PA Congressman Rips EPA over “War on Coal” at Pittsburgh Hearing
Pennsylvania Congressman Tim Murphy delivered a sterling statement at a field hearing held by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in Pittsburgh last Friday. The EPA is doing a road show to take comments on their new, very restrictive regulations that are part of so-called climate change regulations (how stupid is it that we say the climate changes–of course it does!). Murphy’s comments address the Obama EPA’s war on coal. That what he calls it, that’s what everyone (but Obama and the EPA) calls it. We bring you his testimony before the EPA because (a) it takes aim at an out-of-control EPA, an issue near and dear to our hearts for lo these many years, and (b) because the EPA won’t stop with coal. They’re coming for natural gas next, after they’ve eliminated coal from the picture. You can bank on it…
Read More “PA Congressman Rips EPA over “War on Coal” at Pittsburgh Hearing”

Three weeks ago MDN highlighted news from NGI’s Shale Daily that Magnum Hunter Resources had purchased the mineral rights for two former Ormet properties in Ohio and West Virginia (see
Washington & Jefferson College, located in Washington, PA (Pittsburgh suburb) has a Center for Energy Policy & Management–which makes sense since Washington County, PA sits in the middle of the wet gas Marcellus drilling zone. W&J recently teamed up with the Washington, DC-based Environmental Law Institute (ELI) to study the “boom and bust” cycle that communities face with resource extraction like the Marcellus Shale. The thought was to produce a document–in this case a series of documents–that can guide local and state politicians as they plan for the future. How can, and even *can* a community avoid a “bust” after a huge boom? That’s what the documents aim to answer. The only problem is, the ELI seems to tilt anti-drilling, and the entire study was funded by Mamma Teresa Heinz-Kerry and her Heinz Endowments–a strongly anti-drilling organization. So you know where this is headed…
Sure looks to MDN like the so-called unbiased, independent pollsters at Siena College have pulled a fast one. They’ve either unintentionally, or perhaps intentionally, cherry-picked polling results in order to report in their latest poll that “51 percent of voters int the Southern Tier and Finger Lakes oppose hydrofracking, compared to 39 percent in support.” Here’s why the poll, and therefore it’s results, are fatally flawed and meaningless…