Chevron CEO Says Marcellus Drilling Scaled Back Due to Low Price
When the annual analyst teleconference for a big oil company is forecast to go 2.5-3 hours long, you know the news will not be good. It doesn’t take that long unless you have explain and re-explain yourself multiple times. Although MDN did not participate in yesterday’s annual analyst call for Chevron, by all accounts, the news was negative and the company’s stock ticked down by the end of the day by $1.33 per share (1.1%).
Chevron is a huge company–the second largest oil company in the United States based on market capitalization. The only thing MDN was interested in, aside from any mentions about the recent well fire in Greene County, PA (no mentions of the well fire in the call that we could find), is, What is Chevron up to in the Marcellus? The answer we got from looking at the slides and reading media reports of yesterday’s call is: not much. Chevron Chairman and CEO John Watson said “some” of the drilling in the PA Marcellus has been curtailed because of the low commodity price of natural gas. MDN’s Marcellus and Utica Shale Databook show Chevron’s permitting activity picked up a bit toward the end of 2013. It seems from Watson’s comments that they will continue to actively drill in the Marcellus in 2014, but likely not at the same levels seen in 2012 and 2013…
Read More “Chevron CEO Says Marcellus Drilling Scaled Back Due to Low Price”

In June 2012 MDN brought you the story that of possible collusion between Chesapeake Energy and Encana over lease offers in the state of Michigan. At the time we pointed out that the Reuters news service had “obtained” confidential emails that supposedly show such collusion, and we asked the question, how did Reuters come by those emails (see
A newly published peer reviewed study in the February Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) offers new research that we believe comes close to, if not fully, exonerating Cabot Oil & Gas over the now infamous case of methane migration into water wells in a small area of Dimock, PA. The new study has no connection to Cabot. It is written by three experts and uses (gasp) actual science–you know, in the field data? The data comes from “more than 2,300 gas and water samples collected from 234 gas wells and 67 private groundwater-supply wells” in northeastern PA and is the largest such data set ever analyzed. What did the authors find? Shallow (near the surface) methane with the same identical chemical “fingerprint” as deeper Marcellus Shale gas is naturally occurring in large quantities in northeastern PA. That is, the shallow methane under the microscope looks exactly like the methane found more than a mile below the ground, but it isn’t gas from the Marcellus because the methane near the surface that looks just like Marcellus gas, with the same chemical “fingerprint,” was lurking in water wells long before there was any shale drilling in the area.