company headquartered in Denver, CO, Hinto Energy (market cap of $5.4 million), issued a press release today to say they’ve drilled a shallow, conventional oil well in the Berea Sandstone of Ohio. A conventional driller targeting shallow rock layers is typically not something that catches our attention. The thing that does catch our attention is that Hinto is also eyeing other rock layers for the leases they own in Ohio–including the Utica Shale. Hinto has not previously drilled any horizontal shale wells, from what we can tell. It appears they didn’t even drill this conventional Ohio Berea well as their announcement states they will maintain a “75% non-operated interest” (i.e. ownership) in the well. Non-operated means they didn’t do the drilling. While this isn’t big news by any stretch, it is notable that yet another E&P is sniffing around the Ohio Utica…
    Read More “Potential New OH Utica Driller First Drills Conventional Oil Well”

  • Energy Services | Industrywide Issues | Lycoming County | Pennsylvania | Pipelines | Regulation | Snyder County | UGI Energy Services

    UGI Pre-Files with FERC for New Marcellus Pipeline in Central PA

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    Another new pipeline on the way from Pennsylvania utility company UGI. This one will run from Lycoming County in north-central PA to Snyder County in central PA and bring abundant, cheap, clean-burning Marcellus Shale gas from NEPA to a site where a company is converting a former coal-burning electric generating plant into a natural gas electric plant, near the Shamokin Dam in Snyder County. UGI has submitted a pre-filing request to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the 35-mile pipeline–a project that will cost $150 million to build. Starting next month UGI will conduct an open season to sign up more customers for cheap Marcellus Shale gas. Here’s the details…
    Read More “UGI Pre-Files with FERC for New Marcellus Pipeline in Central PA”

  • Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | Maryland | New York | Regulation | Statewide MD | Statewide NY

    Why Did Maryland Decide to Allow Fracking but New York Didn’t?

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    How could two liberal, eastern states review the science of fracking and make opposite decisions about whether or not to proceed? That question has been rolling around our heads since last week. MDN even mentioned it in passing–that just a few weeks ago outgoing liberal Democrat Gov. Martin O’Malley (Maryland) has given fracking the green light in his state (see Maryland Gets Ready to Frack! Gov O’Malley Files New Regulations). But last week, liberal Democrat Gov. Andrew Cuomo (New York) put the brakes on fracking in his state (see After 6+ Years, Andrew Cuomo Bans Fracking in New York). Two different states, same “science” reviewed–why the difference? A (surprisingly) well-written article in the Washington Post tackles and answers that question…
    Read More “Why Did Maryland Decide to Allow Fracking but New York Didn’t?”

  • Anti-Drilling/Fossil Fuel | Energy Services | Industrywide Issues | Lancaster County | Pennsylvania | Pipelines | Williams

    Lancaster Congressional Staffer Calls Anti-Pipeliners – Big Mistake

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    Some anti-drilling, anti-pipeline folks who live in Lancaster County, PA complained to their Congressman, U.S. Rep. Joe Pitts, about the proposed Williams pipeline project Atlantic Sunrise that will come through their area. Following the November election in which Pitts was re-elected, a Pitts staffer responded to several of them, calling them up to discuss the project and tell them why they ought to allow Williams to survey their property. NEVER talk common sense to an anti-driller. So the anti-drillers conscripted the local newspaper to turn the story around and make it seem like the Pitts staffer is engaged in illegal lobbying for Williams…
    Read More “Lancaster Congressional Staffer Calls Anti-Pipeliners – Big Mistake”

  • Best of the Rest

    Marcellus & Utica Shale Story Links: Tue, Dec 23, 2014

    December 23, 2014December 23, 2014

    The “best of the rest” – stories that caught MDN’s eye that you may be interested in reading:
    Read More “Marcellus & Utica Shale Story Links: Tue, Dec 23, 2014”

  • Anti-Drilling/Fossil Fuel | Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | New York | Regulation | Statewide NY

    Anti-Drillers Continue to Use NY Decision to Bully Other States

    December 22, 2014December 22, 2014

    no bullyingMore evidence to support what MDN has been telling you: That nutjob anti-fossil fuelers are using the New York decision to ban fracking in an attempt to bully other states (see Anti-Drillers Seek Domino Effect in More States After NY Frack Ban). Three odious groups are behind much of this bullying: Food & Water Watch, Earthjustice and the National Resources Defense Council. Notice which “network” they run to for rebroadcast of their pap–the anti-American, terrorist-loving Al Jazeera. Also notice that before the NY ban these same people said there isn’t all that much of an economic benefit for fracking in NY. No reason to frack in NY, no one would make any money on it. Now that the ban is in place? They say fracking in NY would have been “a financial boon for the state” which makes Cuomo’s decision “momentous.” It’s called talking out of both sides of a lying mouth…
    Read More “Anti-Drillers Continue to Use NY Decision to Bully Other States”

  • Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | New York | Regulation | Statewide NY

    NY Farmers to Cuomo on Frack Ban–You Gave us the Shaft

    December 22, 2014December 22, 2014

    There is ongoing fallout from New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s political decision to disallow fracking during his tenure as governor (an act that disqualifies him from running for national office). Farmers in the Southern Tier of NY are weighing in on Cuomo’s political decision, and they’re none too happy:
    Read More “NY Farmers to Cuomo on Frack Ban–You Gave us the Shaft”

  • Anti-Drilling/Fossil Fuel | Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | New York | Regulation | Research | Statewide NY

    NY Health Dept Fracking Report Based on Anti-Drilling “Research”

    December 22, 2014December 22, 2014

    The Fix is InThe most compelling “let the science decide” reason for banning fracking in NY given by Gov. Andrew Cuomo? Because his hand-picked Commissioner of the Dept. of Health, Howard Zucker, said he wouldn’t let his own kids play outside near a fracking site. If you actually read the biased report filed by Zucker, you find the following: a) Zucker says there are no scientific conclusions, as of yet, that fracking harms “public health”–he clearly admits it, and b) he laundry lists a bunch of “studies” and reports that are not peer reviewed, not published, and funded by anti-drilling groups to disparage fracking. He overlooked and left out published, peer reviewed studies that say fracking doesn’t harm people. That is, Zucker stacked the deck, he loaded the dice–whatever metaphor you want to use. The outcome was predetermined (a political decision by Cuomo) and Zucker prostituted himself and has permanently damaged his own reputation by being the “fall guy” for Cuomo’s decision. We expect it’s a quid pro quo–Zucker finds against fracking in return for moving from “Acting” Commissioner to full Commissioner at the DOH–a job he’s clearly not qualified for. Keep an eye out for Zucker’s permanent appointment in the near future. When you see it, you’ll know the fix was in…
    Read More “NY Health Dept Fracking Report Based on Anti-Drilling “Research””

  • Hydraulic Fracturing | Industrywide Issues | New York | Regulation | Statewide NY

    Upstate NY Politicians Criticize Cuomo over Frack Ban

    December 22, 2014December 22, 2014

    New York state representatives and local town leaders from upstate NY are almost universally critical of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s political decision to ban fracking. According to elected leaders, Cuomo has just screwed upstate in a big way. They also point out the complete reversal in Cuomo’s position from just one year ago when he embraced using fracked natural gas in western NY…
    Read More “Upstate NY Politicians Criticize Cuomo over Frack Ban”

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 1,453 1,454 1,455 1,456 1,457 … 1,953 Next PageNext
Search

Get Daily Headlines

Newsletter Optin

Recent MDN Issues

  • June 23, 2026
  • June 22, 2026
  • June 19, 2026
  • June 18, 2026
  • June 17, 2026

List of All Daily Issues

Most Recent Articles

  • Seneca Resources Changes e-Fracking Vendor to Evolution Well
  • Boardwalk Offers Temporary Capacity Along Pipeline to Southeast
  • Homer City Economic Boom Now Under Way from Data Center Project
  • Freeport LNG Returns to Full Output Following Another Outage
  • Coalition Asks Congress to Halt Foreign-Funded Energy Lawsuits
  • MDN’s Energy Stories of Interest: Tue, Jun 23, 2026
  • 2 New Shale Well Permits Reported for PA-OH-WV Jun 8 – 14
  • M-U Rigs Even @ 36; Haynesville Even @ 55; Nat’l Up 1 @ 563
  • PA County Receiving Most Impact Fee $$ Not the State’s Top Producer
  • Inside the Deal to Convert Potomac Coal Plant to Gas Data Center

© 2009-2026 Marcellus Drilling News

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • About
  • Article Index
  • Calendar
  • Advertising
  • User Guide
  • Subscribe
  • Log In