AI | Anti-Drilling/Fossil Fuel | Industrywide Issues | Lackawanna County | Pennsylvania | Regulation | Statewide PA
Some PA Republican Lawmakers Getting Sucked into Anti-Data Center
Although there are legitimate concerns over data centers locating in populated communities (noise, water use, etc.), make no mistake: The anti-data center movement is nothing more than the anti-fracking movement in new clothes (see More Evidence that PA’s Anti-Frackers are Now Anti-Data Center). Unfortunately, some Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania are getting sucked (and suckered) into supporting the anti-data center movement. They’re making a tragic mistake. Read More “Some PA Republican Lawmakers Getting Sucked into Anti-Data Center”
The Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI) is a CEO-led initiative comprising 12 of the world’s leading energy companies that have sold out and pledged allegiance to the cockamamie “net zero” future and the 2015 Paris Agreement. OGCI’s members are Aramco, BP, Chevron, CNPC, Eni, Equinor, ExxonMobil, Occidental, Petrobras, Repsol, Shell, and TotalEnergies. Shame on them all. The OGCI is now colluding with the so-called Carbon Mapper in “a new collaboration aimed at accelerating practical and measurable reductions in methane emissions from the oil and gas industry.” They’re all zealous about solving the fugitive methane problem, but only 21% of it comes from the O&G sector. 
Two radical environmental groups, the Southern Environmental Law Center and Sierra Club, have sued Georgia regulators over the approval of four clean-burning natural gas turbines at Georgia Power’s Plant Bowen. The radicals claim that the expansion at Bowen (in Taylorsville, Bartow County, Georgia) will release hundreds of tons of smog-forming volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) annually, thereby worsening air quality in the Atlanta region (Taylorsville is about 40 miles from Atlanta as the crow flies). The lawsuit claims the Georgia Environmental Protection Division bypassed stricter permitting requirements intended for areas with high ozone levels. Typical lawfare tactic. 
Last week, RBN Energy held its GasCon 2026 conference in Houston, Texas. Among the heavy hitters who attended and spoke at the event were Sital Mody, President of Natural Gas Pipelines at Kinder Morgan, and Dan Brouillette, the 15th Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. Mody had this to say during his talk: “When I take a step back and reflect on the natural gas industry, the one thing that comes to mind for me is all gas, no brakes.” 
Although the Iran war has caused shipping, including oil shipping, to temporarily stop through the Strait of Hormuz, the bigger story is how the war currently is, and will continue to, affect the price of natural gas around the globe. Yesterday, QatarEnergy announced it is suspending production at the world’s largest LNG export facility following attacks by Iran. Qatar accounts for 20% of global LNG capacity, so its decision removes 20% of the market’s LNG supply for now. It represents the most significant market shock since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Dutch TTF Natural Gas Futures (the European benchmark, like our own Henry Hub) for April 2026 have surged 85% since Friday, trading near €59.62 following a 33.97% jump earlier today. 
U.S. LNG exporters are scrambling to capitalize on a 50+ percent price surge in European and Asian markets following an Iranian drone attack that halted production at Qatar’s massive Ras Laffan plant. Leading U.S. exporters like Venture Global and Cheniere Energy are maximizing output (squeezing every extra molecule out they can from existing plants) and rerouting cargoes to meet global shortages. While the U.S.’s flexible export contracts provide critical market stability, experts warn that American capacity cannot fully replace Qatar’s lost volumes, which account for 20% of global supply. Unless production resumes shortly, the world faces a more severe energy crisis than the 2022 Russian gas shock. 
Quantum Pleasants has successfully completed a year-long validation of its Omnis Quantum Reformer (OQR) technology at the Pleasants Power Station in West Virginia. This breakthrough ultra-high-temperature pyrolysis technology produces hydrogen on-site at half the cost of existing methods by utilizing the state’s coal and natural gas resources. Independent evaluations confirmed the system’s safety and economic viability, paving the way for the 1,300 MW facility to become the world’s first large power plant to operate on 100% hydrogen fuel. Right here in the heart of the Marcellus/Utica! 
Marking the tenth anniversary of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, European Union (EU) and American officials convened in Pittsburgh on Friday for an all-day conference, “EU-U.S. LNG Cooperation 2.0,” which was held at the Heinz History Center. The purpose of the meeting was to reinforce a critical strategic energy partnership. Since the first shipment in 2016, and accelerated by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, U.S. LNG has transformed European energy security by enabling a dramatic shift away from dependence on Russian gas. As Europe seeks to eliminate Russian gas entirely, the U.S. has become the world’s leading exporter. 
The proposed $58 billion merger between Devon Energy and Coterra Energy is under scrutiny by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over “shale market dominance.” The key problem is: how does the DOJ define a “market” that may be dominated? What, exactly, is a market? Critics argue that the DOJ’s narrow market definitions—mirrored in its antitrust case against Visa—ignore broader competitive realities and existing regulations, such as the Durbin Amendment. While the Devon/Coterra merger increases shale concentration, natural gas remains a singular, competitive (much broader) market regardless of extraction methods. By applying outdated antitrust frameworks, the government risks stifling innovation and weakening companies’ ability to compete globally. Ultimately, rational policy must reflect modern market dynamics to avoid economic stagnation and the fragmentation of viable industries. So says author (and lawyer) Daniel Markind. 
PJM Interconnection recently proposed reforms to its retail BTM (behind-the-meter) generation rules to support data center colocation. The filing, responding to a FERC mandate, introduces a 50-MW threshold for BTM facilities and three new transmission service categories. Under the plan, new loads exceeding 50 MW would be ineligible for “netting,” a process that currently lowers grid charges by balancing on-site generation against consumption. While existing contracts are grandfathered, industrial trade groups warn that removing netting rules threatens the economic viability of combined heat and power facilities, potentially discouraging manufacturing investments while aiming to address regional grid reliability and grid cost-shifting concerns. 
In December, we brought you the sad and unexpected news that Energy Transfer (ET) had suspended development of its Lake Charles LNG project to “focus on allocating capital to its significant backlog of natural gas pipeline infrastructure projects that Energy Transfer believes provide superior risk/return profiles” (see