Industrywide Issues

  • | | | | | |

    Clash of the Titans: PA Marcellus Gas Competes with TX Permian

    Last week MDN editor Jim Willis attended Hart Energy’s Marcellus-Utica Midstream conference in Pittsburgh (a series of stories are coming this week from that event). One of the stray comments Jim heard at the event was this: The chief rival or competitor to the Marcellus with respect to natural gas production is not, as you might assume (we sure did) the Haynesville Shale in Louisiana. No. The chief competitor, producing more and more volumes of natgas, is…the Permian! That’s right, an oil play! Why? When you drill for oil, you get other hydrocarbons out of the ground along with the oil. Primarily methane, or natural gas. It’s called “associated gas.” Even though most of what comes out of a Permian well is oil and not gas, because there are so darned many oil wells in the Permian (with more being drilled all the time), the total volume of gas coming from the Permian is going up, dramatically. The problem is, some Marcellus/Utica gas heads to the Gulf Coast to be used by petrochemical companies or to be exported. However, gas produced right there in the region is less expensive to get to market (shorter distance), so that Permian-sourced gas is competing, and increasingly crowding out, Marcellus/Utica gas. Investors have noticed and have, in a sense, “punished” some of the biggest of the big Marcellus/Utica producers by selling their shares, leading to a loss in share value. Among the hardest hit have been Southwestern Energy, Gulfport Energy, and Range Resources. The stock price for those three companies is down, since Jan. 1st, 33%, 30% and 25% respectively. A Bloomberg article says the stocks for those companies have been “mauled.” Indeed. Here’s some insight into how the Marcellus/Utica is increasingly going up against the oil giant Permian Basin, sometimes getting mauled…
    Read More “Clash of the Titans: PA Marcellus Gas Competes with TX Permian”

  • | | | | |

    NJ Continues to Hassle PennEast Pipe with Refusals & Rejections

    The State of New Jersey and its elected leaders (Governor and Attorney General) continue their quest to hassle and block the PennEast Pipeline from entering a small portion of their state. Why? To answer that question you’d have to enter their brains to understand all of the political calculations that go on–a very scary proposition. NJ Attorney General Gurbir Grewal (far-left Democrat) on Friday rejected PennEast’s request to use state-owned land for small part of the pipeline’s route. Also last week, the NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection (an executive branch agency, reports to NJ’s newly elected LibDem Gov. Phil Murphy) told PennEast the DEP is closing the books on PennEast’s water crossing permit application for lack of information. PennEast says the DEP’s action was not a surprise and that they will refile the application with the additional information sought. It all just points to a very hostile (to private business) government that has seized power in The Garden State. Don’t worry, PennEast isn’t letting NJ’s hostility stop them. This pipeline will still get built…
    Read More “NJ Continues to Hassle PennEast Pipe with Refusals & Rejections”

  • | | |

    Trump Tax Cut has Unintended Consequences for Pipeline Projects

    President Trump’s marvelous tax cut has had some unintended (negative) consequences for pipeline companies. Trade groups and some states are pressuring the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to force pipeline companies to cut the rates they charge customers in light of the Trump tax cut. The corporate tax rate is going from 35% (highest of any modern/Western country) down to 21%. Which will encourage all sorts of investment in the good old US of A. When pipelines file rate cases for how much they will charge customers to flow gas (or oil or whatever else) through the pipeline, part of the calculation for what FERC allows them to charge is based on profitability. Since those companies will now be a whole lot more profitable (tax payments going down), the customers using those pipelines want the rates recalculated to reflect the savings. In other words, they want part of the tax savings too. But wait just a rootin’-tootin’ minute! (says the pipeline companies). The pipelines have duly signed contracts in place. You can’t just rework a single portion of those contracts with the sweep of a pen. What about other components in the contract that are used in calculating prices? In some (many?) cases pipeline companies have borne increased costs that are not passed along to customers. If the customers (mainly utility companies) want FERC to adjust the rates, they may not like how those rates get adjusted considering all the other factors that could/should be changed. Maybe they’ll go up instead of down! A battle is brewing between utilities and the pipelines that feed them, all because of Trump’s tax cut…
    Read More “Trump Tax Cut has Unintended Consequences for Pipeline Projects”

  • | | |

    PA Shale Wells Drilled Soars 56% in 2017; Impact Fee Up $5,400/Well

    In early 2012, Pennsylvania enacted the most sweeping rework of oil and gas laws in the state in decades (see Gov. Corbett Signs New Marcellus Drilling Law). Called Act 13, one of the provisions of the law is an “impact fee” collected on each horizontal shale well drilled. The fee is intended to offset the impacts of drilling in places where drilling happens, hence the name. However, in order to get enough support to pass Act 13, politics were played and 40% of the “fee” got re-allocated to non-impact uses–i.e., 40% of the fee became a tax (see PA’s New Tax on Drilling (er Sorry, Impact Fee)). In reality, PA’s impact “fee” is the equivalent of a severance tax. The main difference is that the fee is calculated according to a sliding schedule based on how long a well has been around. Beginning with the first year a shale well is drilled, and every year thereafter, drillers pay a set fee, regardless of how much gas is produced. If a driller drills a well but doesn’t complete it in year one, that driller still pays the same (very steep) fee, regardless of no production. In that way, an impact fee is superior to a severance tax as a revenue generator for the state. Impact fees are paid for 15 years. In setting up the somewhat complicated schedule for how much a driller will pay, it depends on how old the well is. The PA Public Utility Commission (PUC), the agency in charge of assessing and collecting the fee, periodically adjusts the fee schedule up to account for inflation. The fee assessed depends on how much the price of natural gas is selling for at the benchmark Henry Hub trading point (in Louisiana). In 2017 (which collected fees from drilling in 2016), if the price of natgas at Henry Hub averaged between $2.26 – $2.99 for the year (which it did, at $2.46/Mcf), the impact fee for a newly drilled well during the year of 2016 was $45,300. In 2018 (collecting fees from 2017), the price of natgas at Henry Hub was in the next higher bracket, averaging between $3.00 – $4.99 (2017 averaged $3.11/Mcf). So the fee for first year wells drilled last year will be $50,700–which is $5,400 higher than a driller would have paid the previous year. Our point: Drillers in PA pay big bucks in “fees” (i.e. taxes) to drill in the state. Slapping a severance tax on top of the impact fee would be a disaster, virtually shutting down any new Marcellus drilling. Yet that’s what Gov. Wolf and his Democrat comrades insist on doing. Below is the newly released impact fee schedule for 2018 (covering wells drilled in 2017), along with details on the whopping increase in the number of wells drilled in 2017 vs. 2016…
    Read More “PA Shale Wells Drilled Soars 56% in 2017; Impact Fee Up $5,400/Well”

  • | | | | | |

    Gov. Cuomo Triples Upstate NY Electric Bills by Blocking Natgas

    This is a somewhat personal story that perfectly illustrates the point we’ve been making for years. MDN editor Jim Willis lives with his wife and family in the Binghamton, NY area. Jim likes to say he “lives behind enemy lines”–meaning New York State under Andrew Cuomo and his radical left base are hostile to the fossil fuel industry. The cost of Cuomo’s actions for every New Yorker (at least those of us living in Upstate) is now on full display for all to see. A few weeks ago Jim got his monthly electric bill from New York State Electric & Gas (NYSEG, owned by the Spanish company Iberdrola). Jim’s eyes about fell out of their sockets. Jim largely uses electricity for heating (with a fuel oil furnace as backup). No natural gas lines where Jim lives, unfortunately. Even in the dead of winter Jim’s electric bill is rarely over $200 in any given month–typically around $150. This time? Nearly $700!!!! At first, Jim chalked it up to the cold snap and the constant running of his electric heat source. Then he spotted an article (below, sent to us by Vic Furman), that shows Jim is not the only one. Across the entire region folks received bills that are double and triple the usual amount. Why the spike in price? It seems the lack of natural gas via pipelines is not only hurting New England, it’s now hurting Upstate NY. Due to a lack of natgas supplies and the huge regional demand for natgas–for home heating as well as for electric generators–the spot price for gas went through the roof and along with it NYSEG’s cost for both natgas and electricity generated by natgas also went through the roof. Consequently, Cuomo’s frack ban and (now) pipeline ban on importing natgas from PA are having very real, tangible consequences–in our electric bills. All of Cuomo’s precious renewable sources of energy will not, indeed cannot, make up for a lack of natgas. Cuomo’s stupidity is costing ME real money…
    Read More “Gov. Cuomo Triples Upstate NY Electric Bills by Blocking Natgas”

  • | | | | | |

    PennEast Pipe Forced to Do It Hard Way – Using Eminent Domain

    As we told you last week, today (Monday, Feb. 5) is the final day for landowners who live along the path of the PennEast Pipeline to accept an offer from PennEast to lease their land for the pipeline (see PennEast Pipe Gives Holdout Landowners Feb 5 Deadline to Sign). The landowners have had near three years to deal in good faith negotiations with PennEast, and now time has run out. On Friday, a group of holdout landowners symbolically tore up their PennEast lease offers in a vain media stunt. Starting later this week they will receive something via certified mail they better not tear up–a court summons for an eminent domain proceeding. It’s a shame when it has to come to that, but denial is a strong emotion. Now it’s off to court they go where they’ll get a splash of reality…
    Read More “PennEast Pipe Forced to Do It Hard Way – Using Eminent Domain”

  • | | | | | |

    Federal Judge Pushes Pause Button on Mountain Valley Pipe in VA

    In mid-January MDN brought you the news that (sadly) Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) had to file in federal court to “condemn” some holdout landowner properties along the pipeline’s route (see Mountain Valley Pipe Tweaks Route, Asks VA Judge for Eminent Domain). MVP is a $3.5 billion, 303-mile pipeline that will run from Wetzel County, WV to the Transco Pipeline in Pittsylvania County, VA. Holdout landowners in Virginia hired attorneys who argued that because MVP continued to tweak the route of the pipeline (in an attempt to work WITH said landowners!), that serves as evidence MVP doesn’t know what it really wants and whom to condemn with eminent domain–therefore the whole thing should be put on hold. MVP wants condemnation using eminent domain for Virginia landowners to happen now, because they are playing Beat the Clock with tree clearing along the path of the pipeline, work that must be done by March 31st because federal law prohibits it after March 31st for fear of killing a few roosting bats (we kid you not). In a decision handed down last week, a federal judge gave both sides reason for hope. The judge ruled that MVP can proceed with eminent domain cases against some 300 landowners–a huge legal victory for MVP. However, MVP can’t (yet) enter those properties for tree clearing and survey work. Why? Because MVP hasn’t provided the judge with enough proof that they will be able to pay landowners a fair price for their property when the time comes to settle up. She’s not saying MVP can’t or won’t pay up, she’s saying she wants to see more evidence first (surety bonds), before she will let MVP begin work. Those opposed to the pipeline heralded the judge’s decision to temporarily prevent work as some sort of victory–which it is not. They lost the case! The properties are now condemned using eminent domain (or soon will be, once the court paperwork proceeds). The judge’s order temporarily prevents work, but we expect MVP will remedy that post haste so they can then start up the chainsaws and get to work…
    Read More “Federal Judge Pushes Pause Button on Mountain Valley Pipe in VA”

  • | | | | | | | |

    Atlantic Sunrise Pipe’s Positive Impact in Lancaster Already Felt

    Money–a lot of money–is flowing into Lancaster County because of construction work now being done on Williams’ $3 billion, 198-mile Atlantic Sunrise natural gas pipeline project running through 10 Pennsylvania counties to connect Marcellus Shale natural gas from northeastern PA with the Williams’ Transco pipeline in southern Lancaster County. Local media pitches the revenue and jobs created by the project as “temporary.” MDN once heard a union pipeline worker respond to that very argument at a FERC hearing (for the Constitution Pipeline) by saying he’s had an entire career of “temporary” pipeline jobs that last a few months or a year–making enough money to put his kids through college and make a nice living for himself and his family. Lancaster residents should jump for joy at their “temporary” blessing of this pipeline’s construction. Among the beneficiaries of these “temporary benefits” are “dozens of local businesses” and “more than 100 workers” who are employed full-time working on the project. An estimated $75 million (!) is now flooding into the Lancaster County economy, thanks to Atlantic Sunrise…
    Read More “Atlantic Sunrise Pipe’s Positive Impact in Lancaster Already Felt”

  • | |

    Spire Expects Early 2018 FERC Approval for M-U Gas to St. Louis Pipe

    How long does it take to plan and build a pipeline? Too long. Two years ago (February 2016) MDN told you about an exciting new market for Marcellus and Utica Shale gas that may open up one day in the Midwest (see New Midwest Pipeline to Tap REX’s Marcellus/Utica Gas). Laclede Group, a St. Louis-based natural gas utility, said they want to build a ~60-mile pipeline from St. Louis through southwest Illinois and connect to the Rockies Express (REX) and Panhandle Eastern Pipeline. The new pipeline would bring low-cost Marcellus and Utica Shale gas from REX to the utility–not only for resale to gas customers, but also potentially for new natgas-powered electric plants planned to replace retiring coal-fired plants. A year later (February 2017) Laclede was renamed Spire and the Spire STL Pipeline filed an official application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to build their 59-mile, 24-inch diameter pipe that would flow 400 million cubic feet (MMcf) per day of yummy Marcellus/Utica gas from REX to St. Louis (see Spire Files Plan with FERC to Flow Marcellus/Utica Gas to St. Louis). Another year has slipped by–we’re now starting the third year of this project. We have an update from Spire…
    Read More “Spire Expects Early 2018 FERC Approval for M-U Gas to St. Louis Pipe”

  • | | |

    Can Virtual Pipelines Rescue New England from Russian LNG?

    The whole story of Russian LNG coming to Boston to help New England with its crisis shortage of natural gas continues to irk us. Although Russia and the Yamal plant where the gas was liquefied were sanctioned under President Obama. However, the actual gas itself was/is not sanctioned, for whatever reason. We have a situation where New England continues to obstinately refuse new natgas pipelines, instead buying LNG from Russia during critical shortages. We’re paying (and depending on) our enemies for natural gas when world-class supplies of it exist a few hundred miles away in the Marcellus. We’ve written about this confounding situation since early January (see our Russian LNG stories here). Last Friday the co-founder of NG Advantage–a “virtual pipeline” company that compresses natural gas from interstate pipelines and transports it, via trucks, to businesses and organizations that want gas but can’t get it via pipelines–wrote an intriguing blog post. Tom Evslin’s post makes a case for using virtual pipelines (i.e. CNG transported by trucks) as an alternative to help alleviate the extreme winter shortages in New England. Could trucked CNG (and LNG) actually eliminate the need for a pipeline to New England? We would argue “no.” However, without a doubt a virtual pipeline could help in certain places and under certain circumstances. Here’s Tom’s argument in favor of using virtual pipelines to alleviate New England’s stubbornly high prices for natural gas, and possibly save us from importing Russian LNG…
    Read More “Can Virtual Pipelines Rescue New England from Russian LNG?”

  • | | | | | |

    Utica Pipeline Explosion in Noble County, OH Affects Natl Output

    Seneca Lateral pipeline fire – Noble County, OH

    On Wednesday around 2:30 am in the morning, a section of 24-inch pipeline that runs from the MarkWest Energy natural gas processing plant in Noble County, OH and the Rockies Express (REX) pipeline (also in Noble County) exploded and caught fire. The Noble County Emergency Management Office says it happened about three miles north of Summerfield, Ohio, near Ohio State Routes 513 and 379. Fortunately, no one was injured. Neighbors heard the explosion and saw a glowing night sky. The only damage was to some nearby trees. That short segment of pipeline is known as the Seneca Lateral, owned by Tallgrass (owner of REX Pipeline). Tallgrass is investigating the cause of the accident. Believe it or not, that one pipeline and the gas it flows from the MarkWest plant to REX, carrying it to the Midwest, has caused the entire national output of natural gas to decrease by an estimated 2%, according to Reuters. A single small pipeline can actually move the needle on output! Right away the Sierra Club jumped into the story with a wild claim that the pipeline was not properly reviewed before regulators signed off on it. Typical headline-grabbing propaganda from the Clubbers. Here are the details we could find about the explosion/fire…
    Read More “Utica Pipeline Explosion in Noble County, OH Affects Natl Output”

  • | | | | | |

    Ambridge Water Authority Strongly Opposes Shell Ethane Pipe Route

    Shell has had pretty smooth sailing with their proposed 97-mile Falcon ethane pipeline project–a pipeline that will feed the mighty $6 billion cracker plant Shell is building in Beaver County, PA. Shell did not use eminent domain but instead negotiated with (paid big bucks for) rights of way along the pipeline’s path. That process continues. There have been some grumblings here and there, particularly from Big Green groups. But all in all, there has been remarkably little opposition–that is, until now. Shell filed an application to build the Falcon project back in October (see Shell Files PA Application for Ethane Pipe to Feed Cracker Plant). On Jan. 20, Shell filed an application for federal stream crossing permits–something the PA State Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) issues (see PA DEP Invites Public Comment on Shell 60-Mile Ethane Pipeline). Because of the stream crossing application, the Ambridge Water Authority (in Beaver County), an organization that oversees a reservoir that provides drinking water for ~30,000 people, is expressing “strong opposition” to the route of the Falcon pipeline. Wait a minute. Didn’t Ambridge know the route back in October, when Shell first filed? Yes. However, the stream crossing permit application reveals details either not in, or not obvious, in the original application–details that the pipeline will go under three streams that feed the Ambridge reservoir. That’s got the board up in arms. In a statement, the Water Authority said, “we will do everything in our power to try and have the pipeline relocated outside of our watershed and away from our main, and only, raw water line.” Whether or not there’s any legitimacy to their concerns, Shell now has a PR situation on its hands–the old “it’s going to poison our drinking water” canard that’s a favorite of those who oppose drilling and pipelines. It will be interesting to see how Shell handle’s this situation…
    Read More “Ambridge Water Authority Strongly Opposes Shell Ethane Pipe Route”

  • | | | |

    PennEast Pipe Gives Holdout Landowners Feb 5 Deadline to Sign

    It took over three years, but finally PennEast Pipeline received a full, final approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) two weeks ago (see FERC Grants Final Approval for PennEast Pipe – Real Battle Begins). PennEast is a $1 billion, 120-mile primarily 36-inch natural gas pipeline that will stretch from Dallas (Luzerne County), PA to Transco’s pipeline interconnection near Pennington (Mercer County), NJ. The pipeline is an important conduit to move gas from the prolific gas fields of northeastern PA to markets in southeast PA and New Jersey. There has been plenty of opposition, mostly whipped up by Big Green groups like THE Delaware Riverkeeper and the nutty Sierra Clubbers of NJ. PennEast has been (for years) negotiating with landowners along the pipeline’s proposed route, to purchase easements. Some 75% of landowners have either signed leases and/or allowed survey access of their property. Some landowners apparently bought in to the Big Green lie that this project won’t happen, so they have refused to negotiate or allow survey access. Time has now run out. With the FERC certificate in hand, PennEast can now go to court and request eminent domain proceedings against the holdouts. PennEast has sent letters to the holdouts telling them they have until Feb. 5 to accept the generous offer PennEast has made. After that, the landowners can expect to receive court paperwork telling them to allow access. What generally happens is that (a) a court order appears granting PennEast access to the property now, and (b) months or even over a year later, a judge will decide what a fair value is (typically less than being offered by PennEast) for the lease. The holdouts should have known this day was coming, but denial is a powerful emotion…
    Read More “PennEast Pipe Gives Holdout Landowners Feb 5 Deadline to Sign”

  • | | | |

    MPLX 2017 Results: Income Up Astounding 241%, Adding 6 Plants

    MPLX, which used to be known as MarkWest Energy prior to selling itself to Marathon Petroleum, issued its fourth quarter 2017 update yesterday. And wow, what an update! MarkWest…OK, MPLX (old habits die hard)…is the Marcellus/Utica region’s leading gas processing company. MPLX’s facilities process on the order of 60% of all the gas produced in the Marcellus/Utica. The region produced record volumes of gas in 4Q17 (and indeed for all of 2017), which in turn led to record volumes of gas processed (separating the methane from the other hydrocarbons), and record volumes of fractionation (separating the other hydrocarbons into their respective components) for MPLX. Net income soared, both for the fourth quarter and full year. In 4Q17, MPLX’s net income was $238 million, up from $133 million in 4Q16–a 79% increase. For the entire year, MPLX’s net income was $794 million, vs. $233 million in 2016. That a 241% increase year over year! Yeah, the Marcellus/Utica came back big time in 2017. But MPLX isn’t sitting around basking in the glow of success–they have big plans for 2018. In the Marcellus/Utica, MPLX will add six new gas processing plants, increasing the company’s processing capacity by 21% to over 7 billion cubic feet per day. Additionally, MPLX expects to add 40,000 barrels per day of ethane fractionation capacity, and 60,000 barrels per day of propane-plus fractionation. Below is the full update along with the latest PowerPoint presentation…
    Read More “MPLX 2017 Results: Income Up Astounding 241%, Adding 6 Plants”

  • | | |

    Locals Opposed to Jessup Power Plant Question Emissions “Credits”

    Invenergy is currently building the Lackawanna Energy Center, a 1,480 megawatt plant in Jessup, PA (near Scranton) that will cost “well over $1 billion” according to an exclusive MDN source working on the project. When the plant is done (first phase ready sometime this month), and when it goes online (to be determined), it will be Pennsylvania’s largest natural gas-fired electric generating plant. Unfortunately, a group of Democrats got themselves elected to the Jessup Borough Council specifically to try and block the completion of the project (see Jessup Town Board Continues Effort to Stop Gas-Fired Elec Plant). They just took office in January and already have thrown up roadblocks. Wednesday the PA Dept. of Environmental Protection held a hearing about the facility’s potential impacts on local (and regional) air quality. Some three dozen folks showed up to trash talk the project. They’re questioning the plant’s Emission Reduction Credits (ERC). This plant will put some bad stuff in the air (small quantities), as all electric generating plants do. In order to “offset” the negatives of putting those small quantities of bad stuff in the air, the plant must purchase ERCs. That is, someone somewhere else will sell their “right” to emit the same bad stuff (i.e. pollute) in return for cash. That’s a grossly oversimplified and perhaps not totally accurate way to say it–but it serves the purpose of understanding the complex issue of ERCs. At the DEP hearing, those who oppose the plant were questioning the ERCs for this facility. Their argument is, maybe the air quality in the entire region will benefit from having a clean-burning natgas-fired plant, but will that benefit for the region (and country) be at the expense of making the air worse for the neighbors who live near the plant? As much as we disagree with those who oppose this project, their question is valid and important…
    Read More “Locals Opposed to Jessup Power Plant Question Emissions “Credits””

  • | | | | |

    UGI Energy Tweaks LNG Peak Shaver for Bethlehem, PA

    UGI LNG’s Temple I peak shaver near Reading, Pa. with 3-million-gallon storage tank

    It’s time to learn something new (there’s always something new to learn in this industry). Ever hear of a peak shaver? No, nothing to do with that thing guys use in the morning to shave off the stubble. An LNG peak shaver is a unit used for storing surplus natural gas, to have extra natgas on hand and ready during times of peak consumption during really hot summers or really cold winters. Sometimes your local gas utility will build and use a peak shaver (small LNG storage facility), so they don’t run out of natgas at a critical time, and to help with keeping prices lower by drawing down from storage if prices spike. Low prices make for happy customers. UGI, a diversified energy company with both midstream (pipeline) operations and one of PA’s largest utility companies, uses peak shavers. We’ve written about their use of peak shavers in the past (see UGI Building LNG Plant in NEPA, Local Marcellus Gas to Feed It). We’re interested in such facilities because of their potential as a new demand source for our plentiful gas supplies. UGI is proposing a new peak shaver for Bethlehem, PA. The project hit some early opposition, so UGI has tweaked the design, meaning they can proceed…
    Read More “UGI Energy Tweaks LNG Peak Shaver for Bethlehem, PA”